Lapas attēli
PDF
ePub

121

CONTENTS OF TECHNICAL APPENDIX (organized by exhibit supported)

SUMMARY EXHIBITS

123

125

123

123

A. No Economic Justification for an increase.
B. Price Per Tune is Down; Copyright Owners' Share is Up
C. Mechanical Royalties Have More Than Doubled

Mechanical Royalties Out pace Inflation and Median Family Income,

1963-1973
E. Mechanical Royalties Paid Per Released Tune Outpace Inflation

and Median Family Incone, 1963-1972
Payments to Copyright Owners Would Go Up $47 Million
Annual Cost to Consumers Could Go Up By $100 Million
Breakeven Point Higher Than Ever

125

124

124

H.

Rates Paid are Statutory Rate and Standard Variations

J. In 1974 as in 1963 Tunes were licensed at 24 or Standard

Variations
K. No Economic Justification for an increase

125

FULL STATEMENT EXHIBITS

1.

STATUTORY LICENSE ROYALTIES AND RECORD COMPANY PRICE: 1909 VS.

132

2 3. INC ME TO COPYRIGHT OWNERS FROM RECORDINSS, 1973 vs. 1963
4. STATUTORY MECHANICAL ROYALTIES PAID PER RELEASE OF RECORDED TINES

1763 . 2
ESTIMATED FINANCIAL STATISTICS AND INCOME STATEMENT FOR THE US.
REDON , 155-1914
STATUTORY !!INCE ROYALTIES PER TOP 150 LP ALBUMS IN 1973 AT VARIO S 15*
SAT. T *.115
FINANCIA! H TS OF perperd INCREASED VECHANICAL ROYALTIES ON
Mic ». INI ANDRERIT INISTRY, 191194
W MASTAL RYA!! 159 CMPARED TO RECORDING INDUSTRY PRE- TAX
PI:5 MKE

*** _ ; that An N THE UNITED STATES, T971-1994
IMRAT OF A COPYROOT BOTA:Y IN PEASE ON CONSUMER PRICE
10. C051 CASARS OF A je SAT.

MRY LICEYSE RATE

[merged small][ocr errors][merged small]

11 DGA? OF A CCPY! ) FTE INCREASE ON JUKE BOX OWNERS
12 PINS AS PLAYTV, TIME OF TP 159 LP ALBUM RECORDS
13 RE®3 MARS UNT SALES PER RELEASE AND BREAKFVEN POINTS (1972)
16 250: 985, 1969-1994

ONIZATION IN THE PHONOCRAPH RECORD INDUSTRY 1947-1970 16 0 7:17: ROYALTY RATES PAID ON COPYR:CHTS

# R o k CROS RELEASES BY TWO

163

167

SUNS IARY EXHIBITS

For data supporting material in the "Summary Statement", see the appropri. ate sections in the full statement (pp. 33-118) and in this Technical Appendix.

Exhibit A.. No Economic Justification for an increase

This exhibit summarizes the conclusions of the full statement. The basis for the finding that copyright owners' income has outpaced inflation is provided in Section 1.B. of the full statement, pp. 37 to 43. The impacts of an increased statutory rate are spelled out in Section II.A. to II.D. of the full statement, pp. 56 to 81.

Exhibit B .. Price Per Tune is Down; Copyright Owners' Share is up

This conclusion is based on Exhibit I, p. 36. it should be noted that the price per tune received by record companies has declined in current dollars since 1909, even though today's product is far superior in quality.

Exhibit C - Mechanical Royalties Have More Than Doubled

The data in this exhibit are based upon Exhibit 3 in the main report, p. 59. The source of the figures is CRI's financial survey of recording companies, which is explained in detail later in this appendix under "Exhibit

[ocr errors][merged small]

These data are also based on Exhibit s in the main report, p. 39. Data pertaining to the Consumer Price Index and Median Family Income are from the Statistical Attract of the lited States,

Exhibit E -- Mechanica! Rovalties Paid Per Released Twe
3.e .asion 11
M
i ne

;

These data are based upon the analysis in Exhibit 4 of the sain report,

p. 43. The assumptions bety and the exhibit are discussed later in this technic** apperdix under "Exitit 2".

[merged small][ocr errors][merged small]

Tel.-4.4 11 e aired on pages 56-60; the underlying data are to be found u .1.'16 ", which are discussed in this appendix Suffice it to say here But the $€* aiiion figure does not assume that all licenses would be paid at

It is based on the study finding that the existing rate structure, with $tendard disputs off the statutory rate, would prevail .. but at a higher 3.8*** for i! rates This study finding is explained in Section 11. E. of the t... 1'' t

Note that the increase in sechanical royalties paid would be more than the 1 .1.bered by raising the rat. from 2 to 5¢ because of the effect of the opposed playing time provision in Sec. 115 of H.R. 2223. (See Exhibit 6.)

[ocr errors][ocr errors]

Ciculation of the increase -- more precisely $97 6 million -- is shown Ha e.dit 19, page " Note that the increase to Consumers is consiserably

"flas $4' miilium increase to recording companies. The logic for this 3* *7 4.*•$ ls 1919 emaisa! Aspendix under Exhibi: 9.

?r*.**Breate er .fm? !!** anter Nese data cane directiy frue Exhibit is of the sain written report, p. 74 ***** of that eu. 11, y conducted by Cambridge Research Institute

:), l. 410.Jsod iater in this appendix urder "Exhibit 130.

TIL . Po ! are ran

d o!g

arla'! 99 *** per ***25*are computed directly from Einibit aI. p 118, which is Barin.twil later in this technical Appenix.

[ocr errors][merged small][ocr errors]

125

licenses, were paid at rates other than standard variations. This amounts to 0.81 of the tunes sampled.

The left-hand side of Exhibit J is taken from the 1965 Statement of John Desmond Glover on H.R. 4347 Section 113 (c) (2).

Exhibit K - No Economic Justification for an increase

This exhibit restates the conclusions of Exhibit A.

This concludes the section of the Technical Appendix covering the Summary exhibits.

is conectates the section of the technical asendis coverine the comm

« iepriekšējāTurpināt »