LICENSEE PERFORMANCE REQUIREMENTS ATTACHMENT 5

9.3 STRUCTURED ENGLISH FOR PRIMARY ADDRESS FIELDS MATCHING

IF primary address fields match DIR primary address data
AND IF no secondary data

AND IF no multiple match is made

THEN 1. use DIR primary address fields

2. include, if requested by mailer, additional data
fields

3. pass to 'Match Last Line Number to City State
File' process

ELSE secondary address data was detected

SO 1. use DIR primary address fields

2. pass to 'Match Secondary Data' process

ELSE multiple match is made

So 1. tag with 'MULTIPLE MATCH IN PRIMARY ADDRESS'

2. file as a 'No-Match' address

ELSE primary address could not be matched

SO use matching logic that will overcome improper spelling and
or abbreviations

THEN match the Street, or PO Box, or Rural/Highway Contract
Route Fields

IF single match is made

AND IF no secondary data

THEN 1. use DIR primary address fields
2. include, if requested by mailer,
additional data DSF fields

3. tag with 'CORRECTED PRIMARY ADDRESS'
4. pass to 'Match Last Line Number
to City State File' process

ELSE secondary data was detected

SO 1. tag with 'CORRECTED PRIMARY ADDRESS'
2. pass to 'Match Secondary Data' process
ELSE primary address could not be matched
SO 1. tag with 'UNDELIVERABLE AS ADDRESSED'-
INCOMPLETE PRIMARY ADDRESS DATA
INCOMPLETE PO BOX INFORMATION

INCOMPLETE RURAL OR HIGHWAY CONTRACT
ROUTE INFORMATION

2. file as a 'No-Match' address

ELSE multiple match is made

SO 1. tag with 'MULTIPLE MATCH IN PRIMARY
ADDRESS'

2. file as a 'No-Match' address

NOTE: DIR DIRECTORY

LICENSEE PERFORMANCE REQUIREMENTS ATTACHMENT 6

9.4

STRUCTURED ENGLISH FOR SECONDARY ADDRESS DATA FIELDS MATCHING

IF secondary address data match DIR secondary address data
AND IF no multiple match is made

THEN 1. use DIR secondary address fields

2. include, if requested by mailer, additional data
fields

3. pass to 'Match Last Line Number to City State
File' process

ELSE multiple match is made

AND IF Firm/Bldg name match is made

THEN 1. use DIR secondary address fields

2. include, if requested by mailer, additional data fields

3. pass to 'Match Last Line Number to City State
File' process

ELSE 1. tag with 'MULTIPLE MATCH IN SECONDARY
ADDRESS DATA'

2. file as a 'No-Match' address

ELSE secondary address could not be matched

9.5

IF

SO use matching logic that will overcome improper spelling and or abbreviations

THEN match the Secondary address data fields

IF single match is made

THEN 1. use DIR secondary address data

2. include, if requested by mailer, additional data DIR fields

3. tag with 'CORRECTED SECONDARY ADDRESS DATA' 4. pass to 'Match Last Line Number to City State File' process

ELSE address could not be matched

SO 1. tag with 'UNDELIVERABLE AS ADDRESSED' -
INCOMPLETE SECONDARY ADDRESS DATA

2. file as a 'No-Match' address

ELSE multiple match is made

AND IF Firm/Bldg name match is made

THEN 1. use DIR secondary address fields 2. include, if requested by mailer, additional data fields

3. pass to 'Match Last Line Number to
City State File' process

SO 1. tag with 'MULTIPLE MATCH IN SECONDARY
ADDRESS DATA'

2. file as a 'No-Match' address

STRUCTURED ENGLISH FOR MATCHING LAST LINE NUMBER TO CITY/STATE

address record has a number in the last line number field
THEN match number to last line number field in City State file
SO replace address city name with matched City State
file city name

PAGE 1 OF 7 PAGES
LICENSEE SELECTION PROCESS

LICENSEE PERFORMANCE REQUIREMENTS

(EXHIBIT)

Each applicant must submit a technical proposal which describes the applicant's proposed approach to using DSP. The applicant must submit the technical proposal within the time specified in the soliciation letter. Each technical proposal will be evaluated and the applicant will be notified as to its acceptability. Applicants are advised to submit proposals which are fully and clearly acceptable without need for additional explanation or information. The Postal Service will make a final determination as to whether a proposal is acceptable or unacceptable solely on the basis of the proposal as submitted and will be permitted to proceed to the second step without requesting further information from any applicant.

The following evaluation factors will be used in the evaluation of the proposals:

EVALUATION FACTORS

STEP 1 - Technical Proposals

The technical review and analysis will be based upon both an evaluation of the capabilities indicated by each proponent to understand and satisfy the performance requirements and upon the ability of the applicant to demonstrate that it is currently operating a system(s) of similar scope, requiring similar technology, and has the management capability, marketing ability, and technical staff to accomplish the USPS requirement. The criteria set forth below will be used to rank each technical proposal.

Applicants must be prepared to perform a functional demonstration within two weeks after submission of their technical proposals. However, the Postal Service may determine the acceptability or non-acceptability of an individual technical proposal without requesting a functional demonstration.

The criteria itemized below will be used to rank each technical proposal: