United States Supreme Court Reports, 45. sējumsLawyers Co-operative Publishing Company, 1976 |
No grāmatas satura
1.–3. rezultāts no 86.
284. lappuse
... ( 42 USCS §§ 2000e et seq . ) can be vindicated by awarding , in all but very unusual circumstances , attorneys ' fees under 42 USCS § 2000e- 5 ( k ) , which authorizes the award of at- torneys ' fees in civil actions brought un- der 42 USCS ...
... ( 42 USCS §§ 2000e et seq . ) can be vindicated by awarding , in all but very unusual circumstances , attorneys ' fees under 42 USCS § 2000e- 5 ( k ) , which authorizes the award of at- torneys ' fees in civil actions brought un- der 42 USCS ...
532. lappuse
... USC § 1331 [ 28 USCS § 1331 ] , and that while it had jurisdiction of the claims of the named appellees under the provisions of 42 USC § 405 ( g ) [ 42 USCS § 405 ( g ) ] , it had no jurisdiction over the claims asserted on behalf of ...
... USC § 1331 [ 28 USCS § 1331 ] , and that while it had jurisdiction of the claims of the named appellees under the provisions of 42 USC § 405 ( g ) [ 42 USCS § 405 ( g ) ] , it had no jurisdiction over the claims asserted on behalf of ...
548. lappuse
... 42 USC § 416 ( e ) ( 1 ) ( 1970 ed Supp II ) [ 42 USCS § 416 ( e ) ( 1 ) ] . 13. According to the Social Security Admin- istration , in calendar 1973 there were 125,000 applicants for mother's benefits , 1,313,000 for child's benefits ...
... 42 USC § 416 ( e ) ( 1 ) ( 1970 ed Supp II ) [ 42 USCS § 416 ( e ) ( 1 ) ] . 13. According to the Social Security Admin- istration , in calendar 1973 there were 125,000 applicants for mother's benefits , 1,313,000 for child's benefits ...
Citi izdevumi - Skatīt visu
Bieži izmantoti vārdi un frāzes
15 USCS 28 USCS 42 USCS 45 L Ed 95 S Ct action aliens alleged annexation antitrust laws appellees applied argued the cause backpay banks checkpoint Circuit denied claim Clayton Act commerce Commission concurring Congress consideration or decision constitutional Cook Inlet corporation counsel Court of Appeals criminal defendant disclosure dissenting District Court evidence Exchange exclusionary rule exempt F Supp federal court filed Fourth Amendment Government held holding illegal infra issue judgment judicial June 16 June 23 jurisdiction jury trial Justice Douglas took L Ed 2d legislation ment Miranda warnings opinion ordinance overbreadth person Petition for writ petitioner plaintiffs proceedings prosecution provides purpose question rates reasonable regulations remanded respondent Securities Sherman Act sion Sixth Amendment Stat statement statute statutory supra Supreme Court tion tional titioner tive United States 422 United States Court violation writ of certiorari