| United States. Supreme Court - 1912 - 840 lapas
...Mr. Justice Harlan, speaking for this court in Southern Pacific R. Co. v. United States, 168 US 1,48: "That a right, question or fact distinctly put in...subsequent suit between the same parties or their privies." Sound reason, as we think, constrains us to deny to a certificate of naturalization, procured ex parte... | |
| 1920 - 496 lapas
...Lindsay-Strathmore Irr. Dlst. v. Superior Court of Tulare County, Cal., 187 Pac. 1056. 54. Res Judicata. — A fact distinctly put In issue and directly determined...disputed in a subsequent suit between the same parties, even if the second suit is for a different cause of action. — Lyons v. Empire Fuel Co., MSCCA, 262... | |
| 1900 - 2044 lapas
...UB, 168 US 1-48, 18 Snp. Ct. 27, it is said that: "The general principle announced In numerous eases Is that a right, question, or fact distinctly put...ground of recovery, cannot be disputed In a subsequent salt between the same parties or their privies: and, even if the second suit le for a different cause... | |
| 1944 - 1218 lapas
[ Atvainojiet, šīs lappuses saturs ir ierobežots. ] | |
| 1944 - 1242 lapas
[ Atvainojiet, šīs lappuses saturs ir ierobežots. ] | |
| 1917 - 2042 lapas
...reference to which the adjudications in both extend, rrom this has arisen the rule of the Supreme Court that: "A right, question or fact, distinctly put In...competent jurisdiction, as a ground of recovery, cannot tie disputed in a subsequent suit between the same parties or their privies ; and even if the second... | |
| 1938 - 1202 lapas
[ Atvainojiet, šīs lappuses saturs ir ierobežots. ] | |
| 1918 - 2060 lapas
[ Atvainojiet, šīs lappuses saturs ir ierobežots. ] | |
| 1904 - 906 lapas
...subject of res judioata are reviewed by Mr. Justice Harían, and the general doctrine thus stated: "A right, question, or fact distinctly put in issue...disputed in a subsequent suit between the same parties or fheir privies; and even if the second suit is for 'a different cause of action, the right, question,... | |
| United States. Supreme Court, John Chandler Bancroft Davis, Henry Putzel, Henry C. Lind, Frank D. Wagner - 1912 - 838 lapas
...Mr. Justice Harlan, speaking for this court in Southern Pacific R. Co. v. United States, 168 US 1,48: "That a right, question or fact distinctly put in...disputed in a subsequent suit between the same parties or then- privies." Sound reason, as we think, constrains us to deny to a certificate of naturalization,... | |
| |