464 U. S. No. 82-2017. October 17, 1983 C. A. MARTIN V. MITCHELL, WARDEN, ET AL. 4th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 707 F. 2d 508. No. 83-132. STRUTHERS PATENT CORP. ET AL. v. NESTLE Co., INC. C. A. 3d Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 709 F. 2d 1495. No. 83-136. LAKE ERIE ALLIANCE FOR THE PROTECTION OF THE COASTAL CORRIDOR, INC., ET AL. v. UNITED STATES ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS ET AL. C. A. 3d Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 707 F. 2d 1392. No. 83-137. BERLITZ SCHOOLS OF LANGUAGES OF AMERICA, INC. v. BARTELT ET AL. C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 698 F. 2d 1003. No. 83-195. DELTA FARMS RECLAMATION DISTRICT NO. 2028 v. SUPERIOR COURT OF THE COUNTY OF SAN JOAQUIN (FERNANDEZ ET AL., REAL PARTIES IN INTEREST). Sup. Ct. Cal. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 33 Cal. 3d 699, 660 P. 2d 1168. No. 83-201. WEISS v. United StatES. C. A. 3d Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 714 F. 2d 126. No. 83-213. NEW YORK STATE ASSOCIATION FOR RETARDED CHILDREN, INC., ET AL. v. CAREY, GOVERNOR OF NEW YORK, ET AL. C. A. 2d Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 706 F. 2d 956. No. 83-225. VAN EMMERIK v. MONTANA DAKOTA UTILITIES Co. ET AL. Sup. Ct. S. D. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 332 N. W. 2d 279. No. 83-255. BENSON ET AL. v. MASSACHUSETTS. Sup. Jud. Ct. Mass. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 389 Mass. 473, 451 N. E. 2d 118. Re No. 83-259. EASTERN AIR LINES, INC. v. ATLANTIC RICHFIELD CO. Temp. Emerg. Ct. App. Certiorari denied. ported below: 712 F. 2d 1402. No. 83-265. CHAFFEE V. UNITED STATES. C. A. 1st Cir. Certiorari denied. Certiorari denied. Re No. 83-273. GALARDO, DBA TERM CON ELECTRONICS, ET AL. v. AMP INC. ET AL. C. A. 9th Cir. ported below: 709 F. 2d 1515. No. 83-285. KELLY v. UNITED STATES; and tiorari denied. Reported below: 708 F. 2d 121. KELLY v. UNITED STATES. C. A. 3d Cir. Cer C. A. 4th Cir. No. 83-288. BLANCK V. MCKEEN ET AL. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 707 F. 2d 817. No. 83-290. IVY v. NATCHITOCHES PARISH SCHOOL BOARD ET AL. Ct. App. La., 3d Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 428 So. 2d 1332. Certiorari No. 83-294. LINDSEY V. KELLY, SUPERINTENDENT OF THE CHICAGO PARK DISTRICT, ET AL. C. A. 7th Cir. denied. Reported below: 714 F. 2d 149. No. 83-301. ALASKA LUMBER & PULP Co., INC. v. REID BROTHERS LOGGING CO.; and No. 83-307. KETCHIKAN PULP Co. v. REID BROTHERS LOGGING CO. C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 699 F. 2d 1292. No. 83-339. PROVODA v. BELEN Board of EDUCATION, DBA BELEN CONSOLIDATED SCHOOLS, ET AL. C. A. 10th Cir. Certiorari denied. No. 83-363. CONNECTICUT v. UBALDI. Sup. Ct. Conn. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 190 Conn. 559, 462 A. 2d 1001. No. 83-376. YALKOWSKY ET AL. v. SHEDLER ET AL. C. A. 2d Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 742 F. 2d 1441. No. 83-433. YALKOWSKY v. NEALE ET AL. C. A. 2d Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 742 F. 2d 1441. RADUE v. UNITED STATES. C. A. 11th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 707 F. 2d 493. No. 83-470. No. 83-471. tiorari denied. No. 83-481. CRUZ v. UNITED STATES. C. A. 5th Cir. Cer- Certiorari denied. THOMPSON v. HEDRICK ET AL. C. A. 6th Cir. No. 83-5026. JACKSON v. BUTTERWORTH, SHERIFF OF BROWARD COUNTY, FLORIDA. C. A. 11th Cir. Certiorari denied. 464 U. S. No. 83-5028. LANDS. October 17, 1983 LEYCOCK V. GOVERNMENT OF THE VIRGIN IS C. A. 3d Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 709 F.2d 1491. No. 83-5054. MAXCY v. UNITED STATES. C. A. 11th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 710 F. 2d 838. No. 83-5060. ABBOTT v. ADAN, INDIVIDUALLY, AND AS AD MINISTRATRIX OF THE ESTATE OF ADAN. N. Y., 1st Jud. Dept. Certiorari denied. Certiorari denied. App. Div. 2d 1007, 462 N. Y. S. 2d 734. App. Div., Sup. Ct. No. 83-5062. JOHNSON v. HUBBARD ET AL. