No grāmatas satura
1.3. rezultāts no 35.
57. lappuse
The grounds presented must not be based upon allegations contained in ex parte affidavits or testimony taken in the interference or require an independent investigation . Such motions are heard and decided by the Examiner of ...
The grounds presented must not be based upon allegations contained in ex parte affidavits or testimony taken in the interference or require an independent investigation . Such motions are heard and decided by the Examiner of ...
64. lappuse
TRIAL OF AN INTERFERENCE PROCEEDING Testimony ; Time ; Burden of Proof The taking of testimony in interference proceedings is governed by 35 U.S.C. 23 , 24 which take the place of Secs . 4905-4908 , incl . , R.S. , and by Rules 251-259 ...
TRIAL OF AN INTERFERENCE PROCEEDING Testimony ; Time ; Burden of Proof The taking of testimony in interference proceedings is governed by 35 U.S.C. 23 , 24 which take the place of Secs . 4905-4908 , incl . , R.S. , and by Rules 251-259 ...
67. lappuse
An applicant cannot establish the requisite facts by his testimony alone . And his notes of themselves do not suffice.2 Credible oral testimony of other persons will do . But it must be factually specific.3 The evidence should ...
An applicant cannot establish the requisite facts by his testimony alone . And his notes of themselves do not suffice.2 Credible oral testimony of other persons will do . But it must be factually specific.3 The evidence should ...
Lietotāju komentāri - Rakstīt atsauksmi
Ierastajās vietās neesam atraduši nevienu atsauksmi.
Saturs
Introduction | 1 |
Restrictions re Common Ownership Title | 11 |
Attorneys May Not Represent Parties with | 19 |
Autortiesības | |
6 citas sadaļas nav parādītas.
Citi izdevumi - Skatīt visu
Bieži izmantoti vārdi un frāzes
50 CCPA abandonment action adversary amend appeal application approval assignee Attorneys award Board burden of proof CADC CCPA claims Com'r Pats Company considered copy Corp Corporation Court of Customs Customs and Patent decision determination direct disclosed disclosure effect entitled establish et al evidence extended fact failure ference filing filing date final hearing function ground held infra inter interference interpreted inventor involving judgment junior party jurisdiction limitations Manual means motion notice old Rule operation original panels Patent Appeals Patent Office pending period petition preliminary statement present Primary Examiner prior priority of invention Procedure proceedings proposed Count Public question reasons record reduction to practice reference refusal relation Request res adjudicata respect senior specification structure subject matter Supp supra taken taking Term testimony tion United USPQ