ACT of B. N. A., 355, 32.—1774, 27.—Elizabeth, 28.-Quebec, 30,
114.-Quebec Legislature, 41.
ALABAMA INDIRECT CLAIMS, 185.-The Treaty of Washington, 185.—
The Canadian Claims, 185.-The General Tribunal, 186.-Re-
marks of Grotius.-View of the American Commissioners, 188.
-The Claim of the U. S., 188.-The British View of the Matter,
189.-Remarks of Sir Roundell Palmer, 190.-The Factum of
Great Britain, 190.-The Preamble of the Treaty, 191.-Remarks
of M. Hughes, 192.-The Extent of Responsibility, 193.-The
Code Napoleon, 194.-Remarks of Toullier, 195.-Remarks of
Larom biere, 195.-Remarks of Pothier, 196.-of Lord Bacon,
Sedgwick and others, 197.-Remarks of Bynkershoeh, 198.-Of
Grotius, Puffendorff & al, 199.-The Cases of Del Col. & Arnold;
of the Amiable Nancy, Anna Maria, &c., 201.-Remarks of
Blumtschli, 202.-Reasons why the Claims should be withdrawn,
202.-Remarks of Lord Derby, 204.-The Ghent, the Ashburton
and Oregon Treaties, 204.-The Navigation of the River St. Law-
rence, 204.
AMERICAN COMMISSIONERS, 188.
ANGLICAN CHURCH in Canada, 131.
APPEAL COURT. Vide Bench and Bar. Decisions in, 106, 230, 238, 470.
APPEAL for Usurpation, &c., in England, 11.-None allowed to dissent-
ing and R. C. Churches, 11.-Right of Order passed to Civil Courts
in the Colony, 12.-to Rome, 443.
APPEL Comme d'Abus, 124, 37.
ARRET of the 10th September, 1741.
ARTICLES OF CAPITULATION, 19.
ASSIGNMENT without Assets, 63.
BARNARD E. The Fraser Institute Case, 249.
BENCH AND BAR OF QUEBEC. The position as compared with fifty
years ago, 421.-The Act of 1849, 422. The Election of Baton-
nier, 423.-The Constitution of the Bench, 424.-The state of
the Appeal Court, 425.-The Judges of the Superior Court,
425. The influence of Politics, 426.-The duty of the Minister
of Justice, 426.
BENEFICES how granted in France, 7.
BIBLIOGRAPHY, 246.
BREF de PREROGATIVE, 226.
BRITISH NORTH AMERICA ACT. Vide Contempts, &c. Power Conferred
BURKE EDMUND, on the Treaty of Paris, 25.
CESSION OF CANADA, 10.
CHURCH AND STATE. Vide Ecclesiastical law. Ecclesiastical law under
the French Crown. 1.-Ecclesiastical law under the British Crown,
10. In temporal and mixed matters, 131.-Union between, 138.
CHURCH TEMPORALITIES, 4.
CLARKE, S. R. Contempts and the preservation of Order in Colonial
Parliaments, 354.
CONTEMPTS AND THE PRESERVATION OF ORDER IN COLONIAL PARLIA-
MENTS. The Powers of Colonial Parliaments to imprison for Con-
tempt, 354.-The constitution of the various Parliamentary bodies
in the Dominion, 354.-Cases cited, 354.—Decision prior to Con-
federation, 355.-Power conferred by the B. N. A. Act, 155.—
Statute 31st Vic. C. 23, 355.-Case of Victoria v. Glass, 356.-
Case of Doyle v. Falconer, 357.-Local Legislatures can only
obtain their privileges through the intervention of the Imperial
Parliament, 358.
CONVENTIONAL HYPOTHEC, 429.
Wills and Intestacy, 463.-Le Conseil Privé, 465.
CROSS, A., Q.C. The Frazer Institute Case, 249.
