No. 82-1998. CLARK, SECRETARY OF THE INTERIOR, ET AL. V. COMMUNITY FOR CREATIVE NON-VIOLENCE ET AL. C. A. D. C. Cir. [Certiorari granted sub nom. Watt v. Community for Creative Non-Violence, ante, p. 812.] Motion of respondents for leave to file supplemental joint appendix not in compliance with this Court's Rule 33 denied. JUSTICE BLACKMUN and JUSTICE STEVENS Would grant this motion. No. 82-6956. CROSS v. SECRETARY OF STATE, ante, p. 928. Motion of appellant for reconsideration of order denying leave to proceed in forma pauperis denied. No. 83-623. JAMES ET AL. v. CLARK, SECRETARY OF THE INTERIOR, ET AL. C. A. 1st Cir. Motion of petitioners to defer consideration of the petition for writ of certiorari denied. No. 83-5040. ENO ET AL. v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT ET AL., ante, p. 928. Motion of petitioners for reconsideration of order denying leave to proceed in forma pauperis denied. No. 83-5611. WINDSOR v. THE TENNESSEAN ET AL. Ct. App. Tenn. Motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in forma pauperis denied. Petitioner is allowed until January 3, 1984, within which to pay the docketing fee required by Rule 45(a) and to submit a petition in compliance with Rule 33 of the Rules of this Court. JUSTICE BRENNAN, JUSTICE MARSHALL, and JUSTICE STEVENS, dissenting. For the reasons expressed in Brown v. Herald Co., ante, p. 928, we would deny the petition for certiorari in this case without reaching the merits of the motion to proceed in forma pauperis. No. 83-5601. IN RE WILLIAMS. Petition for writ of mandamus denied. Probable Jurisdiction Noted No. 83-297. ARMCO INC. v. HARDESTY, TAX COMMISSIONER OF WEST VIRGINIA. Appeal from Sup. Ct. App. W. Va. Probable jurisdiction noted. Reported below: W. Va. S. E. 2d 706. 303 464 U. S. No. 83-490. 11th Cir. 2d 838. December 12, 1983 DAVIS ET AL. v. SCHERER. Appeal from C. A. Probable jurisdiction noted. Reported below: 710 F. Certiorari Granted No. 82-2140. HOBBY v. UNITED STATES. C. A. 4th Cir. Certiorari granted limited to Question 3 presented by the petition. Reported below: 702 F. 2d 466. No. 83-328. MABRY, COMMISSIONER, ARKANSAS DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTION v. JOHNSON. C. A. 8th Cir. Motion of respondent for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and certiorari granted. Reported below: 707 F. 2d 323. Certiorari Denied. (See also No. 83-662, supra.) No. 82-7014. Certiorari denied. No. 83-295. tiorari denied. No. 83-320. THOMPSON v. UNITED STATES. C. A. 5th Cir. COSTA v. MARKEY ET AL. C. A. 1st Cir. Cer- ANDERSON COUNTY, TENNESSEE, ET AL. v. UNITED STATES. C. A. 6th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 705 F. 2d 184. No. 83-359. YAVAPAI-PRESCOTT INDIAN TRIBE v. CLARK, SECRETARY OF THE INTERIOR, ET AL. C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 707 F. 2d 1072. No. 83-484. No. 83-485. C. A. 2d Cir. 1554. SLEVIN ET AL. v. CITY OF NEW YORK ET AL.; and No. 83-588. BERGER v. MCMONAGLE, JUDGE, ET AL. Sup. Ct. Ohio. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 6 Ohio St. 3d 28, 451 N. E. 2d 225. No. 83-647. LUI SU NAI-CHAO, INDIVIDUALLY AND AS PERSONAL REPRESENTATIVE OF THE ESTATE OF LUI CHO-PON, ET AL. v. BOEING CO. ET AL. C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 708 F. 2d 1406. No. 83-657. UNGER v. CONSOLIDATED FOODS CORP. C. A. 7th Cir. Certiorari denied. No. 83-660. KEASLER v. GRANAT. Sup. Ct. Wash. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 99 Wash. 2d 564, 663 P. 2d 830. No. 83-666. v. HERRING V. FLORIDA. Dist. Ct. App. Fla., 3d Dist. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 435 So. 2d 865. No. 83-668. PACE v. SOUTHERN RAILWAY CO. C. A. 11th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 701 F. 2d 1383. No. 83-670. GUNTER v. KENTUCKY. Ct. App. Ky. Certiorari denied. No. 83-675. MITLO v. UNITED STATES. C. A. 3d Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 714 F. 2d 294. No. 83-784. C. A. 2d Cir. No. 83-792. BUFFALO FORGE CO. ET AL. v. OGDEN CORP. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 717 F. 2d 757. CALDEVILLA v. UNITED STATES. C. A. 11th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 716 F. 2d 913. No. 83-800. tiorari denied. CICCONI v. UNITED STATES. C. A. 3d Cir. Cer- No. 83-813. ALLEN ET AL. v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE. C. A. 11th Cir. Certiorari denied. below: 707 F. 2d 522. No. 83-5306. Certiorari denied. No. 83-5332. Reported FINCH V. UNITED STATES. C. A. 11th Cir. WILLIAMSON v. WISCONSIN. Sup. Ct. Wis. