pellants should the appeals ultimately go against them. In any event, if the appeals are without substance and should therefore be dismissed as frivolous, that conclusion ought to be capable of being summarily determined by the Court of Appeals without further delay. The disposition this Court is making of these motions is a shortcut that seems to me to disregard the relevant considerations for the exercise of appellate jurisdiction. Certiorari Granted. (See also No. 500, ante, p. 38, and No. 670, supra.) No. 583. REILLY, POSTMASTER, v. PINKUS, TRADING AS AMERICAN HEALTH AIDS Co., ALSO KNOWN AS ENERGY FOOD CENTER. C. A. 3d Cir.. Certiorari granted. Solicitor General Perlman for petitioner. Bernard G. Segal and Irving R. Segal for respondent. Reported below: 170 F.2d 786. Certiorari Denied. (See also No. 437, Misc., supra.) No. 561. BROADHURST V. OREGON. Supreme Court of Oregon. Certiorari denied. W. H. Langroise for petitioner. Reported below: 184 Ore. 178, 196 P. 2d 407. No. 592. HOWELL v. UNITED STATES. C. A. 4th Cir. Certiorari denied. J. Raymond Gordon for petitioner. Solicitor General Perlman, Assistant Attorney General Campbell and Robert S. Erdahl for the United States. Reported below: 172 F. 2d 213.. No. 625. UNITED STATES v. FAUBER, ADMINISTRATRIX. Court of Claims. Certiorari denied. Solicitor General Perlman for the United States. Arlon V. Cushman, John J. Darby, William M. Cushman and C. Willard Hayes for respondent. Reported below: 112 Ct. Cl. 302, 81 F. Supp. 218. No. 673. Scocozza et al. v. ERIE RAILROAD CO. C. A. 2d Cir. Certiorari denied. William J. Dempsey for petitioners. Theodore Kiendl, Edward J. McGratty, Jr. and Cleveland C. Cory for respondent. Reported below: 171 F.2d 745. No. 681. SHAW v. DREYFUS ET AL. C. A. 2d Cir. Certiorari denied. Morris J. Levy for petitioner. John A. Wilson for respondents. Reported below: 172 F. 2d 140. No. 682. MATHER & Co. v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE. C. A. 3d Cir. Certiorari denied. Frederick H. Spotts, Thomas Stokes and George Wharton Pepper for petitioner. Solicitor General Perlman, Assistant Attorney General Caudle, Ellis N. Slack, Lee A. Jackson and S. Walter Shine for respondent. Reported below: 171 F.2d 864. No. 683. HARTMANN v. AMERICAN NEWS Co. C. A. 7th Cir. Certiorari denied. Alfred A. Albert for petitioner. William D. Whitney for respondent. Reported below: 171 F. 2d 581. No. 686. DUNNELL v. SAFEWAY STORES, INC. C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied. Emory L. Groff for petitioner. George Herrington for respondent. Reported below: 172 F. 2d 649. Nos. 687 and 688. METROPOLITAN TRUST Co. v. MUTER COMPANY ET AL. C. A. 7th Cir. Certiorari denied. Thomas D. Nash for petitioner. Thomas Dodd Healy and A. Bradley Eben for respondents. Reported below: 171 F.2d 380. No. 702. HARBOR TOWING CORP. v. PARKER ET AL. C. A. 4th Cir. Certiorari denied. John H. Skeen for petitioner. George W. P. Whip for Parker, respondent. Reported below: 171 F. 2d 416. No. 714. UPDIKE ET AL., DOING BUSINESS AS UPDIKE AWNING CO., v. WEST ET AL. C. A. 10th Cir. Certiorari denied. Glenn O. Young for petitioners. Frank Settle and E. O. Monnet for West et al., respondents. Reported below: 