No grāmatas satura
1.3. rezultāts no 37.
22. lappuse
The primary examiner will retain jurisdiction of the case until the declaration of interference is made See Rule 237 ( b ) . ' ! 2 When an interference is declared ex parte prosecution of an application involved in the interference is ...
The primary examiner will retain jurisdiction of the case until the declaration of interference is made See Rule 237 ( b ) . ' ! 2 When an interference is declared ex parte prosecution of an application involved in the interference is ...
23. lappuse
( 2 ) a petition to institute public use proceedings under Rule 292 in which case the Primary Examiner may act as judge ; 1 ( 3 ) a request of the Primary Examiner when he is of the opinion that an action should be made independently of ...
( 2 ) a petition to institute public use proceedings under Rule 292 in which case the Primary Examiner may act as judge ; 1 ( 3 ) a request of the Primary Examiner when he is of the opinion that an action should be made independently of ...
48. lappuse
This is accomplished by a letter from the Primary Examiner to the Examiner of Interferences re questing that the interference be withdrawn * * * * The Primary Èxaminer then acts upon the applications as though no interference had been ...
This is accomplished by a letter from the Primary Examiner to the Examiner of Interferences re questing that the interference be withdrawn * * * * The Primary Èxaminer then acts upon the applications as though no interference had been ...
Lietotāju komentāri - Rakstīt atsauksmi
Ierastajās vietās neesam atraduši nevienu atsauksmi.
Saturs
Introduction | 1 |
Restrictions re Common Ownership Title | 11 |
Attorneys May Not Represent Parties with | 19 |
Autortiesības | |
6 citas sadaļas nav parādītas.
Citi izdevumi - Skatīt visu
Bieži izmantoti vārdi un frāzes
50 CCPA abandonment action adversary amend appeal application approval assignee Attorneys award Board burden of proof CADC CCPA claims Com'r Pats Company considered copy Corp Corporation Court of Customs Customs and Patent decision determination direct disclosed disclosure effect entitled establish et al evidence extended fact failure ference filing filing date final hearing function ground held infra inter interference interpreted inventor involving judgment junior party jurisdiction limitations Manual means motion notice old Rule operation original panels Patent Appeals Patent Office pending period petition preliminary statement present Primary Examiner prior priority of invention Procedure proceedings proposed Count Public question reasons record reduction to practice reference refusal relation Request res adjudicata respect senior specification structure subject matter Supp supra taken taking Term testimony tion United USPQ