The Audio and Video Flags: Can Content Protection and Technological Innovation Coexist? : Hearing Before the Subcommittee on Telecommunications Aned the Internet of the Committee on Energy and Commerce, House of Representatives, One Hundred Ninth Congress, Second Session, June 27, 2006, 4. sējums
United States. Congress. House. Committee on Energy and Commerce. Subcommittee on Telecommunications and the Internet
U.S. Government Printing Office, 2006 - 108 lappuses
Lietotāju komentāri - Rakstīt atsauksmi
Ierastajās vietās neesam atraduši nevienu atsauksmi.
Citi izdevumi - Skatīt visu
ability able actually addition addressed allow already analog artists audio flag Audio Home Recording BAINWOL believe bill broadcast flag Chairman channels clear committee Communications companies compensation concerned Congress consumers content protection copy create creators developed devices digital broadcast digital radio digital television discussion distribution fact fair FERGUSON give going Harris hearing Home Recording Act implement important innovation interest Internet iPod issue kind legislation LEVIN license limited listen look mandate manufacturers marketplace mean million music industry negotiations offer owners performance play prevent problem programming proposal question reasonable receive recording industry redistribution require royalties rules satellite radio shows Sirius solution songs songwriters sound statement stations subcommittee talk technical television Thank thing UPTON video flag ZIEGLER
43. lappuse - ... (1) the purpose and character of the use, including whether such use is of a commercial nature or is for nonprofit educational purposes; (2) the nature of the copyrighted work; (3) the amount and substantiality of the portion used in relation to the copyrighted work as a whole; and (4) the effect of the use upon the potential market for or value of the copyrighted work.
34. lappuse - Specifically, it is not the intention of the Committee to restrain the home recording, from broadcasts or from tapes or records, of recorded performances, where the home recording is for private use and with no purpose of reproducing or otherwise capitalizing commercially on it.
80. lappuse - No action may be brought under this title alleging infringement of copyright based on the manufacture, importation, or distribution of a digital audio recording device, a digital audio recording medium, an analog recording device, or an analog recording medium, or based on the noncommercial use by a consumer of such a device or medium for making digital musical recordings or analog musical recordings.
79. lappuse - Act will eliminate the legal uncertainty about home audio taping that has clouded the marketplace. The bill will bar copyright infringement lawsuits for both analog and digital audio home recording by consumers, and for the sale of audio recording equipment by manufacturers and importers. It thus will allow consumer electronics manufacturers to introduce new audio technology into the market without fear of infringement lawsuits...
11. lappuse - A REPRESENTATIVE IN CONGRESS FROM THE STATE OF NEW YORK THANK YOU, MR. CHAIRMAN. I CONGRATULATE YOU FOR HOLDING TODAY'S HEARING.
24. lappuse - In approving the creation of a limited copyright in sound recordings it is the intention of the Committee that this limited copyright not grant any broader rights than are accorded to other copyright proprietors under the existing title 1 7.
79. lappuse - ... customary enjoyment of these services by consumers, and put those controls solely in the hands of the record companies. The Congress has consistently declined to do so. As a result, the United States remains a world leader in developing new broadcast and consumer technologies and services. Second, Congress did address the advent of digital recording by passing a law in 1992 that went in a different and opposite direction. As you know, the Audio Home Recording Act provides for a royalty payment...
91. lappuse - CRS concluded there that While the broadcast flag is intended to "prevent the indiscriminate redistribution of [digital broadcast] content over the Internet or through similar means," the goal of the flag was not to impede a consumer's ability to copy or use content lawfully in the home, nor was the policy intended to "foreclose use of the Internet to send digital broadcast content where it can be...