United States Supreme Court Reports, 45. sējumsLawyers Co-operative Publishing Company, 1976 |
No grāmatas satura
1.3. rezultāts no 80.
772. lappuse
... USCS §§ 6103 ( a ) ( 1 ) nor 7213 ( a ) ( 1 ) , since such statutes are designed to prevent disclosure of information contained ei- ther in returns or documents filed in conjunction therewith to enable the Ser- vice to determine tax ...
... USCS §§ 6103 ( a ) ( 1 ) nor 7213 ( a ) ( 1 ) , since such statutes are designed to prevent disclosure of information contained ei- ther in returns or documents filed in conjunction therewith to enable the Ser- vice to determine tax ...
773. lappuse
... USCS § 1905 ) which prohibits disclosure unless otherwise au- thorized . As to 38 USCS § 216 ( a ) ( 2 ) , the court concluded that the statute , which provides that the Administrator of Vet- erans ' Affairs may make available to any ...
... USCS § 1905 ) which prohibits disclosure unless otherwise au- thorized . As to 38 USCS § 216 ( a ) ( 2 ) , the court concluded that the statute , which provides that the Administrator of Vet- erans ' Affairs may make available to any ...
774. lappuse
... USCS § 552 ( b ) ( 3 ) on the basis of 18 USCS § 1905 , which makes it a criminal offense for any federal agent to disclose , in any manner not authorized by law , any in- formation coming to him in the course of his duties , which ...
... USCS § 552 ( b ) ( 3 ) on the basis of 18 USCS § 1905 , which makes it a criminal offense for any federal agent to disclose , in any manner not authorized by law , any in- formation coming to him in the course of his duties , which ...
Citi izdevumi - Skatīt visu
Bieži izmantoti vārdi un frāzes
15 USCS 28 USCS 42 USCS 45 L Ed 95 S Ct action aliens alleged annexation antitrust laws appellees applied argued the cause backpay banks checkpoint Circuit denied claim Clayton Act commerce Commission concurring Congress consideration or decision constitutional Cook Inlet corporation counsel Court of Appeals criminal defendant disclosure dissenting District Court evidence Exchange exclusionary rule exempt F Supp federal court filed Fourth Amendment Government held holding illegal infra issue judgment judicial June 16 June 23 jurisdiction jury trial Justice Douglas took L Ed 2d legislation ment Miranda warnings opinion ordinance overbreadth person Petition for writ petitioner plaintiffs proceedings prosecution provides purpose question rates reasonable regulations remanded respondent Securities Sherman Act sion Sixth Amendment Stat statement statute statutory supra Supreme Court tion tional titioner tive United States 422 United States Court violation writ of certiorari