United States Supreme Court Reports, 45. sējumsLawyers Co-operative Publishing Company, 1976 |
No grāmatas satura
1.–3. rezultāts no 85.
57. lappuse
... title of a proposed acquisition , merger , or consolidation transac- tion , and such transaction may not be con- summated before the thirtieth calendar day after the date of approval by the Board . Any action brought under the antitrust ...
... title of a proposed acquisition , merger , or consolidation transac- tion , and such transaction may not be con- summated before the thirtieth calendar day after the date of approval by the Board . Any action brought under the antitrust ...
299. lappuse
... Title VII had not been in " bad faith . " This is not a sufficient reason for denying backpay . Where an em- ployer has shown bad faith - by maintaining a practice which he knew to be illegal or of highly ques- tionable legality - he ...
... Title VII had not been in " bad faith . " This is not a sufficient reason for denying backpay . Where an em- ployer has shown bad faith - by maintaining a practice which he knew to be illegal or of highly ques- tionable legality - he ...
534. lappuse
... Title 28 , § 41 con- tained all of that title's grants of jurisdiction to United States district courts , save for sev- eral special - purpose jurisdictional grants of no relevance to the constitutionality of Social Security statutes . 4.
... Title 28 , § 41 con- tained all of that title's grants of jurisdiction to United States district courts , save for sev- eral special - purpose jurisdictional grants of no relevance to the constitutionality of Social Security statutes . 4.
Citi izdevumi - Skatīt visu
Bieži izmantoti vārdi un frāzes
15 USCS 28 USCS 42 USCS 45 L Ed 95 S Ct action aliens alleged annexation antitrust laws appellees applied argued the cause backpay banks checkpoint Circuit denied claim Clayton Act commerce Commission concurring Congress consideration or decision constitutional Cook Inlet corporation counsel Court of Appeals criminal defendant disclosure dissenting District Court evidence Exchange exclusionary rule exempt F Supp federal court filed Fourth Amendment Government held holding illegal infra issue judgment judicial June 16 June 23 jurisdiction jury trial Justice Douglas took L Ed 2d legislation ment Miranda warnings opinion ordinance overbreadth person Petition for writ petitioner plaintiffs proceedings prosecution provides purpose question rates reasonable regulations remanded respondent Securities Sherman Act sion Sixth Amendment Stat statement statute statutory supra Supreme Court tion tional titioner tive United States 422 United States Court violation writ of certiorari