Strengthening Risk Assessment Within EPA: Hearing Before the Subcommittee on Technology, Environment, and Aviation of the Committee on Science, Space, and Technology, U.S. House of Representatives, One Hundred Third Congress, Second Session, March 9, 1994, 4. sējums
United States, United States. Congress. House. Committee on Science, Space, and Technology. Subcommittee on Technology, Environment, and Aviation
U.S. Government Printing Office, 1994 - 144 lappuses
Lietotāju komentāri - Rakstīt atsauksmi
Ierastajās vietās neesam atraduši nevienu atsauksmi.
Citi izdevumi - Skatīt visu
action Administrator advance agencies approach associated assumptions believe better called cancer carcinogens Chairman characterization chemicals Committee communication comparative concern conducting CONGRESS THE LIBRARY consider consistency continue decision default dioxins discussion dose effects efforts environment environmental EPA's estimate example experts exposure Federal going groups guidelines hazard hearing human identify important improve incorporate increase individual industry issues KLEIN lead legislation LIBRARY OF CONGRESS limits look major ment methodologies methods models Office population practice present priorities problems productive proposal question range recently recommendations reduce regulation regulatory require response risk analysis risk assessment risk management rules scientific scientists setting Silbergeld specific standards statutes Subcommittee Technology testimony Thank tion toxic uncertainty understanding
115. lappuse - Such an estimate, however, does not necessarily give a realistic prediction of the risk. The true value of the risk is unknown, and may be as low as zero.
11. lappuse - Administration, the Consumer Product Safety Commission, the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, and the Federal Trade Commission. Congress spends a great deal of time on its oversight function, holding numerous committee hearings in order to review agencies' plans, to influence their behavior along preferred lines, and to promote their objectives.
96. lappuse - Mr. Chairman and members of the subcommittee, and thank you for the opportunity to...
10. lappuse - STATEMENT OF SALLY KATZEN ADMINISTRATOR OFFICE OF INFORMATION AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS OFFICE OF MANAGEMENT AND BUDGET...
10. lappuse - Administration, and the Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs (OIRA) within the Office of Management and Budget.
7. lappuse - Thank you very much, Mr. Chairman, members of the committee. I appreciate very much the opportunity to...
123. lappuse - Footnotes: 1 .This statement reflects the views of the author and does not necessarily represent the views of the Urban Institute, its sponsors, or its board of trustees 2. See G. Kenney, S. Rajan, F. Scheuren, and K. Wang, "National Survey of America's Families: Survey Methods and Data Reliability," Assessing the New Federalism Methodology Paper No.
14. lappuse - The importance of communicating risks to the public is underscored by some studies that demonstrate little correlation between public perception and scientific judgements about the magnitudes of risks for a number of activities. Some have suggested that this is a function of media attention on certain risks that are more easily understood (and hence covered by the mass media) to the detriment of coverage of potentially more harmful, but more complicated, risks. Indeed, other studies show that when...