The United States Patents Quarterly, 64. sējumsAssociated Industry Publications, 1945 |
No grāmatas satura
1.–3. rezultāts no 84.
127. lappuse
... position that in view of what has been stated above , appel- lant's application lacks adequate dis- closure to support the claims and relies upon the case of In re Wahlforss et al . , 1941 C.D.251 , 117 F.2d 270 [ 48 USPQ 397 ] , as ...
... position that in view of what has been stated above , appel- lant's application lacks adequate dis- closure to support the claims and relies upon the case of In re Wahlforss et al . , 1941 C.D.251 , 117 F.2d 270 [ 48 USPQ 397 ] , as ...
199. lappuse
... positions , in one end position of which it causes delivery of actuating fluid to the main cylinder and opens the pull - back cylinder for escape of actuating fluid , and in another end position of which it connects the actuating fluid ...
... positions , in one end position of which it causes delivery of actuating fluid to the main cylinder and opens the pull - back cylinder for escape of actuating fluid , and in another end position of which it connects the actuating fluid ...
210. lappuse
... position of Fig . 4 to the position of Fig . 2. Defendant asserts that Frank and Messing did not have the movable contact and operating arm directly connected as called for by the claims and that arm 24 " is not directly connected to ...
... position of Fig . 4 to the position of Fig . 2. Defendant asserts that Frank and Messing did not have the movable contact and operating arm directly connected as called for by the claims and that arm 24 " is not directly connected to ...
Saturs
ternational Braid Co CCA | 1 |
92 | 7 |
Richfield Oil Corp Black v | 12 |
Autortiesības | |
60 citas sadaļas nav parādītas.
Citi izdevumi - Skatīt visu
Bieži izmantoti vārdi un frāzes
acid action affirmed alleged allowed amount Appeals application associated Board called cause Circuit claims combination Company complaint connection considered containing contract Corporation cover Decided decision decree defendant defendant's denied described determine device directed disclosed disclosure dismissed District Court effect Electric elements evidence examiner fact fibers filed follows further glass granted ground held holding individual infringement interference invalid invention involved issue Judge judgment license limited lines machine manufacture material matter means ment metal method motion motor operation opinion original Particular parties Patent Office plaintiff portion position practice present pressure prior prior art question reason record reference refused registration rejected relates respect result royalties Rule similar specification substantially sufficient suit surface tion trade mark United USPQ validity York