172 F.2d 663. No. 741. REPUBLIC OF THE UNITED STATES of Brazil, TRADING AS LLOYD BRASILEIRO, v. GENERAL FOODS CORP. C. A. 2d Cir. Certiorari denied. Frank J. McConnell for petitioner. Henry N. Longley and John W. R. Zisgen for respondent. Reported below: 172 F. 2d 131. Nos. 526 and 527. SIOUX TRIBE OF INDIANS v. UNITED STATES. Court of Claims. Certiorari denied. Ralph H. Case and James S. Y. Ivins for petitioner. Solicitor General Perlman, Assistant Attorney General Vanech and John R. Benney for the United States. Reported below: 112 Ct. Cl. 39, 50, 78 F. Supp. 787, 793. No. 648. DEWAR v. HUNTER, WARDEN. C. A. 10th Cir. Certiorari denied. Howard F. McCue for petitioner. Solicitor General Perlman, Assistant Attorney General Campbell, Robert S. Erdahl and Philip R. Monahan for respondent. Reported below: 170 F. 2d 993. No. 432, Misc. LOUGHRAN v. MARYLAND. Court of Joseph KaMd. 64 No. 436, Misc. CULVER ET AL. v. CARTER OIL Co. et al. C. A. 6th Cir. Certiorari denied. Thaddeus Greene Ben ton and William J. Hughes, Jr. for petitioners. William M. Acton for respondents. Reported below: 170 F. 2d 147. No. 454, Misc. MARTINEZ V. CALIFORNIA. District Court of Appeal, First Appellate District, of California. Certiorari denied. Elizabeth Cassidy for petitioner. Reported below: 88 Cal. App. 2d 767, 199 P. 2d 375. No. 480, Misc. AGNEW v. CALIFORNIA. Supreme Court of California. Certiorari denied. No. 490, Misc. COYLE v. CALIFORNIA ET AL. Supreme Court of California. Certiorari denied. No. 537, Misc. COUTURE v. SMITH, SUPERINTENDENT. Supreme Court of Washington. Certiorari denied. No. 550, Misc. MORANT v. NEW YORK. Court of Appeals of New York. Certiorari denied. No. 554, Misc. FRANKLIN V. RAGEN, WARDEN. Crim-. inal Court of Cook County, Illinois. Certiorari denied. No. 560, Misc. WAKAT V. RAGEN, WARDEN. Supreme Court of Illinois. Certiorari denied. No. 565, Misc. TWITTY V. ILLINOIS. Supreme Court of Illinois. Certiorari denied. No. 566, Misc. CROWLEY V. RAGEN, WARDEN. Supreme Court of Illinois. Certiorari denied. No. 567, Misc. REEVES v. RAGEN, WARDEN. Circuit Court of Iroquois County, Illinois. Certiorari denied. No. 568, Misc. SCOTT v. RAGEN, WARDEN. Criminal Court of Cook County, Illinois. Certiorari denied. No. 569, Misc. MICHAEL v. RAGEN, WARDEN. Criminal Court of Cook County and Supreme Court of Illinois. Certiorari denied. No. 571, Misc. LUTZ v. RAGEN, WARDEN. C. A. 7th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 171 F. 2d 788. No. 572, Misc. TERRY V. RAGEN, WARDEN. Criminal Court of Cook County, Illinois. Certiorari denied. No. 573, Misc. GAMBONY V. ILLINOIS. Supreme Court of Illinois. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 402 Ill. 74, 83 N. E. 2d 321. No. 575, Misc. DZAN v. RAGEN, WARDEN. Supreme Court of Illinois. Certiorari denied. No. 577, Misc. HAMILTON v. RAGEN, WARDEN. Circuit Court of Saline County and Supreme Court of Illinois. Certiorari denied. Rehearing Granted. No. 185. GRAVER TANK & MFG. CO., INC. v. LINDE AIR PRODUCTS Co., 336 U. S. 271. The petition for rehearing is granted, limited to the question of infringement of Claims 18, 20, 22 and 23 of the Jones et al. patent. The Court desires argument as to the applicability of |