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 698 F. 2d 286. C. A. 6th Cir. HENRY V. OHIO. Ct. App. Ohio, Cuyahoga County. Certiorari denied. No. 83-5079. No. 83-5149. HAGLER v. UNITED STATES. C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 709 F. 2d 578. No. 83-5160. Certiorari denied. N. E. 2d 574. No. 83-5163. ZBOINSKI v. ILLINOIS. App. Ct. Ill., 1st Dist. WEEKS v. UNITED STATES. C. A. 11th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 702 F. 2d 1341. No. 83-5169. Certiorari denied. N. E. 2d 1243. No. 83-5170. Certiorari denied. N. E. 2d 370. ATENCIA v. ILLINOIS. App. Ct. Ill., 1st Dist. APRIL v. ILLINOIS. App. Ct. Ill., 1st Dist. No. 83-5173. TEJEDA-GALLEGOS v. UNITED STATES. C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 711 F. 2d 1067. No. 83-5181. BOOKER v. UNITED STATES. C. A. 8th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 706 F. 2d 860. No. 83-5206. Certiorari denied. LJUBAS v. UNITED STATES. C. A. 2d Cir. October 17, 1983 464 U. S. No. 83-5300. PARISIE v. GREER, WARDEN, MENARD CORREC TIONAL CENTER. C. A. 7th Cir. below: 705 F. 2d 882. No. 83-5303. HARVEY v. PINCUS ET AL. C. A. 3d Cir. Cer tiorari denied. Reported below: 716 F. 2d 890. No. 83-5314. THOMAS v. Cox, WARDEN. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 708 F. 2d 132. C. A. 4th Cir. No. 83-5319. EGGER v. PHILLIPS. C. A. 7th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 710 F. 2d 292. No. 83-5346. KODADEK V. UNITED STATES. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 720 F. 2d 668. No. 83-5350. Certiorari denied. No. 83-5362. Certiorari denied. SMITH V. NORTH CAROLINA. C. A. 3d Cir. C. A. 4th Cir. Reported below: 711 F. 2d 1051. BONNER v. UNITED STATES. C. A. 11th Cir. No. 83-5378. WALKER v. DUGGER, SUPERINTENDENT, FLORIDA STATE PRISON, ET AL. Sup. Ct. Fla. Reported below: 436 So. 2d 101. No. 83-5391. Certiorari denied. HEISE v. UNITED STATES. C. A. 6th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 709 F. 2d 449. No. 83-5398. FLEMMINGS v. NEW JERSEY. Super. Ct. N. J., App. Div. Certiorari denied. Sup. Ct. Ala. Certio No. 83-5421. FOWLER v. ALABAMA. rari denied. Reported below: 436 So. 2d 28. No. 83-5423. GREER v. UNITED STATES. Certiorari denied. C. A. 11th Cir. No. 83-5427. BERICK V. UNITED STATES. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 710 F. 2d 1035. No. 83-5435. C. A. 5th Cir. HERNANDEZ v. UNITED STATES. C. A. 11th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 697 F. 2d 1093. No. 83-5462. HARDIN v. UNITED STATES. C. A. 7th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 710 F. 2d 1231. No. 82-1718. RANDALL BOOK CORP. v. MARYLAND. Ct. Sp. App. Md. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 53 Md. App. 30, 452 A. 2d 187. JUSTICE BRENNAN, with whom JUSTICE MARSHALL joins, dissenting. Petitioner was charged with violating Md. Ann. Code, Art. 27, § 416D (1982), which makes a person or firm guilty of a misdemeanor "if it knowingly displays for advertising purposes any picture, photograph, drawing, sculpture or other visual representation or image of a person or portion of the human body that depicts sadomasochistic abuse, sexual conduct or sexual excitement, or any verbal description or narrative account of these activities or items." The Circuit Court for Baltimore County dismissed the charges, concluding that the statute was unconstitutionally vague and overbroad. On the State's appeal, the Maryland Court of Special Appeals reversed. 53 Md. App. 30, 452 A. 2d 187 (1982). The court, relying on Smiley v. State, 294 Md. 461, 450 A. 2d 909 (1982), concluded that the statute is constitutional and remanded to the trial court for further proceedings. In Smiley, the Maryland Court of Appeals construed the statute to prohibit only "obscene material," which this Court has held is unprotected by the First Amendment. See Miller v. California, 413 U. S. 15, 23 (1973). In my view, the statute is unconstitutional on its face, notwithstanding the state court's limiting construction. I continue to believe that "at least in the absence of distribution to juveniles or obtrusive exposure to unconsenting adults, the First and Fourteenth Amendments prohibit the State and Federal Governments from attempting wholly to suppress sexually oriented materials on the basis of their allegedly 'obscene' contents." Paris Adult Theatre I v. Slaton, 413 U. S. 49, 113 (1973) (BRENNAN, J., dissenting). See also New York v. Ferber, 458 U. S. 747, 775-777 (1982) (BRENNAN, J., concurring in judgment). Since a criminal trial of petitioner under this statute will in my view violate the Constitution of the United States, it is clear that "identifiable . . . constitutional polic[y]" will be "undermined by the continuation of the litigation in the state courts." See Flynt v. Ohio, 451 U. S. 619, 623 (1981) (Stewart, J., dissenting); id., at 623-624 (STEVENS, J., dissenting). Accordingly, the decision below is final within the meaning of 28 U. S. C. § 1257, and we |