Lapas attēli
PDF
ePub

honest use by a man of his own name, an interference which I think is entirely novel to the law of England." The learned judges might have found a case exactly in point to the same effect in Meneely v. Meneely, 62 N. Y. 427; S. C., 20 Am. Rep. 489

LAW AND DOCTORS IN NEW YORK.

I,

[ocr errors]

That veracious historian of New York, the lamented Diedrich Knickerbocker, assures us, in a sentimental parenthesis, that there is something exceedingly delusive in looking back through the long vista of departed years, and catching a glimpse of the fairy realm of antiquity that lies beyond. Like some goodly landscape melting into distance, they receive a thousand charms from their very obscurity, and the fancy delights to fill up their outlines with graces and excellences of its own creation."

I have fully realized the delusiveness of antiquarian researches, in my attempts to find some trace of the physician during the halcyon days of New Amsterdam. The thrifty Dutch burghers who bought Manhattan island for $24 were probably healthy people, and had little need for the medical profession. The days of Van Twiller, Kieft and Stuyvesant, were not productive of a high scientific development. Mrs. Lamb, in her History of the City of New York, makes no mention of the medical profession during the Colonial period; and during that period, covering more than one hundred and fifty years, only three times was this profession the subject of legislation. January 17, 1680, the legislative counsel ordered that no one should practice physic without a license. This was doubtless the origin of licensing physicians. In 1684, October 22, an act was passed concerning surgeons and midwives, and in 1760, June 10, an act was passed to "regulate the practice of physic and surgery in the city of New York." But though meager was his place in our early history, we know that the disciple of Esculapius has been abroad in the world in all ages, and among all people. Sometimes he has turned aside from his profession to do other work for the world, in literature, in statesmanship, in war, in discovery, in reform, and in religion. Every department of human endeavor has felt bis influence and enjoyed the benefit of his cultivated experience. Looking back into history we recall the fact that the record of the establishment of Christianity by the apostles, and the third Gospel, were written by a physician; and we cannot fail to be impressed by the exact professional knowledge, the broad humanity, and the reverent affection for his master, which characterize Luke's biography of our Lord. Coming to a later time, we recollect that Dr. Warren left his patients to defend the liberties of the Colonies, and won immortality by his gallant death at Bunker Hill; and it was a physician, the lamented Livingstone, who first carried the light of civilization into the recesses of the dark continent. While he has labored, the physician has also suffered. We might recall numerous instances where physicians have become martyrs to the mysteries of the laboratory, martyrs to the dangers and contagions of the sick room, martyrs to their devotion to the physical well-being of their fellowmen.

Dr. Samuel Johnson, the eminent English critic, once described lawyers as a class of men who go through life with their faces toward the past. While this statement of fact here is in a sense true, the criticism implied is unjust. Lawyers look into the future for clients, and into the past for precedents. It would be intolerable if a court should make law according to its own whim, or if lawyers should advise according to their prejudices. The question always is, what is the

law? and we can only answer by turning our faces toward the past to see what has been legislated or decided in the particular instance. It has been the aim of all jurisprudence, from the consummate legal fabric of the Roman Empire to our own judicial system, to establish upon a firm basis the proposition that the general certainty of the law is of more consequence than that it shall work out exact justice in every case. There is not a legal remedy for every wrong, neither is there a cure for every disease. "The past" does not mean antiquity alone; yesterday is a part of the past, and what we must do is to try to adjust the complications of to-day to the principle already established by the wisdom of experience.

I have often thought, and sometimes with a feeling akin to envy — that the physician is not hampered by the conservatism which necessarily environs the lawyer. Medicine is essentially an experimental science; and while there are certain general principles, as in the law, which have been established bya large experience -the medical practitioner must, nevertheless, apply a discerning judgment in the treatment of diseases, varying with the peculiarities of each case. Therapeutics is an expansive study, and no man will ever be able to say that he has reached its limit. Out of the rude knowledge, and the ruder practice of early ages, the growth of medicine has kept pace with the development of general science, and to-day no branch of knowledge ranks higher than this. During all these years the work and study of the profession have greatly broadened; its literature has constantly expanded; its mission has been elevated and extended; its standards of proficiency have been lifted higher and higher, corresponding with its increasing influence in society; and it is but natural that physicians and surgeons should desire legal protection against quackery, and the annoyance of those who, without proper study, and without a due appreciation of the great importance of the science and practice of medicine, assume and presume to be as competent [as those who have devoted years of study, and who have had years of experience in preparing themselves to properly minister to the ills that flesh is heir to. Hence the attempt in these modern days to guard against impostors, and to compel by law compliance with certain prescribed standards of qualification before permitting persons to enter upon the practice of the healing art.

