 Whatever may be the origin, artificial or natural, of the initial variation from which it has resulted, the variety must be clearly distinguishable by one or more important characteristics from any other variety whose existence is a matter of common knowledge...  The Management of Intellectual Property - 36. lappuseautors: D. Bosworth - 2006 - 352 lapasIerobežota priekšskatīšana - Par šo grāmatu
 | Konrad E. Zweigert, Gert Kolle, Jan Kropholler, Hans Peter Kunz-Hallstein - 1980 - 1346 lapas
...resulted, the new variety must be clearly distinguishable by one or more important characteristics from any other variety whose existence is a matter of common knowledge at the time when protection is applied for. Common knowledge may be established by reference to various... | |
 | Konrad Zweigert, Jan Kropholler - 1973 - 1436 lapas
...resulted, the new variety must be clearly distinguishable by one or more important characteristics from any other variety whose existence is a matter of common knowledge at the time when protection is applied for. Common knowledge may be established by various references... | |
 | Amos Jenkins Peaslee, Dorothy Peaslee Xydis - 1975 - 690 lapas
...resulted, the new variety must be clearly distinguishable by one or more important characteristics from any other variety whose existence is a matter of common knowledge at the time when protection is applied for. Common knowledge may be established by various references... | |
 | Darrell Addison Posey, Graham Dutfield - 1996 - 324 lapas
...must be — Distinct (the most important requirement): distinguishable by one or more characteristics from any other variety whose existence is a matter of common knowledge; — Stable: remain true to its description after repeated reproduction or propagation; — Uniform:... | |
 | P. Van der Kooij - 1997 - 272 lapas
...expression of the characteristics that results from a particular genotype or combination of genotypes, from any other variety whose existence is a matter of common knowledge on the date of application determined pursuant to Article 51. 2. The existence of another variety shall... | |
 | Michael Patrick Ryan - 1998 - 278 lapas
...demanding than the originality standard of copyright law. The variety must be "distinct," that is, "distinguishable from any other variety whose existence is a matter of common knowledge at the time of the application." It must be sufficiently "uniform" in its "relevant characteristics."... | |
 | Spiridon E. Kintzios - 2000 - 307 lapas
...possibilities to plant breeders to protect their varieties. Distinctness The variety shall be deemed to be distinct if it is clearly distinguishable from any...variety whose existence is a matter of common knowledge at the time of the filing of the application. In particular, the filing of an application for the granting... | |
 | C. L. Hedley - 2001 - 360 lapas
...For a variety to be distinct, it must be clearly distinguishable by one or more important characters from any other variety, whose existence is a matter of common knowledge at the time when protection by a grant of rights is sought. A variety is required to be sufficiently... | |
 | Marie-Flore Célarier, Delphine Marie-Vivien - 2002 - 110 lapas
...notify thé SecretaryCeneral accordingly. • Article 7 : Distinctness The variety shall be deemed to be distinct if it is clearly distinguishable from any...variety whose existence is a matter of common knowledge at thé time of thé filing of thé application. In particular, thé filing of an application for thé... | |
 | A. Vainstein - 2002 - 408 lapas
...of distinctness is met if, at the time of filing the application for a breeder's right, the variety "is clearly distinguishable from any other variety whose existence is a matter of common knowledge." The filing of an application for granting a breeder's right, in any UPOV country, brings the said variety... | |
| |
