 | 1882 - 1904 lapas
...the court in Roberts v. Ryer, 91 US 150, Chief Justice Waite says : "It is no new invention to use an old machine for a new purpose. The inventor of a machine...whether he had conceived the idea of the use or not." And, says Justice Story, in Bean v. Smattwood, % Story, 408: " The thing itself which is patented must... | |
 | 1884 - 1902 lapas
...As said by the supreme court in Roberts v. Ryer, 91 US 150, 157 : "It is no new invention to use an old machine for a new purpose. The inventor of a machine...uses to which it can be put, no matter whether he had cancel red the idea of the use or not." See, also, Stowe v. City of Chicago, 21 0. G. 790. The sixth... | |
 | 1881 - 1014 lapas
...improvements, each of which is or may be auxiliary to produce the same general result. The invenior of a machine is entitled to the benefit of all the uses to which it can be put, no matter whether he conceived the idea of the use or not. An "improved driving gearing," included in the specification... | |
 | 1881 - 982 lapas
...machines or improvements, each of which is or may be auxiliary to produce the same general result. The inventor of a machine is entitled to the benefit of all the uses to which it can be put, no mutter whether he conceived the idea of the use or not. An "improved driving gearing," included in... | |
 | Hubert Ashley Banning, United States. Circuit Courts - 1883 - 730 lapas
...patent." And again, in Roberts v. Ryer, 1 Otto, 157, it is said: " It is no new invention to use an old machine for a new purpose. The inventor of a machine...whether he had conceived the idea of the use or not.'' It is not understood, however, that these principles are to be so applied as to deny patentability... | |
 | United States. Supreme Court - 1885 - 1072 lapas
...for the same purpose, he could claim such use as a new invention. It is no new invention to use an old machine for a new purpose. The inventor of a machine...whether he had conceived the idea of the use or not. Lyman had the descending current. True, he concentrated the air as it fell, and sent it downwards through... | |
 | United States. Supreme Court - 1889 - 684 lapas
...SHAW. J. FRANCIS LoniNO, WILLIAM STRONG. Argument of counsel. Mr. Arthur ». Briesen, for appellant : The inventor of a machine is entitled to the benefit...whether he had conceived the idea of the use or not. Smith v. Nichols, 21 Wall. 112 [9 Am. & Eng. 425 ;] Roberts v. Ryer, 91 US 150 [10 Am. & Eng. 302;]... | |
 | United States. Supreme Court - 1892 - 760 lapas
...no new invention to use an old machine for a new purpose. The inventor of a machine is entitled to all the uses to which it can be put, no matter whether he had conceived the idea of the use or not." In Pennsylvania Railway v. Locomotive Truck Co., 110 US 490, 494, the adoption of a truck for locomotives... | |
 | United States. Supreme Court - 1892 - 1132 lapas
...is no new invention louse an old machine for a new purpose. The inventor of a machine is entitled to all the uses to which it can be put, no matter whether he had conceived the idea of tbe use or not." In I'fiinaylrania It. Co. v. Locomo/iec EngineA A T.(.'o., 110 US 490, 494 (28: 223,... | |
| |
it is no new invention to use an old machine for a new purpose. The inventor of a machine is entitled to all the uses to which it can be put, no matter whether he had conceived the idea of the use or not. 
