The United States Patents Quarterly, 64. sējumsAssociated Industry Publications, 1945 |
No grāmatas satura
1.–3. rezultāts no 80.
11. lappuse
... ment of a royalty . The controversy arose because of the omission from the agree- ment of Black's patent application No. 599,403 , filed November 6 , 1922. This ap- plication culminated in the issuance on March 30 , 1937 of patent No ...
... ment of a royalty . The controversy arose because of the omission from the agree- ment of Black's patent application No. 599,403 , filed November 6 , 1922. This ap- plication culminated in the issuance on March 30 , 1937 of patent No ...
276. lappuse
... ment reversed . 2047455 , Anderson , Brake Bottom Rod Support , judgment reversed . Appeal from District Court for North- ern District of Illinois , Holly , D. J. Action by Grip Nut Company against John H. Sharp and Minnie E. Sharp for ...
... ment reversed . 2047455 , Anderson , Brake Bottom Rod Support , judgment reversed . Appeal from District Court for North- ern District of Illinois , Holly , D. J. Action by Grip Nut Company against John H. Sharp and Minnie E. Sharp for ...
506. lappuse
... ment in which Westinghouse Electric & Manufacturing Company counterclaimed for declaratory judgment of patent in- validity and non - infringement . On mo- tions by plaintiff and Westinghouse Electric & Manufacturing Company to set aside ...
... ment in which Westinghouse Electric & Manufacturing Company counterclaimed for declaratory judgment of patent in- validity and non - infringement . On mo- tions by plaintiff and Westinghouse Electric & Manufacturing Company to set aside ...
Saturs
ternational Braid Co CCA | 1 |
92 | 7 |
Richfield Oil Corp Black v | 12 |
Autortiesības | |
60 citas sadaļas nav parādītas.
Citi izdevumi - Skatīt visu
Bieži izmantoti vārdi un frāzes
acid action affirmed alleged allowed amount Appeals application associated Board called cause Circuit claims combination Company complaint connection considered containing contract Corporation cover Decided decision decree defendant defendant's denied described determine device directed disclosed disclosure dismissed District Court effect Electric elements evidence examiner fact fibers filed follows further glass granted ground held holding individual infringement interference invalid invention involved issue Judge judgment license limited lines machine manufacture material matter means ment metal method motion motor operation opinion original Particular parties Patent Office plaintiff portion position practice present pressure prior prior art question reason record reference refused registration rejected relates respect result royalties Rule similar specification substantially sufficient suit surface tion trade mark United USPQ validity York