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 113 Wis. 2d 389, 335 N. W. 2d 814. No. 83-5410. MILLS v. COUNTY OF MONROE. Ct. App. N. Y. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 59 N. Y. 2d 307, 451 N. E. 2d 456. No. 83-5420. INGRAHAM v. MCCARTHY ET AL. C. A. 1st Cir. Certiorari denied. No. 83-5465. KINCAID v. EBERLE. C. A. 7th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 712 F. 2d 1023. No. 83-5540. EVANS v. NEW YORK. N. Y., 2d Jud. Dept. Certiorari denied. App. Div. 2d 843, 464 N. Y. S. 2d 1020. App. Div., Sup. Ct. Reported below: 96 No. 83-5543. GENTSCH v. LOWE, CLERK, ET AL. C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied. No. 83-5604. JOHNSON v. TENNESSEE DEPARTMENT OF EMPLOYMENT SECURITY ET AL. Sup. Ct. Tenn. Certiorari denied. No. 83-5608. BEADLE v. MCKASKLE, ACTING DIRECTOR, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS. C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 711 F. 2d 1053. No. 83-5610. PAYNE v. JANASZ, CHIEF PROBATION OFFICER, CUYAHOGA COUNTY. C. A. 6th Cir. Certiorari denied. ported below: 711 F. 2d 1305. No. 83-5616. C. A. 10th Cir. Re IGOE v. JONES, DBA G & L INVESTMENTS, INC. No. 83-5627. BROWN v. WAINWRIGHT, SECRETARY, FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, ET AL. C. A. 11th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 712 F. 2d 1417. No. 83-5628. CHYLICKA ET AL. v. UNITED STATES CATHOLIC CONFERENCE "CARITAS" ET AL. C. A. 2d Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 742 F. 2d 1437. No. 83-5633. BROWN v. RICE ET AL. C. A. 4th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 711 F. 2d 1049. No. 83-5638. SKAGGS ET AL. v. CRAWFORD COUNTY, OHIO, ET AL. C. A. 11th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 708 F. 2d 732. No. 83-5649. CHAVEZ V. BERNALILLO COUNTY DISTRICT COURT. Sup. Ct. N. M. Certiorari denied. No. 83-5668. NEAL v. ALABAMA. Sup. Ct. Ala. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 441 So. 2d 139. No. 83-5683. BROWN v. UNITED STATES. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 709 F. 2d 14. C. A. 6th Cir. No. 83-5693. MILLER ET AL. v. UNION STATE BANK. Sup. Ct. N. D. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 335 N. W. 2d 807. No. 83-5704. ESGATE v. UNITED STATES. C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 718 F. 2d 1109. No. 83-5726. VANDYKE V. WAWRZASZEK, ADMINISTRATOR, ARIZONA STATE PRISON. C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 714 F. 2d 156. No. 83-5727. WILLIAMS v. OHIO. Sup. Ct. Ohio. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 6 Ohio St. 3d 281, 452 N. E. 2d 1323. No. 83-5741. LEWIS v. UNITED STATES. C. A. 2d Cir. Cer tiorari denied. Reported below: 742 F. 2d 1443. No. 83-5754. PISCANIO v. PENNSYLVANIA BOARD OF PROBATION AND PAROLE ET AL. C. A. 3d Cir. Certiorari denied. No. 83-5758. FORBES v. AMERICAN TELEPHONE & TELEGRAPH ET AL. C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied. No. 83-473 (A-220). OROFINO v. UNITED STATES. C. A. 2d Cir. Application for bail and/or stay, addressed to JUSTICE WHITE and referred to the Court, denied. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 742 F. 2d 1443. No. 83-624. MASHPEE TRIBE ET AL. v. CLARK, SECRETARY OF THE INTERIOR, ET AL. C. A. 1st Cir. Motion of Center for Constitutional Rights et al. for leave to file a brief as amici curiae granted. Motion of petitioners to defer consideration of the petition for writ of certiorari denied. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 707 F. 2d 23. No. 83-5106. FIELDS v. WYRICK, WARDEN. C. A. 8th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 706 F. 2d 879. JUSTICE MARSHALL, dissenting. Last Term, this Court summarily reversed a judgment of the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit, which ruled that petitioner's 1975 Missouri rape conviction was based on an involuntary statement taken in violation of petitioner's Fifth Amendment rights. Wyrick v. Fields, 459 U. S. 42 (1982), rev'g 682 F. 2d 154. I dissented from that summary reversal because I do not believe this Court should decide unsettled questions of constitutional law without plenary review. 459 U. S., at 50. In my dissent, I noted that, even if petitioner's statement were voluntary under the Fifth Amendment, the interrogation that produced petitioner's statement might nevertheless have violated petitioner's Sixth Amendment right to counsel. Id., at 52-55. |