Reference has already been made to the Colonial statutes upon this subject. The State government was organized in 1777; since that time statutory regulation of medicine has become firmly established.

The first act regulating the practice of medicine, after the organization of the State government, was passed March 27, 1792 (chap. 37), and related solely to the city and county of New York. That was an age of preambles, and this statute was ornamented with one in which the reasons for the law were set forth as follows:

[ocr errors]

Whereas, many ignorant and unskillful persons presume to administer physic and practice surgery within the city and county of New York, to the detriment and hazard of the lives and limbs of the citizens thereof, for the prevention of such abuses in future," it was enacted that no person whatsoever should practice medicine or surgery unless attending two years with a competent physician, if a graduate of an American college; if not such graduate, he must attend with such physician three years, and must be examined, approved of and admitted by the gov ernor, chancellor, judges of the Supreme Court, attorney-general, the mayor or recorder of the city, or any two of them, taking to their assistance any three respectable physicians, except tutors of such applicants. A penalty was imposed for practicing without a certificate. Persons not qualified

might administer medical aid in any sudden emergency, without compensation. Medical graduates were not affected by the act. In 1797, chapter 45, this act, with some modificatious, was extended to the whole State. Non-residents were not allowed to practice here, except upon the special request of a physician within the State. Certificates of qualification were required to be filed in the county clerk's office. In 1801. chapter 144, a new act was passed, adding new requisites to the qualifications of practitioners, and permitting non-residents to practice here at their option. Laymen might give medical aid in sudden emergencies, without compensation, as in former statutes.

A statute passed in 1806 expressly declared that any person who should commence practice after the first day of September then next, without being duly licensed should "forever thereafter be disqualified from collecting any debt or debts incurred by such practice." The Revised Laws of 1813, and the Revised Statutes, which took effect January 1, 1830, contained regulations concerning medical practice, the latter statute making the unauthorized practice a misdemeanor. The statute of 1830, chapter 126, made the offense penal instead of criminal, and also declared that such penal provisions should not "be deemed and taken to extend to or debar any person from using or applying, for the benefit of any sick person, any roots, barks or herbs, the growth or produce of the United States." By this statute "quackery ceased to be a crime, and if confined to the use of domestic roots, barks and herbs, it was not even a penal offense." In 1834, an act was passed confining the exemptions from the penal provision of the act of 1830, to those who used domestic roots, etc., without fee or reward. The law of 1834 was repealed in 1835, thus restoring the act of 1830. The law remained in this condition until 1844, when the Legislature swept away all criminal and penal laws against the unlicensed practice of physic and surgery, and every enactment which prohibited any person from recovering a compensation for services as a physician or surgeon, whether licensed or not. While statutes still remained in force relating to the examination and licensing of physicians, they were practically a dead letter, because any person could practice without license, and recover compensation for his service.

In 1872 (chap. 746), an act was passed relating to the examination of candidates for the degree of doctor of medicine, and it provided for the appointment by the regents of the university of the State of New York, of one or more boards of examiners in medicine, such board to consist of not less than seven members, who shall have been licensed to practice physic and surgery in this State.

The regents, in their report to the Legislature in 1888, state that then such boards have been organized, and now have a legal existence, giving the names of the members. The oldest of these boards was appointed on the nomination of the State Homoeopathic Society, and consisted of nine members. There is also a board of eight members, nominated by the State Medical Society. A third board of seven members, represents the Eclectic School of Medicine.