DECISIONS in the Court of Appeal, 106.—In the Court of Review, Mon-
trea!, 106.-In the Superior Court, Montreal, 107.-In the Court
of Review, Quebec, 110.-In the Superior Court, Quebec, 110.-
In the Circuit Court, Quebec, 112.-In the Privy Council,
229. In the Court of Appeal, Montreal, 230.-In the Court of
Review, Montreal, 232.-In the Superior Court, Montreal, 233.—
In the Circuit Court, Montreal, 234.-In the Vice-Admiralty
Court, Quebec, 237.-In the Court of Review, Quebec, 237.—In
the Superior Court, Quebec, 237.-In the Court of Queen's Bench,
Quebec, 238. In the Province of Ontario, 238.—In the Supreme
Court of N. B., 242.-Review from Magistrates Court, N.B., 245.—
From Queen's Bench, Montreal, 470.-From Court of Review,
Montreal, 475.-From Superior Court, Montreal, 477.-Decisions
in Ontario, 485.-In Superior Court, N.B., 487.
DEFINITION Of International law, 383.-" Due diligence," 389.
DOUTRE GONZALVE. L'Eglise & L'Etat, 33.
ECCLESIASTICAL LAW UNDER THE FRENCH CROWN. Revocation of In-
tendant Dupuy's Order of 1728, 1.—Intendant no jurisdiction in
Ecclesiastical matters, 1.—Judge in matters Civil and Criminal,
1.-Edict of Installation of Mgr. de Pontbriand, 1.—King con-
firms the Bulls granted to that Bishop, 2.-Edict does not say
that the liberties of the Gallican Church ever did exist in Canada,
2.—The name “"Catholic, Apostolic and Roman," 2.-The Court
of the Officiality, 2.-The Superior Council of Quebec, 3.-Case of
the Grand Chantre de Merlac, 3.-Case of St. Fort, 3.—Arret of the
10th Sept. 1714, 3.-Case of the Widow Peuvret, 3.-Judgment
of 12th June, 1741, 3.-Affair of the Canon Tonnancourt and the
Curè Recher, 4.-Temporalities of the Church, 4.-Judgment in
cases cited not final, 4.-No lawyers in the Colony, 5.-Decision
of 1714, 5.—Instructions given by the King to de Tracy, 5.-In-
structions to M. Falon, 5.-Instructions to M. Frontenac, 5.-Be-
nefices how granted in France, 7.-Ecclesiastical law of France
did not pass into the Colony, 8.—The jurisdiction of the Superior
Council, 8.-Letter of Governor de Beauharnois to the French
Court, 9.-Edict of 1695, 9.—Officiality of the Bishop of Quebec, 10.
ECCLESIASTICAL LAW UNDER THE BRITISH CROWN. The cession of La
Nouvelle France, 10.-Appeal for usurpation and abuse in Eng-
land, 11.-No appeal allowed to dissenting and R. C. Churches,
11. The right of appeal never passed to the Civil Courts of the
Colony, 12.-Case of Rev. W. Lang, 13.-Case of Dr. Colenso, 13.
-Case of Lord Bishop of Capetown, 14.-Supremacy of the Crown,
14.-Submission of the Clergy Act, 14.-The law in the United
States, 15. Decisions of Mr. Justice Nicholls in Louisiana, 15.—
Statute of 14 Henry VIII. 16.-Statute of 25 Henry VIII. 17.-
Statute 28 Henry VIII. 17.-Evidence of Right Hon. D. McNeil,
18.—Remarks of Lord Mansfield, 18.—Articles of Capitulation—
Dicta thereon, 19.-The Treaty of Peace, 20.-Remarks of M.
