The United States Patents Quarterly, 64. sējumsAssociated Industry Publications, 1945 |
No grāmatas satura
1.–3. rezultāts no 75.
236. lappuse
... Board to act contrary to its authority and contrary to law ; Board is only tribunal in Office before which is tried issue of priority of invention ; pri- mary examiner retains jurisdiction until interference is declared ; he determines ...
... Board to act contrary to its authority and contrary to law ; Board is only tribunal in Office before which is tried issue of priority of invention ; pri- mary examiner retains jurisdiction until interference is declared ; he determines ...
573. lappuse
... board that it properly defined his invention . [ 1 ] The board did not refer to the re- jection of claim 13 on the ground that it was indefinite , functional , and broader than appellant's invention as held by the examiner . However ...
... board that it properly defined his invention . [ 1 ] The board did not refer to the re- jection of claim 13 on the ground that it was indefinite , functional , and broader than appellant's invention as held by the examiner . However ...
604. lappuse
... Board has no authority to reopen application for further primary prosecu- tion ; that must be taken care of by petition . Ex parte Biggs ( PO BdApp ) 64 USPQ 431 . On reconsideration , applicant alleges surprise by reason of fact that ...
... Board has no authority to reopen application for further primary prosecu- tion ; that must be taken care of by petition . Ex parte Biggs ( PO BdApp ) 64 USPQ 431 . On reconsideration , applicant alleges surprise by reason of fact that ...
Saturs
ternational Braid Co CCA | 1 |
92 | 7 |
Richfield Oil Corp Black v | 12 |
Autortiesības | |
60 citas sadaļas nav parādītas.
Citi izdevumi - Skatīt visu
Bieži izmantoti vārdi un frāzes
acid action affirmed alleged allowed amount Appeals application associated Board called cause Circuit claims combination Company complaint connection considered containing contract Corporation cover Decided decision decree defendant defendant's denied described determine device directed disclosed disclosure dismissed District Court effect Electric elements evidence examiner fact fibers filed follows further glass granted ground held holding individual infringement interference invalid invention involved issue Judge judgment license limited lines machine manufacture material matter means ment metal method motion motor operation opinion original Particular parties Patent Office plaintiff portion position practice present pressure prior prior art question reason record reference refused registration rejected relates respect result royalties Rule similar specification substantially sufficient suit surface tion trade mark United USPQ validity York