Willis v. De Castro, 4 C. B. N. S. 216; 27 L. J. C. P. 243 v. Newham, 3 Y. & J. 518 v. Peckham, 1 Br. & B. 515; Moore, 300 v. Thorp, L. R. 10 Q. B. 383; 44 L. J. Q. B. 137 Willison v. Patteson, 7 Taunt. 439; 1 Moore, 133; 18 R. R. 525 Wills v. Bridge, 4 Exch. 193; 18 L. J. Ex. 384. v. Murray, 4 Exch. 843; 19 L. J. Ex. 209 Willson v. Love, [1896] 1 Q. B. 626; 65 L. J. Q. B. 474; 74 L. T. 580; 44 Wilmott v. Smith, Moo. & M. 238; 3 C. & P. 453; 31 R. R. 732 Wilson v. Barthrop, 2 M. & W. 863; M. & H. 81; 1 Jur. 949 v. Braddyll, 9 Exch. 718; 23 L. J. Ex. 227 v. Brett, 11 M. & W. 113; 12 L. J. Ex. 264; 63 R. R. 528 v. Coupland, 5 B. & Ald. 228. 570 634 B. 221 715 290 154 125 184, 214 99 200 154 650 v. Ford, L. R. 3 Ex. 63; 37 L. J. Ex. 60; 17 L. T. 605; 16 W. R. v. Furness Rail. Co., L. R. 9 Eq. 28; 39 L. J. Ch. 19; 21 L. T. 701 v. General Iron Screw Collier Co., 47 L. J. Q. B. 239; 39 L. T. 789 . v. Glossop, 20 Q. B. D. 354; 57 L. J. Q. B. 161; 58 L. T. 707 WILSON v. HART (1866), L. R. 1 Ch. 463; 35 L. J. Ch. 569; 12 Jur. N. S. 460 v. Hatton, 2 Ex. D. 336; 46 L. J. Ex. 489; 36 L. T. 473; 25 v. Hodson, L. R. 7 Ex. 84; 41 L. J. Ex. 49; 20 W. R. 438 v. Jones, L. R. 1 Ex. 193; 2 Ex. 139; 35 L. J. Ex. 95; 36 321 Wilson v. Lewis, 2 M. & G. 197 v. Lloyd, L. R. 16 Eq. 60; 42 L. J. Ch. 559; 28 L. T. 331; 21 . W. R. 507 v. Ray, 10 A. & E. 32; 2 P. & D. 253; 3 Jur. 384; 8 L. J. v. Smyth, 1 B. & Ad. 801 v. Strugnell, 7 Q. B. D. 548; 50 L. J. M. C. 145; 45 L. T. 218; v. Tucker, 3 Stark. 154; D. & R. N. P. C. 30; 25 R. R. 777 r. Tumman, 6 M. & G. 236; 6 Scott, N. R. 894; 12 L. J. C. P. PAGE 257 725 500 701 63 209 68 514 234 . v. West Hartlepool Rail. Co., 2 De G. J. & S. 475; 35 L. J. Ch. 241 v. Wilson (1838), & Scott, 540; 4 Bing. N. C. 748 v. Zulueta, 14 Q. B. 405; 19 L. J. Q. B. 49; 15 Jur. 366. 135, 242 Wilton v. Osborn, [1901] 2 K. B. 110 Wiltshire v. Sims, 1 Camp. 258; 10 R. R. 673 554 233 Iron Co. v. Great Western Rail. Co., L. R. 6 Q. B. 101, 776; 40 387 38 W. R. 738 565 Windle v. Jordan, 75 Maine, 149 381 Windsor, &c. Rail. Co. v. Reg., 11 App. Cas. 607; 55 L. J. P. C. 41 ; 55 L. T. Winkfield, The, [1902] P. 42; 71 L. J. P. 21; 85 L. T. 668; 50 W. R. 246; 9 Asp. M. C. 259, C. A. 367, 376 Winkworth v. Packington, 2 C. & P. 599 WINN . BULL (1877), 7 Ch. D. 29; 47 L. J. Ch. 139; 26 W. R. 230 Winter v. Trimmer, 1 W. Bl. 395 Wintle v. Crowther, 1 C. & J. 316; 1 Tyr. 210; 9 L. J. Ex. 65; 35 R. R. 728 Wise v. Charlton, 4 A. & E. 786; 6 N. & M. 364; 2 H. & W. 49; 43 R. R. 480 v. Great Western Rail. Co., 25 L. J. Ex. 258; 1 H. & N. 63 409 319 Wolff v. Oxholm, 6 M. & S. 92; 18 R. R. 313 C.C. v. Perpetual Trustee Co., [1903] A. C. 139; 72 L. J. P. C. 31; 87 L. T. 569; 51 W. R. 241, P. C. WITHERS v. REYNOLDS (1831), 2 B. & A. 882'; 1 L. J. (N. S.) K. B. 30 ; 36 R. R. 782 Wittersheim v. Carlyle (Lady), 1 H. Bl. 631 v. Summers, 2 Camp. 631; 12 R. R. 764 Wolseley v. Cox, 2 Q. B. 321; 11 L. J. Q. B. 