Lapas attēli
PDF
ePub

fine.

Commissioner EGGER. Mr. Chairman, I have a complete written statement, and I would like to sub record.

The CHAIRMAN. Without objection.

[The prepared statement follows:]

IALLY DISCRIMINATORY PRIVATE SCHOOLS AND

CHARITABLE CONTRIBUTIONS TO THEM.

W. GIDEON, IRS CHIEF COUNSEL.

ACCOMPANYING

OLVEMENT IN THIS AREA BEGAN AFTER THE SUPREME COURT ■ V. BOARD OF EDUCATION AND BOLLING V. SHARPE1

SCRIMINATION IN PUBLIC EDUCATION TO BE

[blocks in formation]

OF EDUCATION, 347 U.S. 483 (1954); BOLLING V.
S. 497 (1954)

D OF SUPERVISORS OF PRINCE EDWARD COUNTY, 4TH CIR. 1964); POINTDEXTER V. LOUISIANA FINANCE SSION, 273 F. SUPP. 833 (ED LA 1967), AFFD. PER 571 (1968); COFFEY AND UNITED STATES V. FINANCE ASSISTANCE COMMISSION, 296 F. ISS 1969)

[graphic]

we procee

WHOSE OPERATION WITH STATE AND LOCAL GOVERNMENT AID WAS UNCONSTITUTIONAL OR IN VIOLATION OF THE LAWS OF THE UNIT HOWEVER, RACIALLY DISCRIMINATORY SCHOOLS THAT OPERATED W STATE SUPPORT OR AID WOULD CONTINUE TO BE EXEMPT FROM FE INCOME TAX.

IN 1969, THE SERVICE WAS SUED BY THE PARENTS OF BLA IN THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI. THEIR ARGUMENT WAS THAT TH OF TAX EXEMPTION AND DEDUCTIBLE CONTRIBUTIONS TO A PRIVA DISCRIMINATORY SCHOOL AMOUNTED TO UNCONSTITUTIONAL GOVER

ACTION.

THEY ASSERTED THAT THESE SCHOOLS FAILED TO QUAL

EXEMPTION BECAUSE THEIR PRACTICES VIOLATED CLEAR FEDERAL

3

IRS NEWS RELEASE DATED AUGUST 2, 1967

LOWING TAX EXEMPTIONS TO PRIVATE SCHOOLS THAT

ATE NOR TREAT CONTRIBUTIONS TO SUCH SCHOOLS AS TO QUALIFY FOR SUCH BENEFITS, ALL PRIVATE

RED TO ADOPT AND PUBLICLY ANNOUNCE A POLICY

RIMINATION.

THE THEN COMMISSIONER OF THE

SERVICE INDICATED THAT THE LEGAL ASPECTS OF THIS

CUSSED AND STUDIED IN GREAT DEPTH WITHIN BOTH

TMENT AND THE DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE AND THAT BOTH 7

N ACCORD WITH THE POSITION. THE WHITE HOUSE

S RELEASE ENDORSING THIS POSITION.

Y, 309 F. SUPP. 1127 (D.D.C. 1970) [PRELIMINARY
PEAL DISMISSED SUB NOM. CANNON V. GREEN, 398 U.S.
PEAL FROM SUBSEQUENT ORDERS DISMISSED SUB NOM.
400 U.S. 986 (1971).

, 26 AFTR 2D 70-5416 (n.n.C.) [REVISED UNCTION]; GREEN V. CONNALLY, 330 F. Supp. 1150 NENT INJUNCTION, AFF D SUB NOM. COIT V. GREEN, 971).

ES JULY 10 AND 19, 1970

I THE SELECT COMMITTEE FOR FOUAL EDUCATIONAL
UGUST 12, 1970

CONCLUDING THAT RACIALLY DISCRIMINATORY PRIVATE SCHOOLS WERE

NOT ELIGIBLE FOR TAX BENEFITS AVAILABLE TO CHARITIES, THE THREE-JUDGE COURT IN GREEN ENTERED THE PERMANENT INJUNCTION IN JUNE OF 1971. A CHALLENGE ON THE MERITS OF THE ORDER WAS MADE BY PARENTS SUPPORTING SCHOOLS WITH EXCLUSIVELY WHITE ENROLLMENTS. ON AN APPEAL BY THE WHITE PARENTS, THE UNITED STATES SUPREME COURT AFFIRMED PER

CURIAM THE LOWER COURT.&

IN 1970, THE SERVICE EXAMINED PRIVATE SCHOOLS IN MISSISSIPPI AND, APPLYING SIMILAR PROCEDURES SURVEYED 15,000 SCHOOLS NATIONWIDE. THESE ACTIONS RESULTED IN REVOCATION OF THE TAX EXEMPT STATUS OF OVER 100 SCHOOLS THAT WOULD NOT ADOPT AND PUBLICIZE A RACIALLY NONDISCRIMINATORY ADMISSIONS POLICY. INCLUDED AMONG THE SCHOOLS THAT REFUSED TO ADOPT SUCH A POLICY WAS ROB JONES UNIVERSITY. IT SHOULD BE NOTED THAT THE SERVICE GAVE EVERY PRIVATE SCHOOL WITH A RACIALLY DISCRIMINATORY POLICY AN OPPORTUNITY TO CHANGE THAT

POLICY BEFORE IT TOOK ACTION.

IN

SINCE 1970, THE SERVICE HAS TAKEN A NUMBER OF ADDITIONAL STEPS TO IMPLEMENT THE RACIAL NONDISCRIMINATION REQUIREMENT. 1971, IRS PUBLISHED A RULING EXPLAINING THE NONDISCRIMINATORY Q REQUIREMENT, AND, IN 1972, THE SERVICE PUBLISHED A PROCEDURE THAT ESTABLISHED GUIDELINES FOR PUBLICIZING A SCHOOL'S RACIALLY NON10

DISCRIMINATORY POLICY.

8

COIT V. GREEN, 404 1.S. 997 (1971). THE SUPREME COURT IN

ROB JONES UNIVERSITY V. SIMON, 416 U.S. 725, 740, FN. 11, STATED

THAT THE GREEN AFFIRMANCE LACKS THE PRECEDENTIAL WEIGHT OF A
CASE INVOLVING A TRULY ADVERSARY CONTROVERSY.

REV. PUL. 71-447, 1971-2 C.B. 230

10

REV.

PROC. 72-54, 1972-C.R. 834

« iepriekšējāTurpināt »