JURISDICTION-Continued.

tioner all-male honorary society to conduct initiation ceremony on campus,
(2) university thereafter prohibited ceremony, (3) petitioner then brought
an action in Federal District Court challenging Secretary's interpretation
of regulation, and (4) before Court of Appeals affirmed summary judgment
for Secretary, university's president wrote a letter to petitioner stating
that regardless of lawsuit's outcome, petitioner could not conduct activities
on campus until it discontinued its sexually discriminatory membership
policy, letter rendered case moot and Court of Appeals had no jurisdiction
to decide it. Iron Arrow Honor Society v. Heckler, p. 67.
JURORS. See also Constitutional Law, I; Habeas Corpus, 1.

Voir dire examination-Peremptory challenges.—In action by respond-
ent parents and son to recover for injuries sustained by son while operating
a lawnmower manufactured by petitioner where jury returned a verdict for
petitioner, Court of Appeals erred in holding that new trial should have
been granted because respondents' right of peremptory challenge of jurors
was prejudiced when one of jurors did not respond to a question on voir
dire seeking information concerning injuries of family members although
juror's son had sustained a broken leg as a result of an exploding tire; re-
spondents were not entitled to a new trial unless juror's failure to disclose
denied them their right to an impartial jury. McDonough Power Equip-
ment, Inc. v. Greenwood, p. 548.

JURY SELECTION. See Constitutional Law, I; Jurors.

LEASES OF OIL AND GAS LANDS. See Coastal Zone Management
Act; Internal Revenue Code, 2; Stays, 7.

LIMITATION OF ACTIONS. See Internal Revenue Code, 1.

MOOTNESS. See Jurisdiction.

NATURALIZATION OF ALIENS. See Collateral Estoppel, 2.

NEWS MEDIA'S RIGHT TO ATTEND VOIR DIRE EXAMINATION
OF JURORS. See Constitutional Law, I.

NUCLEAR CONTAMINATION. See Atomic Energy Act of 1954.
OIL DEPLETION ALLOWANCE. See Internal Revenue Code, 2.
OIL LEASES. See Coastal Zone Management Act; Internal Revenue
Code, 2; Stays, 7.

OKLAHOMA. See Atomic Energy Act of 1954.

ORGANIZED CRIME CONTROL ACT OF 1970. See Criminal Law.
OUTER CONTINENTAL SHELF LANDS ACT OF 1953. See Coastal
Zone Management Act.

OUTER CONTINENTAL SHELF OIL AND GAS LEASES.
Coastal Zone Management Act; Stays, 7.

See

PER DIEM ALLOWANCE TO GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES. See
Civil Service Reform Act of 1978.

PEREMPTORY CHALLENGES OF JURORS. See Jurors.

PRE-EMPTION OF STATE LAW BY FEDERAL LAW. See Airport
Development Acceleration Act of 1973; Atomic Energy Act of 1954.
PRESS' AND PUBLIC'S ACCESS TO VOIR DIRE EXAMINATION
OF JURORS. See Constitutional Law, I.

PRICE-ANDERSON ACT. See Atomic Energy Act of 1954.

PROCEDURE.

Vacation of Court of Appeals' judgment-Remand.-Court of Appeals'
judgment was vacated, and case was remanded, since Government's con-
cession that District Court erroneously refused to give petitioner's charac-
ter evidence instruction to jury in criminal case, as well as Government's
contention that such error was harmless, should have been presented to
Court of Appeals in first instance. Torres-Valencia v. United States,
p. 44.

PRODUCTS LIABILITY. See Jurors.

PROPORTIONALITY OF DEATH SENTENCE. See Stays, 4, 5.
PUBLIC EMPLOYEES. See Civil Service Reform Act of 1978.
PUNITIVE DAMAGES. See Atomic Energy Act of 1954.

RACKETEERING. See Criminal Law.

RADIATION INJURIES. See Atomic Energy Act of 1954.

RECORDING TELEVISION PROGRAMS. See Copyrights.

RELOCATION OF TELEPHONE COMPANY'S FACILITIES.

See

Uniform Relocation Assistance and Real Property Acquisition
Policies Act of 1970.

RIGHT OF ACCESS TO CRIMINAL TRIALS. See Constitutional
Law, I.

RIGHT TO FAIR TRIAL. See Constitutional Law, I; Jurors.

SEARCHES AND SEIZURES. See Constitutional Law, II.

SEX DISCRIMINATION. See Jurisdiction.

SHAREHOLDERS' SUITS. See Investment Company Act of 1940.
STATE INCOME TAXES. See Airport Development Acceleration Act
of 1973.

STATUTES OF LIMITATIONS. See Internal Revenue Code, 1.

STAYS.

