| United States. Congress. House. Committee on Agriculture - 1960 - 1036 lapas
...locality". Ill Any consideration of the question must also take into account the well-established rule that the construction of a statute by those charged with its execution, esjK»cially when it has long prevailed and has l>een acquiesced in by Congress, is entitled to great... | |
| United States. Department of Justice - 1963 - 664 lapas
...locality." Ill Any consideration of the question must also take into account the well established rule that the construction of a statute by those charged with its execution, especially when it has long prevailed and has been acquiesced in by Congress, is entitled to great... | |
| United States. Congress. Senate. Judiciary - 1969 - 1098 lapas
...statutory construction.* And here this principle is given special force by the equally venerable principle that the construction of a statute by those charged...unless there are compelling indications that it is wrong,8 especially when Congress has • Federal Housing Administration v. Darlington, Inc., 358 US... | |
| United States. Tax Court - 1992 - 764 lapas
...entitled to substantial judicial deference and "We note that sec. 1253(bX2) is a nonexclusive list. should be followed unless there are compelling indications that it is wrong. CBS, Inc. v. FCC, 453 US 367, 382, 390 (1981); FCC v. WNCN Listeners Guild, 450 US 582, 594, 596, 598... | |
| United States. Congress. House. Government Operations Committee - 1973 - 434 lapas
...statutory construction. And here this principle is given special force by the equally venerable principle that the construction of a statute by those charged...there are compelling indications that it is wrong...* [Emphasis •upplied.J .» Vy In National Automatic Laundry and Cleaning Council v. Shultz, 443 F.... | |
| United States. Congress. House. Committee on Science and Astronautics - 1974 - 324 lapas
...statutory construction. And here this principle is given special force by the equally venerable principle that the construction of a statute by those charged...there are compelling indications that it is wrong . . ." [Emphasis supplied.] In National Automatic Laundry and Cleaning Council v. Shttllz, 443 F. 2d... | |
| |