Such boards are required to faithfully examine all candidates referred to them for that purpose by the chancellor of the university, and furnish him a detailed report of all the questions and answers of each examination, together with a separate written opinion of each examiner as to the requirements and merits of the candidates in each case.

Such examinations shall be in anatomy, physiology, materia medica, pathology, histology, clinical medicine, chemistry, surgery, mid-wifery and therapeutics, according to each of the systems of practice represented by the several medical societies of this State. The examinations, and the reports of the examiners,

and their opinious, are to be a part of the public records of the university. Candidates for examination must be over twenty-one years of age, of good moral character, must have a competent knowledge of all the branches of learning taught in the common schools of this State, and of the Latin language, and must have diligently studied medicine not less than three years, under the direction of a duly qualified physician, or must have been licensed, on examination, by some medical society or college, legally empowered to issue licenses or degrees of medicine. If not less than five members of a board of examiners vote in favor of a candidate, the regents shall issue to him or her a diploma conferring the degree of doctor of medicine of the University of the State of New York, which degree shall be a license to practice physic and surgery. Candidates are required to pay into the treasury of the university a preliminary fee of not less than $35, and upon receiving a diploma, a further sum of not less than $10.

This statute is still in force, and is recognized in the Medical Code of 1887, hereafter quoted.

From 1844 to 1874, the practice of medicine in this State was free to everybody. During this period of thirty years, quackery was triumphant, and a gullible public became the victims of all sorts of charlatanry. The Legislature of 1844 made every man a doctor, and nostrums of every description and admixture could be safely prescribed, and payment therefor exacted by authority of law. Other States had suffered by the same looseness in medical legislation. In Massachusetts, Thompson, the originator of the steam practice, had been indicted and tried for murder, for having killed a patient with steam and lobelia, but the Supreme Court of that State held that as there was no law prohibiting him from practicing without a license, he could not be convicted either of murder or manslaughter, if he administered the medicine, which killed the patient, through ignorance of its dangerous character, and with an honest intention and belief that the same would cure instead of killing the person to whom it was given. See G Paige, 586

[ocr errors]

In 1874, chapter 436, an attempt was again made to regulate the practice of medicine and surgery, by the enactment of a statute, requiring all practitioners to procure a certificate of their qualifications from the censors of some medical society, such certificate to be recorded in the county clerk's office; and persons not qualified to practice, either by such certificate, or by a license or diploma, from some chartered school, State board of medical examiners, or medical society, were declared guilty of a misdemeanor, and punishable by fine or imprisonment.

This statute continued in force until 1880, when a new license law was passed, chapter 513, requiring registration under regulations prescribed by the stat ute. The law was incomplete in some of its details, and created some confusion in the methods of acquir. ing and retaining a right to practice medicine and surgery. The law was amended in 1881 and in 1884, but was repealed by the Medical Code of 1887.

There was a general revision of the statutes relating to this subject in 1887 (chap. 647).

This statute provides that "no person shall practice physic or surgery in this State who shall not have attained the age of twenty-one years, nor unless already registered and licensed when the act took effect, or thereafter licensed and registered as prescribed by the act; and no persons were to be deemed so licensed or authorized to practice physic or surgery, by the act, except one of the three following classes:

First. All who shall have been graduated from an incorporated medical school or college, in this State, with the degree of doctor of medicine, after substan tial compliance with all the requirements of the general laws and of the charter of said corporation regu

lating the term and amount of study, attendance and attainment requisite to obtain said degree, provided that no person shall receive the degree of doctor of medicine, or be licensed to practice physic or surgery in this State, unless after the age of eighteen years, he shall have pursued the study of medical science for at least three years in a chartered medical school or with some physician and surgeon duly authorized by law to practice physic or surgery; and shall have attended two complete courses of lectures in some legally incorporated medical school or college, in good standing at the time of such attendance, prior to the granting to him or her a diploma or license; provided further, that two courses of lectures, both of which shall be either begun or completed within the same calendar year, shall not satisfy the above requirement.

Second. All who have received said degree from the regents of the university of the State of New York, after substantial compliance with the legal requisites preliminary to its attainment, and after an examination by a legally coustituted board of medical examiners of this State.

