Family Movie Act of 2004: Hearing Before the Subcommittee on Courts, the Internet, and Intellectual Property of the Committee on the Judiciary, House of Representatives, One Hundred Eighth Congress, Second Session, on H.R. 4586, June 17, 2004U.S. Government Printing Office, 2004 - 93 lappuses |
Citi izdevumi - Skatīt visu
Bieži izmantoti vārdi un frāzes
ACLU Aggression allow Amendment rights American Civil Liberties AMITAI ETZIONI argue believe BERMAN bill block Chairman CHICAGO-KENT LAW REVIEW child pornography children from harmful CHILDREN FROM SPEECH CIPA civil libertarians Civil Liberties Union ClearPlay Committee companies computers Congress copy copyright law copyright owners cultural materials derivative work right discussion Donna Rice edited Eugene Volokh exposure Family Movie Act Fighting Words Doctrine filtering software filtering technology free speech GOODLATTE harmful material hearing infringement Internet issue Jack Valenti Joe Camel Kern County LAW REVIEW Vol legislation Library limited litigation Loudoun County Marjorie Heins Marybeth Peters motion picture mute Nance negotiations nudity Obscenity offensive parents private home viewing programs PROTECTING CHILDREN protection of children question ratings system REVIEW Vol 79:3 scenes sexual SMITH social spillover Stat studies Subcommittee supra note television Thank tion tobacco V-chip Valenti violation violence
Populāri fragmenti
59. lappuse - It is, perhaps, hardly necessary to say that this doctrine is meant to apply only to human beings in the maturity of their faculties. We are not speaking of children, or of young persons below the age which the law may fix as that of manhood or womanhood.
10. lappuse - Section 106(2) of the Copyright Act gives the copyright owner the exclusive right to "prepare derivative works based upon the copyrighted work.
10. lappuse - created" when it is fixed in a copy or phonorecord for the first time; where a work is prepared over a period of time, the portion of it that has been fixed at any particular time constitutes the work as of that time, and where the work has been prepared in different versions, each version constitutes a separate work. A "derivative work...
59. lappuse - Children, I confess, are not born in this full state of equality, though they are born to it. Their parents have a sort of rule and jurisdiction over them when they come into the world, and for some time after, but it is but a temporary one.
36. lappuse - FCC would begin to set the ratings itself, 118 the National Association of Broadcasters, the National Cable Television Association, and the Motion Picture Association of America jointly created the TV Parental Guidelines, a voluntary rating system.
17. lappuse - First of all, constitutional interpretation has consistently recognized that the parents' claim to authority in their own household to direct the rearing of their children is basic in the structure of our society.
15. lappuse - Amitai Etzioni, The New Golden Rule: Community and Morality in a Democratic Society (New York: Basic Books, 1996); Robert D.
35. lappuse - In order to deny minors access to potentially harmful speech, the CDA effectively suppresses a large amount of speech that adults have a constitutional right to receive and to address to one another.
47. lappuse - REVIEW [Vol7fcS lence and sexually inappropriate conduct,i" they repeatedly and systematically find that unfettered exposure is "merely" one major cause for several forms of anti-social behavior. While a large number of studies are simple one-time observations, several rigorous longitudinal studies have been conducted. For instance, the study conducted by Lefkowitz et al., determined that "|t)he relation between boys' preferences for violent television at age eight and their aggressiveness revealed...
70. lappuse - TV violence on young people: 1) children may become less sensitive to the pain and suffering of others; 2) they may be more fearful of the world around them; and 3) they may be more likely to behave in an aggressive or harmful way toward others.