Outline of Patent Office Interference Practice1964 |
No grāmatas satura
1.–3. rezultāts no 11.
114. lappuse
... Proposed Count A ( modified ) reads : Claim 2 , as amended and ( Here set forth proposed count ) While the specification and drawing of the Junior Party's application respectively disclose a support bar , telescoping panels and means ...
... Proposed Count A ( modified ) reads : Claim 2 , as amended and ( Here set forth proposed count ) While the specification and drawing of the Junior Party's application respectively disclose a support bar , telescoping panels and means ...
115. lappuse
... Proposed Count B reads : Claim 9 , as amended ) ( Here set forth proposed count ) This claim more specifically defines the clamping means and omits the " whereby " or functional clause of proposed Count A. It includes , however , the ...
... Proposed Count B reads : Claim 9 , as amended ) ( Here set forth proposed count ) This claim more specifically defines the clamping means and omits the " whereby " or functional clause of proposed Count A. It includes , however , the ...
117. lappuse
... count . As to Proposed Count E Proposed Count E , which is copied from Claim 9 of the Junior Party's application is objectionable for the same reasons and upon the same grounds as proposed Count D. Additionally , it is misdescriptive ...
... count . As to Proposed Count E Proposed Count E , which is copied from Claim 9 of the Junior Party's application is objectionable for the same reasons and upon the same grounds as proposed Count D. Additionally , it is misdescriptive ...
Saturs
Introduction | 1 |
Restrictions re Common Ownership Title | 11 |
Attorneys May Not Represent Parties with | 19 |
Autortiesības | |
12 citas sadaļas nav parādītas.
Citi izdevumi - Skatīt visu
Bieži izmantoti vārdi un frāzes
36 CCPA 49 CCPA 50 CCPA 75 USPQ 99 USPQ adversary affidavits amend application or patent Attorneys award of priority Board erred Board of Interference Botnen burden of proof CADC Com'r Pats Commissioner of Patents Commonwealth Engineering Corp Court of Customs Customs and Patent decision declaration of interference determination disclosed disclosure double patenting effect estoppel evidence Examiner of Interferences ference filing date infra inter interference counts Interference Examiners interference issue interference proceeding inventor inventorship involving judgment junior party jurisdiction L.Ed Manual motion period motion to dissolve motion under Rule notice old Rule panels Patent Appeals Patent Interferences Patent Office patentable subject matter pending petition Primary Examiner prior art priority of invention proposed Count Radio Corporation reasons of appeal record reduction to practice res judicata Rule 94 senior show cause specification Sperry Rand subject matter Supp supra tion Watson