(This refers to the statute of 1872, already quoted, giving the regents the authority to grant medical diplomas after examination as prescribed by the act.)

Third. All who, having been graduated from incorporated medical schools or colleges without the State as doctors of medicine, or licensed to practice physic or surgery under the laws of those European countries in which said degree does not confer the right so to practice, shall procure their diplomas from such corporation, or their licenses from such countries to be indorsed by the faculty of an incorporated medical school or college within this State, or by the regents of the university on the recommendation of a legally constituted board of medical examiners of this State. The statute prescribes the form of the indorsement. Every corporation or board so indorsing shall keep a a record of such indorsements, and may require applicants to verify their statements under oath. Persons indorsing such diplomas with fraudulent intent or with gross carelessness or ignorance, shall be deemed guilty of a misdemeanor, and upon conviction shall be fined $250.

Persons entitled to practice medicine are required to register in a book to be kept in the clerk's office of the county where the practice is carried on, his or her name, residence, place and date of birth, and authority for practicing. An applicant for registration must also make an affidavit, the form of which is prescribed by the statute, stating his name, place and date of birth, and residence, the source of his authority to practice, that he has complied with all the requirements of law concerning study, etc.; that he paid no money for the degreee or diploma except the regular fee; that the procurement of said degree or diploma was free from any fraud, misrepresentation or mistake in any material regard; and in case of a foreign license or diploma, that it has been indorsed as required by the statute.

The applicant must also exhibit to the county clerk his or her license or diploma, or a certified copy of it, and the clerk must indorse thereon the date of registry, and shall also give to the applicant a certificate stating the fact of such registry, and the substance of the affidavit. Practicing physicians or surgeons, duly registered, who shall remove their practice or part thereof, or regularly engage in practice, or open an office in another county, shall procure their certificates to be indorsed by the clerk of such other county.

Persons not registered at the time the act was passed, June 23, 1887, bad until October 1 of that year, to register under the laws of 1880. Since that date registration could only be made by complying with the

statute of 1887. Persons convicted of a felony cannot be licensed to practice medicine. Licensed persous who are convicted of a felony, are by the fact of such conviction, deprived of their license to practice. Persons making a false affidavit to procure registration are guilty of perjury. Persons guilty of counterfeiting or forging a diploma, license or certificate are guilty of forgery in the second degree. Practicing under a false or assumed name, or falsely personating another practitioner, is a felony, "and any person guilty of violating any of the other provisions of this act, not otherwise specifically punished herein, or who shall buy, sell or fraudulently obtain any medical diploma, license or registration, or who shall aid or abet such buying, selling or fraudulently obtaining thereof, or who shall practice physic or surgery in this State under cover of a diploma or license that shall have been illegally obtained, or that shall have been signed or issued unlawfully, or under fraudulent representations, or mistake of fact in material regard, or who, after conviction of a felony, as aforesaid, shall attempt to practice physic or surgery in this State, and any person who shall assume the title of doctor of medicine, or append the letters "M. D." to his or her name, without having received the degree of doctor of medicine from some school, college or board empowered by law to confer such degree or title, shall be deemed guilty of a misdemeanor, and upon conviction thereof shall be punished by a fine of not less than $250, or imprisonment for six months, for the first offense; and upon conviction of a subsequent offense, by a fine of not less than $500, or imprisonment for not less than one year, or by both fine and imprisonment."

Persons practicing medicine or surgery without being lawfully authorized and registered are guilty of a misdemeanor, and are punishable by a fine of not less than $50 for the first offense, and for each subsequent offense by a fine of not less than $100, or by imprisonment for not less than one hundred days, or by both such fine and imprisonment. "When any prosecution under this act is made on the complaint of a lawfully incorporated medical society of this State, or a county society entitled to representation in a State society or association, the fine, when collected, shall be paid to the society making the complaint, and any excess of the amount of fiues so paid, over the expenses incurred by the said society in enforcing the medical law of this State, shall be paid at the end of the year to the county treasurer for the use of the poor of such county." "The duly incorporated medical society of any county in which any person shall practice physic or surgery without lawful authority or registration may, upon proof of such practice, recover from such practitioner, in an action before any justice of the peace, a penalty of $25 and the cost of the action for the first judgment, and upon every subsequent judgment for the same offense, a penalty of $50 and the cost of the action; provided that said societies shall pay to the county treasurer for the use of the poor of the county any surplus that may accrue in their hands from the excess of fines and penalties collected, over the disbursements of said society for counsel fees and the expenses incident to the enforcement of this act by them."

