| United States. Congress. House. Committee on Patents - 1924 - 394 lapas
...they are very imperfectly protected. Performances not differing in kind from those of the defendant's could be given that might compete with and even destroy the success of the monopoly that the law intended the plaintiff .to have. It is enough to say that there is no need to construe the statute... | |
| United States. Congress. House. Committee on Patents - 1936 - 1578 lapas
...ESSENTIAL If the rights under the copyright are infringed only by a performance where money is taken at the door they are very imperfectly protected. Performances not different in kind from those of the defendant could be given that might compete with and even destroy the success of the monopoly the law... | |
| United States. Congress. House. Committee on Patents - 1936 - 1614 lapas
...ESSENTIAL If the rights under the copyright are infringed only by n performance where money is taken at the door they are very imperfectly protected. Performances not different in kind from those of the defendant could be given that might compete with and even destroy the success of the monopoly the law... | |
| United States. Congress. Senate. Committee on the Judiciary - 1958 - 312 lapas
...US 593 : "If the rights under the copyright are infringed only by a performance where money is taken at the door they are very imperfectly protected. Performances...the success of the monopoly that the law intends the plaintiff t<' have." In Donaldson, Douglas & Gumble, Inc., v. Terris, Copyright Office Bulletin No.... | |
| Paul Goldstein - 2003 - 262 lapas
...value. "If the rights under the copyright are infringed only by a performance where money is taken at the door they are very imperfectly protected. Performances...monopoly that the law intends the plaintiffs to have." Holmes quickly perceived the value in these performances. The only question was who got to reap that... | |
| United States. Congress. House. Committee on the Judiciary - 1947 - 1730 lapas
...Holmes said: If the rights under the copyright are infringed only by a performance where money is taken at the door, they are very imperfectly protected....different in kind from those of the defendants could lie given that might compete with and even destroy the success of the monopoly that the law intends... | |
| |