United States Reports, Supreme Court: Cases Argued and Adjudged in the Supreme Court of the United States, 7. sējums;97. sējumsLittle, Brown, 1879 |
Citi izdevumi - Skatīt visu
Bieži izmantoti vārdi un frāzes
act of March action affirmed Alexander Collie alleged Allen Jones amount appears assessments assignment authority bank Bates County bill bonds cents Chaboya charge charter Circuit Court claim claimant collector complainants Confederate Constitution contract corporation cotton court of equity court-martial declared decree deed defendant delivered the opinion demurrer District duty entitled equity evidence exemption fact filed grant held Insurance interest invention issued judgment jurisdiction jury JUSTICE Kansas Pacific Railway lands legislature letters-patent levy liable manufactured March 18 ment Missouri mortgage North Carolina offence officer owner paid parties patent pavement payment person plaintiff in error plea proceedings provisions purchase purpose question Railroad Company rebellion received record repealed road rule sect seizure smoking-tobacco sold Stat statute steam-tug suit Supreme Court taxation Tennessee thereof tion tobacco trust United valid valve void Wall writ of error
Populāri fragmenti
602. lappuse - States, and the decision is in favor of such their validity, or where any title, right, privilege, or immunity is claimed under the constitution or any treaty or statute of, or commission held or authority exercised under, the United States, and the decision is against the title, right, privilege, or exemption specially set up or claimed by either party, under such constitution, treaty, statute, commission, or authority...
738. lappuse - An act [to amend an act entitled an act] to aid in the construction of a railroad and telegraph line from the Missouri River to the Pacific Ocean, and to secure to the Government the use of the same for postal, military, and other purposes, approved July first, eighteen hundred and sixty-two," approved July second, eighteen hundred and sixty-four.
19. lappuse - That the Circuit Courts of the United States shall have original cognizance, concurrent with the courts of the several states, of all suits of a civil nature, at common law or in equity, where the matter in dispute exceeds, exclusive of interest and costs, the sum or value of two thousand dollars, and arising under the Constitution or laws of the United States...
334. lappuse - that the records and judicial proceedings of the Courts of any State, shall be proved or admitted in any other Court within the United States, by the attestation of the clerk, and the seal of the Court annexed, if there be a seal, together with a certificate of the' judge, chief justice, or presiding magistrate, as the case may be, that...
20. lappuse - States are plaintiffs or petitioners, or in which there shall be a controversy between citizens of different States...
514. lappuse - She constitutes a part of the military force of her nation; acts under the immediate and direct command of the sovereign; is employed by him in national objects. He has many and powerful motives for preventing those objects from being defeated by the interference of a foreign state.
33. lappuse - ... property of the citizens, and to the preservation of good order and the public morals. The Legislature cannot, by any contract, divest itself of the power to provide for these objects. They belong emphatically to that class of objects which demand the application of the maxim salus populi...
699. lappuse - The legislature shall have no power to suspend any general law for the benefit of any particular individual, nor to pass any law for the benefit of individuals inconsistent with the general laws of the land...
334. lappuse - And the said records and judicial proceedings, authenticated as aforesaid, shall have such faith and credit given to them in every court within the United States as they have by law or usage in the courts of the State from whence the said records are or shall be taken.
318. lappuse - It is the settled law of this court that when the evidence given at the trial, with all inferences that the jury could justifiably draw from it, is insufficient to support a verdict for the plaintiff, so that such a verdict, if returned, must be set aside, the court is not bound to submit the case to the jury, but may direct a verdict for the defendant.