The statute does not apply to commissioned medical officers serving in the army or navy of the United States, or in the United States marine hospital service, while so commissioned, or any one while actually serving as a member of the resident medical staff of any legally incorporated hospital, or any legally qualified and registered dentist exclusively engaged in the practice of dentistry, or interfere with the manufacturers of artificial eyes, limbs or other pedical instruments, or trusses of any kind from fitting such instruments on persons 'in need thereof, or any lawfully

qualified physicians and surgeons residing in other States or countries meeting registered physicians and surgeons of this State in consultation, or any physician or surgeon residing on the border of a neighboring State, and duly authorized under the laws thereof to practice physic or surgery therein, whose practice extends into the limits of this State,, providing that such practitioner shall not open an office or appoint a place to meet patients or receive calls within the limits of the State of New York, or physicians duly registered in one county of this State called to attend isolated cases in another county, but not residing or habitually practicing therein.

The act repeals all inconsistent statutes, and especially all acts or parts of acts authorizing any incorporated medical school or college to confer the degree of doctor of medicine causa honoris or ad eundem or otherwise than upon duly graduated students in course; and it is further provided that the degree of doctor of medicine conferred causa honoris or ad eundem gradum shall not be a qualification for the practice of physic and surgery in this State. The statute also prescribes the forms to be used in the various steps required by the act in perfecting registration.

[merged small][ocr errors]

The testimony of physicians and surgeons may be divided into three classes:

First. The ordinary evidence of witnesses to transactions in which medical men are on the same footing as other persons.

Second. Testimony which may be given by medical men, depending peculiarly upon their professional skill, knowledge and experience, and which is called expert testimony.

Third. Testimony concerning matters which bave come to their knowledge in a strictly professional way, and which is privileged and not subject to disclosure, except under certain conditions.

The first classification needs no special elucidation. If a physician witnesses au occurrence in a casual way, not professionally, he is, of course. bound to testify, like any other person, and under the same rules. LITTLE VALLEY, N. Y. CHARLES Z. LINCOLN.

WIDOWS-NEW YORK LAWS OF 1889, CHAP-
TER 406.

Chapter 2, part 2, of the Revised Statutes, relating to the descent of real property, was amended by chapter 406 of the Laws of 1889, by adding a section to the chapter to be known as section 30, as follows:

"SEC. 30. If the intestate shall leave a widow, and a descendant or descendants, then such widow, in addition to any interest to which she may be entitled under the preceding sections of said chapter 2, shall be entitled to the use, during her life, of an additional portion of the estate, not exceeding in value $1,000; and in case the intestate shall leave a widow, and no descendant or descendants, then the widow shall be entitled to the absolute ownership in fee, of such additional portion of the estate."

This statute of 1887 is the latest general act upon this question. It codifies all the laws bearing upon the qualification of physicians, their licensing and registration, with heavy penalties for a violation of its provisions. It places the medical profession upon a firm basis, free from the encroachments of quackery, and it must inevitably have the effect to raise the standard of professional qualifications in the great and important field of medicine. The last Legislature, 1889, passed an act on this subject providing for the preliminary education of medical students. This provides that before the regents of the university of the State of New York or the trustees of any medical school or college within this State shall confer the degree of doctor of medicine on any person who has not received a baccalaureate degree in course from a college or university authorized to confer the same, they shall require him to file with the secretary or recording officer of their university or college, a certificate, showing that prior to entering upon the prescribed three years' study of medicine he passed an examination conducted under the authority and in accordance with the rules of the regents of the university of the State of New York, in arithmetic, grammar, geography, orthography, American history, English composition and the elements of natural philosophy. The act does not apply to persons who began the study of medicine before its passage. Thus after many years the medical profession has been placed substantially on the same plane as the legal profession, as to length of study and general qualifications, as well as to protection against quacks and pet-fined, for the provision does not give a specific proportifoggers.

