Decisions of the Commissioner of Patents and of the United States Courts in Patent and Trade-mark and Copyright Cases, 917. sējumsU.S. Government Printing Office, 1918 "Compiled from Official gazette. Beginning with 1876, the volumes have included also decisions of United States courts, decisions of Secretary of Interior, opinions of Attorney-General, and important decisions of state courts in relation to patents, trade-marks, etc. 1869-94, not in Congressional set." Checklist of U. S. public documents, 1789-1909, p. 530. |
No grāmatas satura
1.–5. rezultāts no 100.
ix. lappuse
... evidence of when later patent covers an invention made before issue of earlier patent . dWm . F. Goessling Box Co. et al . v . Gumb et al__ Appealed case , claiming substantially same invention in terms of appa- ratus as when before the ...
... evidence of when later patent covers an invention made before issue of earlier patent . dWm . F. Goessling Box Co. et al . v . Gumb et al__ Appealed case , claiming substantially same invention in terms of appa- ratus as when before the ...
xii. lappuse
... evidence furnishes no substantial sup- port for a decree . d Gold et al . v . Gold ‒‒‒‒‒‒ Delay in filing application due to state of war ; reciprocal privileges as- sumed ; German patent not bar to grant of United States patent . Ex ...
... evidence furnishes no substantial sup- port for a decree . d Gold et al . v . Gold ‒‒‒‒‒‒ Delay in filing application due to state of war ; reciprocal privileges as- sumed ; German patent not bar to grant of United States patent . Ex ...
xiv. lappuse
... evidence invention patentably different prior to date of opponent , entitled to claim broad enough to cover both forms despite of ad- verse decision in interference . In re Klahn____ Interference proceedings , not for the purpose of ...
... evidence invention patentably different prior to date of opponent , entitled to claim broad enough to cover both forms despite of ad- verse decision in interference . In re Klahn____ Interference proceedings , not for the purpose of ...
xvii. lappuse
... evidence must be most convincing . b Friedley - Voshardt Co. v . Reliance Metal Spinning Co. 62 32 103 Priority of invention : Auxiliary devices not in issue not to be considered . * Neckerman v . Saunders 157 Award of- * Bayer and ...
... evidence must be most convincing . b Friedley - Voshardt Co. v . Reliance Metal Spinning Co. 62 32 103 Priority of invention : Auxiliary devices not in issue not to be considered . * Neckerman v . Saunders 157 Award of- * Bayer and ...
xix. lappuse
... evidence allowable in part . a Merrill v . Ewing , Commissioner of Patents___ . Effect of decisions of the Patent Office . d Gold et al . v . Gold__ . Issue not limited to question of priority of invention between parties , but ...
... evidence allowable in part . a Merrill v . Ewing , Commissioner of Patents___ . Effect of decisions of the Patent Office . d Gold et al . v . Gold__ . Issue not limited to question of priority of invention between parties , but ...
Saturs
160 | |
163 | |
189 | |
209 | |
214 | |
241 | |
249 | |
268 | |
53 | |
56 | |
73 | |
77 | |
79 | |
89 | |
103 | |
118 | |
141 | |
148 | |
269 | |
295 | |
296 | |
312 | |
322 | |
330 | |
391 | |
410 | |
429 | |
Citi izdevumi - Skatīt visu
Bieži izmantoti vārdi un frāzes
affirmed alleged amended apparatus appellant's appellee applicant's application assignee awarded bill bottling Circuit Court Coca-Cola combination Commissioner of Patents Company connection Conrader Construction of Claims Court of Appeals cover Cropp Decided decision decree defendant defendant's described descriptive device disclaimer disclosed disclosure district court District of Columbia double patenting elements Elyria evidence Examiner of Interferences Examiners-in-Chief fact filed filler flanges granted heat Held infringed interference proceeding inventor issue Letters Patent license limited machine manufacture mark material means mechanism metal misthread motion Mutt and Jeff operation opinion original party patent in suit Patent Office petitioner plaintiff plate portion present pressure-governor prior art priority of invention produced purpose question reason reduction to practice reference Registration of Trade-Marks reissue Res Adjudicata result rule shown shows specification speed speed-governor structure substantially testimony thereof tion Trade-Mark Act Uehling United valid word
Populāri fragmenti
413. lappuse - Whenever an application is made for a patent which, in the opinion of the Commissioner, would interfere with any pending application, or with any unexpired patent, he shall give notice thereof to the applicants, or applicant and patentee, as the case may be. The question of priority of invention...
243. lappuse - That no article of imported merchandise which shall copy or simulate the name of any domestic manufacture, or manufacturer, or trader, or of any manufacturer or trader located in any foreign country which, by treaty, convention, or law affords similar privileges to citizens of the United States...
411. lappuse - The Commissioner of Patents, subject to the approval of the Secretary of the Interior, may from time to time establish regulations, not inconsistent with law, for the conduct of proceedings in the Patent Office.
355. lappuse - Whenever a patent on application is refused, either by the Commissioner of Patents or by the Supreme Court of the District of Columbia upon appeal from the Commissioner, the applicant may have remedy by bill in equity ; and the court having cognizance thereof, on notice to adverse parties and other due proceedings had...
157. lappuse - it is no new invention to use an old machine for a new purpose. The inventor of a machine is entitled to all the uses to which it can be put, no matter whether he had conceived the idea of the use or not.
168. lappuse - ... which so nearly resemble a registered or known trademark owned and in use by another, and appropriated to merchandise of the same descriptive properties, as to be likely to cause confusion or mistake in the mind of the public, or to deceive purchasers...
355. lappuse - ... or for any part thereof, as the facts in the case may appear. And such adjudication, if it be in favor of the right of the applicant, shall authorize the commissioner to issue such patent on the applicant filing in the Patent Office a copy of the adjudication and otherwise complying with the requirements of law. In all cases where there is no opposing party a copy of the bill shall be served on the commissioner; and all the expenses of the proceeding shall be paid by the applicant, whether the...
396. lappuse - Office to any person who has invented or discovered any new and useful art, machine, manufacture, or composition of matter...
427. lappuse - property' as applied to trademarks and trade secrets is an unanalyzed expression of certain secondary consequences of the primary fact that the law makes some rudimentary requirements of good faith.
146. lappuse - S51, that there is a difference between the effect of a judgment as a bar or estoppel against the prosecution of a second action upon the same claim or demand, and its effect as an estoppel in another action between the same parties upon a different claim or cause of action; in the former case the judgment, if rendered upon the merits, constitutes an absolute bar to a subsequent action.