9; 6 Jur. 599 Wolmershausen v. Gullick, [1893] 2 Ch. 514; 62 L. J. Ch. 773; 68 L T. 753; 3 R. 610 Wolverhampton Banking Co., Ex parte, Campbell, In re, 14 Q. B. D. 32 ; 33 W. R. 642; 1 M. B. R. 261 469 65, 68, 551 Wolveridge v. Steward, 1 C. & M. 645; 3 M. & Scott, 561; 3 Tyr. 637; 3 L. J. (N. S.) Ex. 330; 38 R. R 701. Wood v. Abrey, 3 Madd. 417; 18 R. R. 264 v. Benson, 2 C. & J. 94; 2 Tyr. 98; 1 Price, P. C. 169; 1 L. J. WOOD v. LEADBITTER (1845), 13 M. & W. 838; 14 L. J. Ex. 161. 104 h v. Downes, 18 Ves. 120; 11 R. R. 160 Wood v. Manley, 11 A. & E. 34; 3 P. & D. 5 ; 3 Jur. 1028 v. Priestner, L. R. 2 Exch. 282; 36 L. J. Ex. 127 v. Rowcliffe, 6 Exch. 407; 20 L. J. Ex. 285 v. Wood (1889), 14 P. D. 157 PAGE 105 448, 458 94 477 108 279 195 Woodbridge v. Spooner, 3 B. & Al. 233; 1 Chitt. 661; 22 R. R. 365 Woodger v. G. W. R. Co., L. R. 2 C. P. 318; 36 L. J. C. P. 177; 15 L. T. 579 Woodman v. Chapman, 1 Camp. 188; 10 R. R. 666 394, 422 201 Woods v. Lewis's Contract, In re, [1898] 2 Ch. 211; 67 L. J. Ch. 475; 78 Woodward v. L. & N. W. R. Co., 3 Ex. D. 121; 47 L. J. Ex. 263; L. T. 321 Wooley v. Batte (1826), 2 C. & P. 417 Woolf v. Hamilton, [1898] 2 Q. B. 337; 67 L. J. Q. B. 917; 79 L. T. 49 47 W. R. 70 Woolfe v. Horne, 2 Q. B. D. 355; 46 L. J. Q. B. 534; 36 L. T. 705 Wootton v. Steffenoni, 12 M. & W. 129; 13 L. J. Ex. 72. 546 v. Wood, 6 T. R. 710; 2 H. Bl. 574; 3 R. R. 323 Worthington v. Grimsditch, 7 Q. B. 749; 15 L. J. Q. B. 52; 10 Jur. 26 Wreck Recovery Co., In re, 15 Ch. D. 353; 43 L. T. 190; 29 W. R 266 Wren v. Hoit, [1903] 1 K. B. 610; 72 L. J. K. B. 340; 88 L. T. 282; 51 W. R. 435 345 WRIDE v. DYER, [1900] i Q. B. 23; 69 L. J. Q. B. 17; 81 L. T. 453; 48 W. R. 73 326 Wright v. Colls, 8 C. B. 150; 13 Jur. 1056; 19 L. J. C. P. 60. v. Horton, 12 App. Cas. 371; 56 L. J. Ch. 873; 56 L. T. 782; 36 585 v. Laing, 3 B. & C. 165; 4 D. & R. 783; 27 R. R. 313. 634 v. Leonard, 11 C. B. N. S. 258; 30 L. J. C. P. 365; 8 Jur. N. S. v. Mid. R. Co., L. R. 8 Ex. 137; 42 L. J. Ex. 89; 29 L. T. 436 Wycherley v. Wycherley, 2 Eden. 175 Wycombe R. Co. v. Donnington Hospital, L. R. 1 Ch. 268; 12 Jur. (N. S.) Wyld v. Pickford, 8 M. & W. 443; 10 L. J. Ex. 382; 58 R. R. 775 387, 389, 398, 406 Wylson v. Dunn, 34 Ch. D. 569; 56 L. J. Ch. 855; 56 L. T. 192; 35 81 Wynn v. Shropshire Union R. Co., 5 Ex. 420 611 X. XENOS . Danube, &c. R. Co., 13 C. B. N. S. 825 v. Wickham, L. R. 2 H. L. 296; 36 L. J. C. P. 313; 16 L. T. 800; 16 W. R. 38 PAGE 613 3 Y. YARBOROUGH v. The Bank of England, 16 East, 6; 14 R. R. 272 271 498 Yates v. Aston, 4 Q. B. 182; 3 G. & D. 351; 12 L. J. Q. B. 160; 62 R. R. 316 v. Evans (1892), 61 L. J. Ch. 441 v. Freckleton, 2 Doug. 625 v. Hoppe, 9 C. B. 541; 14 Jur. 372; 19 L. J. C. P. 180 v. Pim, 1 Holt, N. P. C. 95; 6 Taunt. 