No grāmatas satura
1.3. rezultāts no 25.
23. lappuse
2 If , during the pendency of the interference , a reference be found which in the opinion of the Primary Examiner renders all or part of the interfering subject matter unpatentable , he must , under Rule 237 ( a ) , call it to the ...
2 If , during the pendency of the interference , a reference be found which in the opinion of the Primary Examiner renders all or part of the interfering subject matter unpatentable , he must , under Rule 237 ( a ) , call it to the ...
48. lappuse
Second , if the Primary Examiner finds a reference or other reason for terminating the interference in whole or in part while the interference is before him for determination of a motion , decision on this newly discovered matter ...
Second , if the Primary Examiner finds a reference or other reason for terminating the interference in whole or in part while the interference is before him for determination of a motion , decision on this newly discovered matter ...
53. lappuse
These affidavits should not be opened to the inspection of opposing parties and no reference should be made to the dates of invention set forth therein other than the inere statement that the effective date of the reference has been ...
These affidavits should not be opened to the inspection of opposing parties and no reference should be made to the dates of invention set forth therein other than the inere statement that the effective date of the reference has been ...
Lietotāju komentāri - Rakstīt atsauksmi
Ierastajās vietās neesam atraduši nevienu atsauksmi.
Saturs
Introduction | 1 |
Restrictions re Common Ownership Title | 11 |
Attorneys May Not Represent Parties with | 19 |
Autortiesības | |
6 citas sadaļas nav parādītas.
Citi izdevumi - Skatīt visu
Bieži izmantoti vārdi un frāzes
50 CCPA abandonment action adversary amend appeal application approval assignee Attorneys award Board burden of proof CADC CCPA claims Com'r Pats Company considered copy Corp Corporation Court of Customs Customs and Patent decision determination direct disclosed disclosure effect entitled establish et al evidence extended fact failure ference filing filing date final hearing function ground held infra inter interference interpreted inventor involving judgment junior party jurisdiction limitations Manual means motion notice old Rule operation original panels Patent Appeals Patent Office pending period petition preliminary statement present Primary Examiner prior priority of invention Procedure proceedings proposed Count Public question reasons record reduction to practice reference refusal relation Request res adjudicata respect senior specification structure subject matter Supp supra taken taking Term testimony tion United USPQ