The Buyer's Remedies for Non-conforming Goods: Should There be Free Choice Or are Restrictions Necessary?

Pirmais vāks
sellier. european law publ., 2005 - 265 lappuses
0 Atsauksmes
Atsauksmes netiek pārbaudītas, taču Google meklē viltus saturu un noņem to, ja tāds tiek identificēts.
This study analyses the buyer's remedies for non-conforming goods under a sales contract under English, German, French and Scandinavian law. Moreover, the EC Consumer Sales Directive, the 1980 UN Convention on Contracts for the International Sale of Goods (CISG) and the Principles of European Contract Law (PECL) are included. The study examines the most controversial issues and problems involved in the establishment of an effective and fair remedial regime for non-conforming goods. Should there be a certain hierarchy of remedies, where some prevail over others? Who should be able to choose between the remedies, the buyer or the seller, and should there be a right for the seller to impose cure upon the buyer? Should certain remedies be restricted where the lack of conformity is not sufficiently serious? Another controversial issue is the question of whether, and if so, how the buyer should be obliged to notify the seller, and within which time limits he should be obliged to bring forward his claim.

No grāmatas satura

Lietotāju komentāri - Rakstīt atsauksmi

Ierastajās vietās neesam atraduši nevienu atsauksmi.

Saturs

Chapter I
1
What is a remedy?
7
National legislation
17
Chapter II
29
Price reduction
59
Termination
68
Damages
81
Chapter III
101
Minor nonconformity
144
Conclusion
150
Chapter VI
157
Differentiation through time limits
179
Chapter VII
205
Law Economics
221
Price reduction
235
Distinction due to type of transaction
250

Chapter IV
121
Damages as substitute
127
Chapter V
133
Curriculum vitae
265
Autortiesības

Bieži izmantoti vārdi un frāzes

Bibliogrāfiskā informācija