446; 16 R. R. 653 Yea v. Fouraker, 2 Burr. 1099 Yeo v. Dawe, 53 L. T. 125; 33 W. R. 739 York, &c. R. Co. v Crisp, 23 L. J. C. P. 125; 14 C. B. 527 Young, Ex parte, 17 Ch. D. 668; 50 L. J. Ch. 824; 45 L. T. 90 521 445 624 54 106 683 430 107 254 460 and Harston's Contract, In re, 31 Ch. D. 168; 53 L. T. 837; 34 301 v. Austen, L. R. 4 C. P. 553; 38 L. J. C. P. 233; 21 L. T. 327' 18 W. R. 63 YOUNG v. LEAMINGTON (1883), 8 App. Cas. 517; 57 L. J. Q. B. 292 Zunz v. S. E. R. Co., L. R. 4 Q. B. 539; 38 L. J. Q. B. 209; 20 L. T. 873; 10 B. & S. 594; 17 W. R. 1096 150, 157 410, 423 ADDENDA. At p. 16, to note (q) add, "It may be contemplated that post and telegraph would be the means of communication between two Americans residing temporarily in London and taken frequently to the Continent, and apart from one another: Bruner v. Moore, [1904] 1 Ch. 305." At p. 61 (r) add reference to Continental Caoutchouc and Gutta Percha Co. v. Kleinwort (1904), 90 L. T. 474, C. A., affirming Bigham, J. At p. 114 (0) add reference to Vezey v. Rashleigh (1904), 90 L. T. 663. At p. 217 (0) add reference to Hope Johnstone, In re, Hope Johnstone v. Hope Johnstone, [1904] 1 Ch. 470. At p. 263 (f) add references to Broome v. Speak, [1903] 1 Ch. 586, C. A., and Shepheard v. Broome, [1904] A. C. 342, affirming that case. After last line of p. 305 insert, "A purchaser cannot sue for a non-continuing wrong done before date of purchase: Dawson v. G. N. R. and City Railway, [1904] 1 K. B. 277; 73 L. J. K. B. 174; 90 L. T. 20." At p. 328 (o) insert reference to 52 W. R. 615. At p. 335, at end of Ch. XIII., add "From Taddy v. Sterious, [1904] 1 Ch. 354, and McGruther v. Pitcher, C. A. (see Solicitors' Journal for August 20th, 1904, at p. 695), it appears that a contract for sale of goods cannot restrict their re-sale so as to bind a sub-purchaser." At p. 444, to note (y), add, "Where the customer of a bank delivers to the banker for collection a crossed cheque to which he has no title, the fact that the banker credits the customer in the bank ledger with the amount of the cheque before it is cleared does not deprive the banker of the protection afforded by this section: Akrokerri (Atlantic) Mines, Limited v. Economic Bank, [1904] 2 K. B. 465, C. A.” At p. 494, to note (z), after later cases add, "Affirmed by C. A., [1904] 2 K. B. 410; 90 L. T. 656." At p. 500 insert, "For summary of and extracts from Report of Departmental Committee as to history, scope and working of Workmen's Compensation Acts, 1897 and 1900, see Law Times for Aug. 20th and 27th, 1904; and see Law Journal Newspaper for Aug. 13th, 1904, at p. 420." At p. 519, to note (t) add reference to view of Lawrance, J., in Robinson v. Earl Cadogan (Times, Aug. 9th, 1904), that "whatever the legal rights of the parties, it is the moral duty of a skilled person employed on the business of another, if it turns out that more expense would be employed than was in the contemplation of the employer, to point that out to him." At p. 610, note (h), add reference to Woodfall's Landlord and Tenant, 17th ed., Appendix G. |