I have now reviewed the statutes relating to the practice of medicine and surgery in this State. It will be noticed that the plan of regulation laid down in the first statute has been substantially followed since, and that the ideas of restrictiou and regulation and protection have developed with the growth of the modern idea of the division of labor and its classification, and the consequent necessity of more thorough technical preparation for professional life. The law which protects the intelligent and conscientious physician from❘ the unequal competition of the ignorant and unscrupulous empiric, is but simple justice to a class of men who have devoted their lives to the service of their fellows, and who are entitled to the legitimate rewards of such service.

The subject of evidence is one of the most important in which medical men have an interest outside of their strictly professional work. Physicians are frequently called as witnesses in judicial proceedings, and their testimony is often of the utmost importance to private

We note that the additional provisions are in the section said to be "in addition to any interest to which she may be entitled under the preceding sections of said chapter 2" There are no provisions in the chapter in favor of a widow, so the words quoted are merely surplusage, unless they shall be considered to relate to the provisions conferring dower which are found in chapter 1 of the same part of the Revised Statutes. The words quoted, however, require no construction, and the section would have the same force without them as with them, if the reference to the chapter was correct.

The additional portion so given to the widow is certainly in addition to her dower. But it applies only in cases of intestacy. In a case where it may be considered to apply, it is difficult to say how it is to be de

tion of the real estate, or a life use of a specific proportion as in the case of dower, but a portion not exceeding in value $1,000.

This would seem to give a portion not exceeding $1,000 in value; it would also seem to make her, the widow, a tenant in common with the heirs as to the portion so descending to her. In the absence of judicial construction it is impossible to say how the portion so given is to be ascertained, which will be treated of further in considering the other amendment made by the same chapter. As the statute is a beneficial one it must be liberally construed, and the court will, if possible, give it effect. One thing may probably be said of it: The provision applies if there is real estate of the intestate of sufficient value to be worth $1,000 in addition to the dower right of the widow, and if the value be less, that the provision for the widow would entirely take up the real estate. But the statute construed applies only in the case of intestacy.

By the same chapter (406) of the Laws of 1889, the Legislature amended section 2 of chapter 157 of Laws

of 1842, which provided for setting off to the widow, or infant children, $150 worth of household furniture, provisions, etc., in addition to the articles so set apart and exempt from appraisal by adding a provision:

"And in case the interest of a widow in the real estate of a deceased husband, in addition to her dower right, and together with said $150 shall be of less value than $1,000, then the said appraisers shall set apart, for the use of such widow, or for the use of such widow or child and children, in the manner hereinbefore prescribed, and personal property, which together with said $150 amount to $1,000 in value. Said appraisers are authorized to make an appraisal of the real estate to which the widow may be entitled for the purposes of this section. The provisions of this section apply where the man dies intestate as well as where he leaves a last will and testament. We again must remark that the amendment is not free from ambiguity which arises out of the phrase, "and together with said $150," which seems by the construction of the sentence to be considered a part of the $1,000, and to be so considered in ascertaining how much personal property shall be set apart. The $150 is to be considered together with the interest of a widow in the real estate of her husband, and if the same so aggregated shall be of less value than $1.000 the appraisers shall set apart certain property. While this however is the literal construction of the language the intent must be gathered from the consideration of the whole amendment. It will be remembered that according to the preceding terms of the section the appraisers are presumed to have already set apart certain property to the value of $150, and the intent of the amendment must have been to give them authority to set apart other personal property to the amount of $1,000, if there had not been a provision to the same amount conferred on the widow in the real estate of her deceased husband. Clearly such a provision could only have been made by will or deed. This must be the intent of the statute as gathered from it alone, but the ambiguity will not be overcome entirely except by judicial construction.

This brings us to the consideration of the duties of the appraisers in the premises.

then compelled to say in such a case (where there is no will but some more or less real estate) the statute fails to accomplish its evident intent.

