 | 1917 - 2042 lapas
...for any common carrier, Its officers or agents, subject to this act to require or permit any employe subject to this act to be or remain on duty for a...than sixteen consecutive hours, and whenever any such employe of such common carrier shall have been continuously on duty for sixteen hours he shall be relieved... | |
 | 1917 - 1038 lapas
...hence .that service even for more than 17 hours was not, necessarily, a violation of 1 Sec. 2. That it shall be unlawful for any common carrier, its officers or agents, subject to this net to require or permit any employe subject to thla act to be or remain on duty for a longer period... | |
 | 1917 - 2042 lapas
...hence that service even for more than 17 hours was not, necessarily, a violation of i Sec. 2. That it shall be unlawful for any common carrier, Its officers or agents, subject to this net to require or permit any employe subject to this act to be or remain on duty for a longer period... | |
 | United States. Supreme Court - 1911 - 766 lapas
...held to mean persons actually engaged in or connected with the movement of any train. SEC. 2. That it shall be unlawful for any common carrier, its officers...agents, subject to this Act to require or permit any employe subject to this Act to be or remain on duty for a longer period than sixteen consecutive hours,... | |
 | 1919 - 1124 lapas
...actually engaged in or connected with the movement of any train." Section 2 is as follows : "That it shall be unlawful for any common carrier, its officers...agents, subject to this act to require or permit any employé subject to this act to be or remain on duty for a longer period than sixteen consecutive hours,... | |
 | Missouri. Supreme Court - 1922 - 858 lapas
...Inspection Act is as follows: "That from and after the first day of July, nineteen hundred and eleven, it shall be unlawful for any common carrier, its officers or agents, subject to this Act, to use any locomotive engine propelled by steam power in moving interstate or foreign traffic unless the... | |
 | 1918 - 728 lapas
...hence that service even for more than 17 hours was not, necessarily, a violation of 1 Sec. 2. That It shall be unlawful for any common carrier, Its officers or agents, subject to this net to require or permit any employe subject to this act to be or remain on duty for a longer period... | |
 | United States. Congress. House. Committee on Interstate and Foreign Commerce - 1906 - 174 lapas
...inserted, " or any such employee '' — that is to say, that from and after the 1st day of July, 190(i, it shall be unlawful for any common carrier, its officers...require or permit any employee subject to this act or any such employee to be or remain on duty for a longer period than sixteen consecutive hours. And... | |
 | United States. 59th Congress, 2d. session, 1906-1907 House. [from old catalog] - 1906 - 1006 lapas
...any common carrier, its officers, or agents subject to thin act to require or permit any employees subject to this act to be or remain on duty for a longer period than sixteen consecutive hours, etc. I want to suggest for your consideration, gentlemen, that the word ''knowingly" be used before... | |
 | 1906 - 936 lapas
...making it unlawful for any common carriers, its officers or agents, to require or permit any employe to remain on duty for a longer period than sixteen consecutive hours; and that he shall not again be required or permitted to work unless he has had at least ten consecutive... | |
| |
Act to be or remain on duty for a longer period than sixteen consecutive nours, and whenever any such employee of such common carrier shall have been continuously on duty for sixteen hours he shall be relieved and not required or permitted again to go... 
