Cases Decided in United States Court of Customs and Patent Appeals: Customs Cases Adjudged in the Court of Customs and Patent Appeals, 55. sējums
The Court, 1967
Lietotāju komentāri - Rakstīt atsauksmi
Ierastajās vietās neesam atraduši nevienu atsauksmi.
Citi izdevumi - Skatīt visu
acid added affidavit affirmed agree appellant's appellants appellee application argues argument basis brief CCPA Chief Judge claims combination composition compounds comprising conclusion confusion considered consisting containing counsel counts court Customs decision defined described designation determine directed disclaimer discloses disclosure District double patenting effect electric elements entitled establish evidence examiner examiner's example fact filed further ground interference invention involved issue Judge least limitations mark material means metal method noted obvious operation opinion Oral ordinary parties Patent Office portion position practice prepared present prior art problem question reason recited record reduction reference registration rejection relates relied resin respect result reversed Rich Rule separate Serial shown skill SMITH specification statement structure subject matter substantially sufficient suggest surface teachings term terminal tion trademark United USPQ
727. lappuse - Under §103, the scope and content of the prior art are to be determined; differences between the prior art and the claims at issue are to be ascertained; and the level of ordinary skill in the pertinent art resolved.
777. lappuse - The specification shall contain a written description of the invention, and of the manner and process of making and using it, in such full, clear, concise, and exact terms as to enable any person skilled in the art to which it pertains, or with which it is most nearly connected, to make and use the same, and shall set forth the best mode contemplated by the inventor of carrying out his invention.
1394. lappuse - ... described in a printed publication in this or a foreign country, before the invention thereof by the applicant for patent, or b. the invention was patented or described in a printed publication in this or a foreign country or in public use or on sale in this country, more than one year prior to the date of the application for patent in the United States, or c.
1057. lappuse - A patent may not be obtained though the invention is not identically disclosed or described as set forth in section 102 of this title, if the differences between the subject matter sought to be patented and the prior art are such that the subject matter as a whole would have been obvious at the time the invention was made to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which said subject matter pertains.
700. lappuse - The Lord bless you and keep you; the Lord make his face to shine upon you and be gracious to you; the Lord lift up his countenance upon you and give you peace.
835. lappuse - The patent statutes provide for a specification separate from the patent claims, and require that the claims particularly point out and distinctly claim the subject matter which the applicant regards as his invention.
842. lappuse - Office or a mark or trade name previously used in the United States by another and not abandoned, as to be likely, when applied to the goods of the applicant, to cause confusion, or to cause mistake, or to deceive...
1050. lappuse - No trade-mark by which the goods of the applicant may be distinguished from the goods of others shall be refused registration on the principal register on account of its nature...
1023. lappuse - ... of the first application and if it contains or is amended to contain a specific reference to the earlier filed application.