But if by the will of decedent a devise or bequest is made to the widow for her life or absolutely in lieu of dower, as is done so frequently, how shall the statute be carried out? The appraisers in such a case must attempt to construe the will to ascertain what is given to the widow. If they find a devise to her they are by statute required to determine whether the value of it is as much as $1,000 in excess of what her dower right would be. To ascertain this they must determine the value of her dower right in the same way as before. They cannot do it in any way; they have no power to determine it judicially so as to conclude any of the parties interested.

If there is simply a bequest to her in lieu of dower the case will be the same as if the decedent was intestate and left no real estate, except that the appraisers must be certified in some manner whether the bequest is accepted in lieu of dower if; it is accepted the appraisers would set off the househould furniture, provisions, etc., to the value of $1,000.

In a case where there is an actual devise to a widow which might be construed to be in addition to her dower the same difficulty of ascertaining the value of the dower and consequently of the devise that was pointed out in the case first supposed of intestacy will be experienced. The appraisers could not act iu the premises.

The difficulties arising from the consideration of the two amendments, and in any case where the decedent left real estate, the appraisers not having power to conclusively ascertain the preliminary facts cannot set off the additional $1,000 or any portion of it out of the personal estate.

We have thus considered the effects of the amendment and believe that our conclusions are conservative indeed, but as liberal as they can be stated safely. Certainly the amendment last considered in the cases indicated must be treated as inoperative until there shall be an authoritative construction by the court. TROY, January 3, 1890.

M.

PARTNERSHIP-WHAT CONSTITUTES.

NEW YORK COURT OF APPEALS, OCT. 8, 1889.
HACKETT V. STANLEY.

** *

[ocr errors]

They shall then first inquire whether by will or by
deed, autenuptial or otherwise, or by the first amend-
ment considered, any provision is made for the widow
in or out of the real estate of the deceased husband in
addition to her dower. Now if there is no will nor
any provision by deed nor any real estate, the duty of
the appraisers will be clear. They will then set off to
the widow or infant children, in addition to the house-
hold furniture, provisions, etc., set off to the value of
$150, "more necessary household furniture, provisions
or other personal property, in the discretion of said
appraisers," which shall amount to $1,000 in value, if
there be so much personal property. If there be some
real estate the appraisers shall inquire into its value
and the value of the dower interest of the widow. The
appraisers are especially authorized to make an ap-
praisal of the real estate. By a necessary implication
they must also ascertain the value of the dower right
of the widow, for they cannot otherwise learn whether
there is real estate to the value of $1,000 in excess of
the dower. No way is prescribed for doing this last,
whether by computation according to the tables as
prescribed by the rules, or by the more primitive
method of guessing. They have no authority to ad-
minister oaths or take any proof as to the age of the
widow. They certainly cannot accept mere statements
as to her age. They are then powerless to determine
even quasi judicially the value of the widow's dower
interest, and if they cannot do this they cannot deter-peals from a judgment for plaintiff.
mine the value of the additional portion of the real
estate which has descended to the widow by the pro-
visions of the first section discussed (§ 30). We are

An agreement read as follows: For and in the considera-
tion of $750, * ** for use in the business of heating,
ventilating, etc., for which said party of the first part has
given unto said party of the second part his note at two
years,
and in further consideration of services
of said party of second part in securing sales in said busi-
ness, and for any further moneys he may, at his own op-
tion, advance for me in said business, the said party of
the first part agrees to divide equally the yearly net prof
its of said business. It is understood and agreed that
said loan of $750 is expressly for use in said business, and
for no other use whatever." It was further agreed that
advances by either party might be withdrawn, at the op-
tion of the party making them, and were to bear interest
while used in the business. The party of the first part
was to be allowed $1,000 per year for managing the busi-
ness, and quarterly statements of its condition were to be
made by him to the party of the second part. Held, that
the latter was, as to third persons, a partner with the
former, although such third persons gave credit wholly
to the other partner, and were ignorant of the partnership.

APPEAL from Common Pleas of New York city

and county, General Term.

Action for materials and labor. James Stanley ap

Jas. G. Janeway and Sidney Ward, for appellant.
Thos. C. Ennever, for respondents.

« iepriekšējāTurpināt »