United States Supreme Court Reports, 45. sējumsLawyers Co-operative Publishing Company, 1976 |
No grāmatas satura
1.–3. rezultāts no 82.
306. lappuse
... considered that candidates are being evaluated for jobs at that higher level . However , where job progression is not so nearly automatic , or the time span is such that higher level jobs or employees ' potential may be ex- pected to ...
... considered that candidates are being evaluated for jobs at that higher level . However , where job progression is not so nearly automatic , or the time span is such that higher level jobs or employees ' potential may be ex- pected to ...
335. lappuse
... considered a petty offense within the meaning of 18 USC § 1 ( 3 ) [ 18 USCS 1 ( 3 ) ] , and that its demand for a jury trial was therefore erro- neously denied . [ 2b , 11 ] We cannot agree . In deter- mining the boundary between petty ...
... considered a petty offense within the meaning of 18 USC § 1 ( 3 ) [ 18 USCS 1 ( 3 ) ] , and that its demand for a jury trial was therefore erro- neously denied . [ 2b , 11 ] We cannot agree . In deter- mining the boundary between petty ...
502. lappuse
... considered necessary to curb abuses that had arisen in the sales of securities to insiders.24 The prohibition against insider trading would seem adequately served by the first clause of § 22 ( d ) , which prevents mutual funds from ...
... considered necessary to curb abuses that had arisen in the sales of securities to insiders.24 The prohibition against insider trading would seem adequately served by the first clause of § 22 ( d ) , which prevents mutual funds from ...
Citi izdevumi - Skatīt visu
Bieži izmantoti vārdi un frāzes
15 USCS 28 USCS 42 USCS 45 L Ed 95 S Ct action aliens alleged annexation antitrust laws appellees applied argued the cause backpay banks checkpoint Circuit denied claim Clayton Act commerce Commission concurring Congress consideration or decision constitutional Cook Inlet corporation counsel Court of Appeals criminal defendant disclosure dissenting District Court evidence Exchange exclusionary rule exempt F Supp federal court filed Fourth Amendment Government held holding illegal infra issue judgment judicial June 16 June 23 jurisdiction jury trial Justice Douglas took L Ed 2d legislation ment Miranda warnings opinion ordinance overbreadth person Petition for writ petitioner plaintiffs proceedings prosecution provides purpose question rates reasonable regulations remanded respondent Securities Sherman Act sion Sixth Amendment Stat statement statute statutory supra Supreme Court tion tional titioner tive United States 422 United States Court violation writ of certiorari