Court of Customs and Patent Appeals Reports, 49. sējumsCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals, 1963 |
No grāmatas satura
1.–5. rezultāts no 100.
707. lappuse
... invention as claimed in the rejected claims is in essence the placement of the lens system of Carlton in the ... invention is not identically disclosed or described as set forth in section 102 of this title , " if the difference would ...
... invention as claimed in the rejected claims is in essence the placement of the lens system of Carlton in the ... invention is not identically disclosed or described as set forth in section 102 of this title , " if the difference would ...
713. lappuse
... invention , they might properly be subject to this criticism . The major question is whether such claims define his , or any , invention and this we think is a proper subject of inquiry by the examiner . Therefore under the above stated ...
... invention , they might properly be subject to this criticism . The major question is whether such claims define his , or any , invention and this we think is a proper subject of inquiry by the examiner . Therefore under the above stated ...
714. lappuse
... invention resided solely in the coupler , the court said : From our consideration of the record we agree with appellant that there is but a single invention here involved , but we disagree with the conclusion he would have us draw from ...
... invention resided solely in the coupler , the court said : From our consideration of the record we agree with appellant that there is but a single invention here involved , but we disagree with the conclusion he would have us draw from ...
716. lappuse
... invention . What this statutory requirement amounts to as the case law has developed it , is that applicant , with distinctness and particularity , shall define in " claims " that part of his disclosed invention which possesses the ...
... invention . What this statutory requirement amounts to as the case law has developed it , is that applicant , with distinctness and particularity , shall define in " claims " that part of his disclosed invention which possesses the ...
717. lappuse
... invention in terms of its being " inventive . " The statute makes no such requirement.1 2 The reason the invention before us is not patentable under the statute is that it is obvious , notwithstanding its difference from the prior art ...
... invention in terms of its being " inventive . " The statute makes no such requirement.1 2 The reason the invention before us is not patentable under the statute is that it is obvious , notwithstanding its difference from the prior art ...
Citi izdevumi - Skatīt visu
Bieži izmantoti vārdi un frāzes
affidavit affirmed alleged ammonia APPEAL from Patent appealed claims appellant appellant's appellee applicant's application aryl assignment Associate Judges Board of Appeals CCPA Chief Judge Clarence W Commissioner of Patents Court of Customs Customs and Patent cycloserine decision delivered the opinion device dextran disclosed disclosure District of Pennsylvania Dunhill election Emphasis examiner fact fibers filing date Hession invention issue Judge O'Connell Judge WILLIAM H Lanham Act likelihood of confusion mark MARTIN material means metal nated to participate neomycin obvious opposer opposer's Oral argument ordinary skill participate in place party Patent Appeals Patent Office place of Judge portion prior art provisions of Section purchasers pursuant to provisions recited record reduction to practice reference registration rejection of claims riboflavin SAKRETE section 2(d Senior District Judge Serial specification structure sudsy surface tion Title 28 United States Code United States Court United States Senior USPQ WORLEY
Populāri fragmenti
901. lappuse - A patent may not be obtained though the invention is not identically disclosed or described as set forth in section 102 of this title, if the differences between the subject matter sought to be patented and the prior art are such that the subject matter as a whole would have been obvious at the time the invention was made to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which said subject matter pertains.
1236. lappuse - The specification shall contain a written description of the invention, and of the manner and process of making and using it, in such full, clear, concise, and exact terms as to enable any person skilled in the art to which it pertains, or with which it is most nearly connected, to make and use the same, and shall set forth the best mode contemplated by the inventor of carrying out his invention.
1305. lappuse - The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the applicant regards as his invention.
919. lappuse - An element in a claim for a combination may be expressed as a means or step for performing a specified function without the recital of structure, material, or acts in support thereof, and such claim shall be construed to cover the corresponding structure, material, or acts described in the specification and equivalents thereof.
1166. lappuse - ... shall be assignable with the good will of the business in which the mark is used, or with that part of the goodwill of the business connected with the use of and symbolized by the mark...
845. lappuse - In making the foregoing determinations the court shall review the whole record or such portions thereof as may be cited by any party, and due account shall be taken of the rule of prejudicial error.
1301. lappuse - Court may appoint; and the revision shall be confined to the points set forth in the reasons of appeal. After hearing the case the Court shall return to the Commissioner a certificate of its proceedings and decision, which shall be entered of record in the Patent Office, and shall govern the further proceedings in the case.
1225. lappuse - The Commissioner may accept as prima facie evidence that the mark has become distinctive, as applied to the applicant's goods in commerce, proof of substantially exclusive and continuous use thereof as a mark by the applicant in commerce for the five years next preceding the date of the filing of the application for its registration.
845. lappuse - ... (e) SCOPE OF REVIEW. — So far as necessary to decision and where presented the reviewing court shall decide all relevant questions of law, interpret constitutional and statutory provisions, and determine the meaning or applicability of the terms of any agency action.
984. lappuse - ... notice with the Commissioner that he elects to have all further proceedings conducted as provided in section 146 of this title.