The United States Patents Quarterly, 64. sējumsAssociated Industry Publications, 1945 |
No grāmatas satura
1.–3. rezultāts no 89.
217. lappuse
... follows : " Confirming our telephone conversa- tion of this morning , I am returning three ties to you , as follows : 1. The red tie made of the patented construction , which was submitted to you by Mr. W. A. Taylor , the lining being ...
... follows : " Confirming our telephone conversa- tion of this morning , I am returning three ties to you , as follows : 1. The red tie made of the patented construction , which was submitted to you by Mr. W. A. Taylor , the lining being ...
385. lappuse
... follows . The rook in the design patent in suit , is also identical to the rook in defendant's exhibit A imported by L. Oppleman , Inc. , and follows the design of the rook in de- fendant's exhibit BB sold by E. S. Lowe Co. , Inc. 15 ...
... follows . The rook in the design patent in suit , is also identical to the rook in defendant's exhibit A imported by L. Oppleman , Inc. , and follows the design of the rook in de- fendant's exhibit BB sold by E. S. Lowe Co. , Inc. 15 ...
485. lappuse
... follows : " There is another modification of this process that is also important , namely , in pumping the pulp ... follow this teaching . [ 24 ] The charge of infringement is sustainable only on a broad construction of the claims in ...
... follows : " There is another modification of this process that is also important , namely , in pumping the pulp ... follow this teaching . [ 24 ] The charge of infringement is sustainable only on a broad construction of the claims in ...
Saturs
ternational Braid Co CCA | 1 |
92 | 7 |
Richfield Oil Corp Black v | 12 |
Autortiesības | |
60 citas sadaļas nav parādītas.
Citi izdevumi - Skatīt visu
Bieži izmantoti vārdi un frāzes
acid action affirmed alleged allowed amount Appeals application associated Board called cause Circuit claims combination Company complaint connection considered containing contract Corporation cover Decided decision decree defendant defendant's denied described determine device directed disclosed disclosure dismissed District Court effect Electric elements evidence examiner fact fibers filed follows further glass granted ground held holding individual infringement interference invalid invention involved issue Judge judgment license limited lines machine manufacture material matter means ment metal method motion motor operation opinion original Particular parties Patent Office plaintiff portion position practice present pressure prior prior art question reason record reference refused registration rejected relates respect result royalties Rule similar specification substantially sufficient suit surface tion trade mark United USPQ validity York