...a scienter, which it is not necessary for us to consider ; such, for instance, as that every person is presumed to intend the natural and probable consequences of his acts. — 1 Bishop on Criminal Law, 248. From the proposition, that the criminality of supplying poisonous...

...intended to do so before that time, the evidence of that intention in this record is imperceptible. A man is presumed to intend the natural and probable consequences of his acts. The consequences of the acts of Grumbles here were that, although he delivere'! to his wife the dormant...

...province of the jury. The sixth asserts the familiar principle of the law of evidence, that a man must be presumed to intend the natural and probable consequences of his acts, and from it draws the conclusion, " that if • Simpson v. State. man shoots another with a deadly weapon...

...a question of law, and includes the question whether they constitute proof of the intent. A person is presumed to intend the natural and probable consequences of his acts; and when the acts of a landlord u]K>n the demised premises are such as naturally and probably exclude the tenant...

...infer that he Intended to cause death." This instruction is also erroneous. While it is true that a man is presumed to intend the natural and probable consequences of his acts, It is true, also, that the presumption arising from the acts alone never extends beyond the actual...

...instruction was given, which defendant objected to: ''You are further instructed that every sane man is presumed to intend the natural and probable consequences of his acts." It is insisted that this instruction, while a correct one in a murder case where death had resulted,...

...to be sufficient proof of publication by the defendant, upon the well-settled principle that a man is presumed to intend the natural and probable consequences of his acts. That case, as O'Neall, J., says, in Fonville v. McNease, supra, constitutes an exception to the rule...

...general principle which runs through all tort cases, which is generally stated in this way : That a man is presumed to intend the natural and probable consequences of his acts, and that instruction therefore should be qualified in that way. He is not responsible for the injurious...

...general principle which runs through all tort cases, which is generally stated in this way: that a man is presumed to intend the natural and probable consequences of his acts, and that request for instruction therefore should be qualified in that way. He is not responsible for the...

...Commonwealth v. York (1845), 9 Met. 93; SC, 1 Lead. Crim. Cas. 322; SC, 43 Am. Dec. 373. MALICE: One is presumed to intend the natural and probable consequences of his acts. Hadley v. Baxendale; Scott v. Shepherd. Comniunis error facit jus: Common error sometimes passes current...