1. Death sentence.-Applications to stay executions are granted, where
each execution was set for a date within period for petitioning this Court
for certiorari to review Missouri Supreme Court's affirmance of each con-
viction and sentence. McDonald v. Missouri (BLACKMUN, J., in cham-
bers), p. 1306.

2. Death sentence.-Application to stay execution is denied, where all
of applicant's constitutional claims were previously considered in earlier
proceedings in state and federal courts. Sullivan v. Wainwright, p. 109.

3. Death sentence.-Application to stay execution is denied, where
fewer than four Justices would grant certiorari to review Federal Court
of Appeals' affirmance of District Court's denial of habeas corpus relief
to applicant state prisoner; this Court will not adopt a rule calling for
an automatic stay where applicant is seeking review of denial of his first
federal habeas corpus petition. Autry v. Estelle, p. 1.

4. Death sentence.-Application to stay execution is granted pending
Court of Appeals' disposition of appeal from District Court's denial of
habeas corpus relief-sought for first time on ground of Texas Court of
Criminal Appeals' failure to consider proportionality of death sentence-or
until a further order by this Court or by Circuit Justice. Autry v. Estelle
(WHITE, J., in chambers), p. 1301.

5. Death sentence-Vacation of stay.-Application to vacate Court
of Appeals' stay of respondent's execution, pending either this Court's
anticipated review of law concerning state-court procedures for review
of proportionality of death sentences or this Court's further directions, is
granted. Maggio v. Williams, p. 46.

6. Death sentence-Vacation of stay.-Application to vacate Federal
Circuit Judge's order staying respondent's execution is granted. Woodard
v. Hutchins, p. 377.

7. Sale of Outer Continental Shelf tracts.-Applications to stay District
Court's preliminary injunction prohibiting Secretary of Interior from con-
ducting a sale of certain tracts on Pacific Outer Continental Shelf for oil and
gas leasing are granted. Clark v. California (REHNQUIST, J., in cham-
bers), p. 1304.

SUBPOENAS DUCES TECUM ISSUED BY LABOR DEPART-
MENT. See Constitutional Law, II, 2.

SUPREME COURT.

1. Assignment of Justice Stewart (retired) to the United States Court of
Appeals for the First Circuit, p. 1027.

2. Assignment of Justice Stewart (retired) to the United States Court of
Appeals for the Third Circuit, p. 1074.

SUSPENSION OF DEPORTATION. See Immigration and National-
ity Act.

TAPE-RECORDING TELEVISION PROGRAMS. See Copyrights.
TAXES. See Airport Development Acceleration Act of 1973; Internal
Revenue Code.

TAX REDUCTION ACT OF 1975. See Internal Revenue Code, 2.
TELEPHONE COMPANIES. See Uniform Relocation Assistance and
Real Property Acquisition Policies Act of 1970.

TELEVISION. See Copyrights.

TRAVEL EXPENSES OF GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES. See Civil
Service Reform Act of 1978.

UNIFORM RELOCATION ASSISTANCE AND REAL PROPERTY
ACQUISITION POLICIES ACT OF 1970.

"Displaced person"-Telephone company.-Where respondent company
was required to relocate telephone transmission facilities because of a
street realignment resulting from federally funded urban renewal project
carried out by petitioner, a political subdivision of State, respondent was
not a "displaced person" entitled to relocation benefits under Act. Norfolk
Redevelopment & Housing Authority v. Chesapeake & Potomac Telephone
Co., p. 30.

UNION REPRESENTATIVES. See Civil Service Reform Act of 1978.
UNIVERSITY'S ASSISTANCE OF ALL-MALE HONORARY SOCI-
ETY. See Jurisdiction.

URBAN RENEWAL PROJECTS. See Uniform Relocation Assistance
and Real Property Acquisition Policies Act of 1970.

VACATION OF STAYS. See Stays, 5, 6.

VICARIOUS LIABILITY FOR COPYRIGHT INFRINGEMENT. See
Copyrights.

VIDEO TAPE RECORDERS. See Copyrights.

VOIR DIRE EXAMINATION OF JURORS. See Constitutional Law,
I; Jurors.

WORDS AND PHRASES.

1. "Directly affecting the coastal zone." $307(c)(1), Coastal Zone
Management Act, 16 U. S. C. § 1456(c)(1) (1982 ed.). Secretary of Inte-
rior v. California, p. 312.

2. "Displaced person." § 101(6), Uniform Relocation Assistance and
Real Property Acquisition Policies Act of 1970, 42 U. S. C. § 4601(6).
Norfolk Redevelopment & Housing Authority v. Chesapeake & Potomac
Telephone Co., p. 30.

3. "Interest." 18 U. S. C. § 1963(a)(1). Russello v. United States,
p. 16.

U.S. GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE : 1986 0

-

431-673 QL 3