Jetté, 20.—Remarks of M. Laflamme, 21.—Opinion given to the
English Government on the 3rd July, 22.-Opinion of Attorney
General Sewell, 22.-Conversation between Bishop Plesses and
the Attorney General, 23.-Opinions of English Crown lawyers,
24.-Query of the Lords of Trade, 25.-Remarks of Lords North,
and Thurlow, and Edmund Burke on the Treaty of Paris, 25.-
Remarks of Stokes, Chief Justice of Georgia, 26.—Imperial Act of
1774, 27. Statute of Elizabeth, 28.-Opinion of Lord Castlereagh,
28.—Debate on the Quebec Act, 30.—British North America Act,
32. The spiritual authority of the Sovereign over Colonial
Churches, 113-The Provisional Government created in 1763,
113. The Quebec Act, 114.-Remarks of Mr. Justice Badgley
thereon, 114.-Remarks of C.J. Draper, 115.-What the expression
Civil Rights comprises, 116.—The case of Ferland and Deguise,
116. Superior Court constituted in 1849, 117.-Judgment in
Ferland and Deguise, 118.-Case of Champlain and Vezina, 120.
-Case of Naud and Lord Bishop of Montreal, 121.—Case of Har-
nois and Messire Rouisse, 121.- Burial case reported by Mr.
Justice Berthelot, 122.-Remarks of Judge Morin, 123.-Case of
Wurtele and Lord Bishop of Quebec, 123.—Decision of Mr. Jus-
tice Mondelet, that the Appel Comme d'Abus exists in Canada,
124. Decision of Mr. Justice MacKay, 125-Remarks of Mr.
Justice Berthelot, 126.—Remarks of Messrs. Badgley and Monk,
J. J, in Court of Appeal, 128-Remarks of Judges Drummond
and Caron, 129.—Remarks of Chief Justice Duval, 130.—Temporal
and mixed matters, 131.-Anglican Church in Canada, 131.—Pri-
vileges of General Assembly, 132.-Ecclesiastical Institutions of
Nova Scotia, 132.-Of Quebec, 133.-Rights of Ecclesiastical Cor-
porations of Quebec, 134.-Ecclesiastical law applicable to Pro-
testant Churches of Canada, 135.-The law in secular matters,
135.-Cases cited, 136.-Opinion of Doucet, 138.-Union between
Church and State in Canada, 138.-Cases cited, 140.-Decisions
in the Guibord case, 141.-Marriage of a deceased wife's sister,
145.-Necessity of harmony between Church and State, 146.
EDICT of 1695, 9.—Of 1743, 259, 281, 296.
EXPROPRIATION. Very little established jurisprudence in this Pro-
vince on the subject, 70. The state of the law of expropriation in
ancient Rome, France and England, 70.-What indemnity should
be allowed, 71.-The relations between individuals and the State,
71.—The Powers and Supremacy of the State, 71.—The old French
law, 71.-The Royal authority, 72.-The law under Louis XIV.
73.- The Code Napoleon, 73.—No fixed jurisprudence on Expro-
priation under the old regime, 73.-The opinion of Del-Marmol,
74. The opinion of Debray, 74.-The opinion of De Lalleau, 74.
-The opinion of Herson, 74.-The Constitution of 1791, 75.-
The opinion of Proudham, 75.—The law of England prior to the
Revolution of 1688. The opinion of Blackstone, 76.—The case of
the Cast Plate Manufacturers v. Meredith, 77.-The decision of
Buller, J., 77.—Expropriation for Cemeteries, 79.-The Arret of
January 1633, 79.-The Church a right to Expropriation next
after the King, 80.-The ord, of Philip Le-Bel, 81.-The Cemetery
as compared with the Hospital, 82.-Ordinance of 1306, 82.—Opin-
ion of Merlin, 83.-Authorities cited, 85-The case of the Mount
Royal Cemetery, 86.-Question as to the powers of the Local Legis-
lature, 87.—Case of Municipal Cemeteries, 87.-The Act of the
Imperial Parliament relative to Cemeteries, 88.-The Burial Acts,
88.-State of the law at Rome, 206.-Opinion of Proudhon, 207.-
The law in Italy, 210.-The law of the Code, 212.-The Justinian
Code, 213.-Opinion of De Fresquet, 214.-Views of Serringy and
Bathie, 215.-Modern law of France, 216-The English law, 217.
-The law of 1810 defective, 219, and also the law of 1833, which
gave rise to the law of 1841, 220.
FACTUM of Great Britain in re Alabama Claims, 190.
