No grāmatas satura
1.3. rezultāts no 14.
108. lappuse
... or any of them ; and in support of said motion shows : ** As to Counts 1 and 2 While the specification and drawings of the Junior Party's application respectively disclose and show clamp members extending through support bars of the ...
... or any of them ; and in support of said motion shows : ** As to Counts 1 and 2 While the specification and drawings of the Junior Party's application respectively disclose and show clamp members extending through support bars of the ...
109. lappuse
Unlike the specification of the Senior Party which expressly describes such operation and function ( p . 2 , 7th line from bottom ; p . 5 , 14th line from bottom ; p . 6 , line 16 ) , the specification of the Junior Party is silent on ...
Unlike the specification of the Senior Party which expressly describes such operation and function ( p . 2 , 7th line from bottom ; p . 5 , 14th line from bottom ; p . 6 , line 16 ) , the specification of the Junior Party is silent on ...
114. lappuse
Claim 2 , as amended and Proposed Count A ( ......... modified ) reads : ( Here set forth proposed count ) While the specification and drawing of the Junior Party's application respectively disclose a support bar , telescoping panels ...
Claim 2 , as amended and Proposed Count A ( ......... modified ) reads : ( Here set forth proposed count ) While the specification and drawing of the Junior Party's application respectively disclose a support bar , telescoping panels ...
Lietotāju komentāri - Rakstīt atsauksmi
Ierastajās vietās neesam atraduši nevienu atsauksmi.
Saturs
Introduction | 1 |
Restrictions re Common Ownership Title | 11 |
Attorneys May Not Represent Parties with | 19 |
Autortiesības | |
6 citas sadaļas nav parādītas.
Citi izdevumi - Skatīt visu
Bieži izmantoti vārdi un frāzes
50 CCPA abandonment action adversary amend appeal application approval assignee Attorneys award Board burden of proof CADC CCPA claims Com'r Pats Company considered copy Corp Corporation Court of Customs Customs and Patent decision determination direct disclosed disclosure effect entitled establish et al evidence extended fact failure ference filing filing date final hearing function ground held infra inter interference interpreted inventor involving judgment junior party jurisdiction limitations Manual means motion notice old Rule operation original panels Patent Appeals Patent Office pending period petition preliminary statement present Primary Examiner prior priority of invention Procedure proceedings proposed Count Public question reasons record reduction to practice reference refusal relation Request res adjudicata respect senior specification structure subject matter Supp supra taken taking Term testimony tion United USPQ