Lapas attēli
PDF
ePub
[blocks in formation]

No. 690, Misc. HOLDERFIELD v. RAGEN, WARDEN. Circuit Court of Franklin County, Illinois. Certiorari denied.

No. 691, Misc. UNITED STATES EX REL. ROONEY ET AL. v. RAGEN, WARDEN. C. A. 7th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 173 F. 2d 668.

No. 692, Misc. COLLINS v. DUFFY, WARDEN. Supreme Court of California. Certiorari denied.

Rehearing Granted. (See Nos. 386 and 443, supra.)

Rehearing Denied.

No. 156. DONOVAN V. QUEENSBORO CORPORATION ET AL.; and

No. 49, Misc. DONOVAN V. QUEENSBORO CORPORATION ET AL., 335 U. S. 804. Motion for leave to file petition for rehearing denied.

No. 513. BURNHAM CHEMICAL Co. v. BORAX CONSOLIDATED, LTD. ET AL., 336 U. S. 924. The motion for an extension of time within which to file a second petition for rehearing is denied.

No. 647. MOMAND v. UNIVERSAL FILM EXCHANGES, INC. ET AL., 336 U. S. 967. Second petition for rehearing denied.

No. 671. WILLIAMS v. NEW YORK, 337 U. S. 241. Petition for rehearing and motion for a stay of mandate denied.

No. 708. SONNESEN v. PANAMA TRANSPORT Co., 337 U. S. 919. The motion to enlarge the time to file petition for rehearing is denied.

[blocks in formation]

No. 805. DOLES v. METROPOLITAN LIFE INSURANCE Co., 337 U. S. 922. Rehearing denied.

No. 425, Misc. HASSON v. UNITED STATES, 337 U. S. 932. Rehearing denied.

No. 437, Misc. TATE v. CALIFORNIA, 337 U. S. 903. Rehearing denied.

No. 489, Misc. BUTLER V. PENIX, RECEIVER, 337 U. S. 926. Rehearing denied.

STATEMENT SHOWING THE NUMBER OF CASES FILED, DISPOSED OF, AND REMAINING ON DOCKETS, AT CONCLUSION OF OCTOBER TERMS-1946, 1947, AND 1948

[merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][subsumed][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][subsumed][ocr errors][subsumed][merged small][merged small][merged small][subsumed][merged small][subsumed][merged small][ocr errors][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small]

ACCOUNTS RECEIVABLE. See Constitutional Law, VIII, 2.
ADMINISTRATIVE LAW. See Constitutional Law, VII, 1;
Labor, 2; Procedure, 6.

ADMIRALTY. See also Eminent Domain.

1. General agent-Liability-Negligence of ship's officers.-Gen-
eral agent of United States under standard service agreement not
liable under Jones Act to seaman injured through negligence of ship's
officers. Cosmopolitan Shipping Co. v. McAllister, 783; Fink v.
Shepard S. S. Co., 810.

2. Id.-General agent of United States under standard service
agreement as not liable to passengers for wrongful act of member of
ship's crew. Weade v. Dichmann Co., 801.

3. General agent-Liability-Wages, maintenance and cure.-Gen-
eral agent of United States under standard service agreement not
liable to seaman for wages and maintenance and cure. Fink v.
Shepard S. S. Co., 810..

AD VALOREM TAX. See Constitutional Law, V, 2.

AGENCY. See Admiralty.

AGRICULTURE. See Labor, 3.

ALASKA.

1. Fisheries-Conservation-White Act-Anti-monopoly proviso.-
Regulation prohibiting commercial fishing in Karluk Reservation ex-
cept by natives or their licensees, void. Hynes v. Grimes Packing
Co., 86.

2. Indian reservations-Designation-Coastal waters.-Secretary
of Interior authorized to include coastal waters in Karluk Reserva-
tion. Hynes v. Grimes Packing Co., 86.

ALIEN PROPERTY CUSTODIAN.

ALIENS. See Taxation, 2; War.

See War.

ANTICIPATED PROFITS. See Contracts.
ANTITRUST ACTS. See also Venue, 3.

Clayton Act-Violations-Exclusive purchase agreements.-Con-
tracts of oil company with independent dealers in 7-state area re-
quiring dealers to purchase exclusively from oil company, violated
Clayton Act; sufficiency of proof of effect of contracts; contracts
with California dealers not exempt though for local products. Stand-
ard Oil Co. v. United States, 293.

965

« iepriekšējāTurpināt »