The United States Patents Quarterly, 64. sējumsAssociated Industry Publications, 1945 |
No grāmatas satura
1.–3. rezultāts no 81.
306. lappuse
... decision in the earlier case will either have been taken to court , or will have become final . The motion is denied . Commissioner of Patents BOTANY WORSTED MILLS v . M. & W. THOMAS CORP . ( M. & W. THOMAS Co. , assignee , substituted ) ...
... decision in the earlier case will either have been taken to court , or will have become final . The motion is denied . Commissioner of Patents BOTANY WORSTED MILLS v . M. & W. THOMAS CORP . ( M. & W. THOMAS Co. , assignee , substituted ) ...
307. lappuse
... decision holding ex parte that the mark is not registrable . *** re- " Thus , if the applicant decides not to appeal from that part of the decision in which its application was rejected ex parte on the ground that applicant had rot used ...
... decision holding ex parte that the mark is not registrable . *** re- " Thus , if the applicant decides not to appeal from that part of the decision in which its application was rejected ex parte on the ground that applicant had rot used ...
309. lappuse
... decision of Decem- ber 29 , 1944 ( 64 USPQ 101 ) , reversing the decision of the Examiner of Inter- ferences and remanding the case for fur- ther proceedings . [ 1 ] The Examiner of Interferences dismissed the petition of J. Rosenholz ...
... decision of Decem- ber 29 , 1944 ( 64 USPQ 101 ) , reversing the decision of the Examiner of Inter- ferences and remanding the case for fur- ther proceedings . [ 1 ] The Examiner of Interferences dismissed the petition of J. Rosenholz ...
Saturs
ternational Braid Co CCA | 1 |
92 | 7 |
Richfield Oil Corp Black v | 12 |
Autortiesības | |
60 citas sadaļas nav parādītas.
Citi izdevumi - Skatīt visu
Bieži izmantoti vārdi un frāzes
acid action affirmed alleged allowed amount Appeals application associated Board called cause Circuit claims combination Company complaint connection considered containing contract Corporation cover Decided decision decree defendant defendant's denied described determine device directed disclosed disclosure dismissed District Court effect Electric elements evidence examiner fact fibers filed follows further glass granted ground held holding individual infringement interference invalid invention involved issue Judge judgment license limited lines machine manufacture material matter means ment metal method motion motor operation opinion original Particular parties Patent Office plaintiff portion position practice present pressure prior prior art question reason record reference refused registration rejected relates respect result royalties Rule similar specification substantially sufficient suit surface tion trade mark United USPQ validity York