The United States Patents Quarterly, 64. sējumsAssociated Industry Publications, 1945 |
No grāmatas satura
1.–3. rezultāts no 79.
137. lappuse
... examiner appears to [ 1 ] have taken a rather restricted in- terpretation of the term " predominant " as used in the claims in that he inter- prets the word in a quantitative sense . Appellant points out , however , that the used in the ...
... examiner appears to [ 1 ] have taken a rather restricted in- terpretation of the term " predominant " as used in the claims in that he inter- prets the word in a quantitative sense . Appellant points out , however , that the used in the ...
201. lappuse
... examiner has agreed to allow claims 10 , 11 and 12 if certain amendment is made . Applicant has made no response to this suggestion or to the rejection of claims 10 , 11 and 12 as indefinite . The examiner has rejected claim 13 as for ...
... examiner has agreed to allow claims 10 , 11 and 12 if certain amendment is made . Applicant has made no response to this suggestion or to the rejection of claims 10 , 11 and 12 as indefinite . The examiner has rejected claim 13 as for ...
238. lappuse
... Examiner de- nying said motion , which decision re- quired individually signed_and_sworn disclaimers by the parties Longini and Ostermann as a prerequisite to the al- lowance of said motion and said Board erred in not requiring said ...
... Examiner de- nying said motion , which decision re- quired individually signed_and_sworn disclaimers by the parties Longini and Ostermann as a prerequisite to the al- lowance of said motion and said Board erred in not requiring said ...
Saturs
ternational Braid Co CCA | 1 |
92 | 7 |
Richfield Oil Corp Black v | 12 |
Autortiesības | |
60 citas sadaļas nav parādītas.
Citi izdevumi - Skatīt visu
Bieži izmantoti vārdi un frāzes
acid action affirmed alleged allowed amount Appeals application associated Board called cause Circuit claims combination Company complaint connection considered containing contract Corporation cover Decided decision decree defendant defendant's denied described determine device directed disclosed disclosure dismissed District Court effect Electric elements evidence examiner fact fibers filed follows further glass granted ground held holding individual infringement interference invalid invention involved issue Judge judgment license limited lines machine manufacture material matter means ment metal method motion motor operation opinion original Particular parties Patent Office plaintiff portion position practice present pressure prior prior art question reason record reference refused registration rejected relates respect result royalties Rule similar specification substantially sufficient suit surface tion trade mark United USPQ validity York