FRASER INSTITUTE CASE. The declaration, 249.-Defendants Plea,
252.—The Will, 253--The Codicil, 257.—Argument of Mr. La-
flamme, Q.C., 258.-Edict of 1743, 259.-The case of Desrivieres
and Richardson, 266.-The Will of James McGill, 266.-Action
arising out of it, 266.—Decision of Court of Appeal thereon, 268-
Opinion of Judge Aylwin, 269.-The case of the Boston Mining
Company and Desbarats, 270.—The law of the Code, 272.—Ap-
pellants second point, 274.-Remarks of Troplong, 276; of Po.
thier, 276; of Demolombe, 277.--Appellants' third point, 280.--
Edict of 1743 cited, 281.-Appellants' fourth point, 282.-The
English law of Mortmain, 282.-Jarman on Wills cited, 283.—Ap-
pellants' fifth point, 285.-Statutes of 1801, 285.-Guyot cited, 266.
-Judge Beaudry's decision, 287.-Argument of Mr. Barnard for
Respondent, 294.-Ordinanee of 1743 cited, 296.-Remarks of Le-
febre, 299.-The old French law, 302.-Troplong cited, 303.—
English law, 304-Law in the U. S., 305.-Authorities cited
310. Our law different from that of 1743, 313.-Validity of the,
Will under Article 869 of the Code, 319.-Remarks of Judge Kerr,
327.-Remarks of Judge Pyke, 328.-Case of Freligh and Seymour,
330.-Conclusion, 332.-Remark of Lord Coke, 335.-Jarman on
Mortmain, 336.-Statute of Mortmain, 337.-Argument of Mr.
Cross, Q.C., 338.-Restriction as to Corporation, 340.-Queen's
prerogative to create Corporations, 342.-Authorities cited, 342.—
Argument of Mr. Laflamme, Q.C., 346.-Authorities cited by him,
347. The power of creating Corporations, 349.-Case of Hawkins
and Allen, 353.
GALLICAN CHURCH in Canada, Vide Ecclesiastical law.
GENEVA AWARD. The manner in which it has been received by the
press of England, 381,-The decision a triumph for the Ameri-
cans, 381.-Remarks of Sir A. Cockburn, 382.-His definition of
International law, 383.-Due diligence, 384. Authorities cited,
385.-Arguments of Mr. Adams, 389.-Argument of Vicompte d'-
Itajuba, 392.-Argument of M. Starmpfli, 394.-Argument of
Comte Sclopis, 395.-Text of the decision, 401.
GIROUARD, D. Church and State 1, 113.-Railway Grants, 44.-In-
solvency questions, 63.—The Alabama Indirect Claims, 185.—
La Legislation Provinciale de 1871, 221.-Les Promesses de
Mariages sont elles valides en droit, 358.-The Geneva Award,
381.-The Treaty of Washington before the Parliament of
Canada, 409.-Of mortgages passed out of the presence of the
Creditor, 427.
GRAY, HON. J. H. Wills and intestacy, 147.
INDEMNITY in Expropriation, 71.
INSOLVENCY. Assigning without assets, 63.-Decision of Sutherland,
J., 63-Decision of Jones, J., 63.—Not obligatory on Insolvent to
produce any assets, 64.-Discharge granted by the Court, 65.-
Person ceasing to be a trader taking benefit of Act, 65.-The case
of J. E. Villeneuve, 65.-The case of Archibald and al. of Nova
Scotia, 66. Judgment of Young, C. J., 66.-The case of Surtees
aud Ellison, 66.-The policy of the Imperial and Colonial Legis-
latures from time to time, 67.—Traders and non-traders. 67.-The
Act of '69, 67.-Lord Tenterden's opinion, 67.-The opinion of the
Dominion Parliament, 68.-The case of Simpson's Estate, 68.-
The law in the United States, 68.-The Statute of Limitations,
69. The case of Wright and Hall, 69.—The case of Freeman and
Moyes, 69.-The case of "The Ironsides," 69.-The case of Cornill
and Huddon, 69.—the case of Coulson and Sangster, 69.
|