It is emphatically the province and duty of the judicial department to say what the law is. Those who apply the rule to particular cases must of necessity expound and interpret that rule. If two laws conflict with each other, the courts must decide on... Elgar Encyclopedia of Comparative Law - 192. lappuselaboja - 2006 - 821 lapasIerobežota priekšskatīšana - Par šo grāmatu
| Horace Binney, Pennsylvania. Supreme Court - 1809 - 676 lapas
...180. " It is emphatically the province and duty of the judi" cial department to say what the law is. Those who apply the " rule to particular cases, must of necessity expound and inter•' pret that rule. If two laws conflict with each other, the courts " must decide on the operation... | |
| United States. Supreme Court, William Cranch - 1812 - 486 lapas
...consideration. It is emphatically the province and duty of the judicial department to say what the law is. Those who apply the rule to particular cases, must...other, the courts must decide on the operation of each. 178 *So if a law be in opposition to the constitution; if both the law and the constitution apply to... | |
| William Wirt - 1826 - 690 lapas
...void. 'It is emphatically the province and duty of the judicial department to say what the law is. Those who apply the rule to particular cases, must...other, the courts must decide on the operation of each. ' So if a law be in opposition to the constitution ; if both the law and the constitution apply to... | |
| Robert Walsh - 1827 - 674 lapas
...consideration. " It is emphatically the province and duty of the judicial department to say what the law is. Those who apply the rule to particular cases, must,...other, the courts must decide on the operation of each. So, if a law be in opposition to tin' Constitution ; if both the law and the Constitution apply to... | |
| William Sullivan - 1830 - 72 lapas
...void. 'It is emphatically the province and duty of the judicial department to say what the law is. Those who apply the rule to particular cases, must...other, the courts must decide on the operation of each. ' So if a law be in opposition to the constitution; if both the law and the constitution apply to a... | |
| Joseph Story - 1833 - 800 lapas
...consideration. "It is emphatically the province and duty of the judicial department to say, what the law is. Those, who apply the rule to particular cases, must...other, the courts must decide on the operation of each. So if a law be in opposition to the constitution ; if both the law and the constitution apply to a... | |
| John Marshall - 1839 - 762 lapas
...consideration. jit is emphatically the province and duty j>f the judicial department to say what the law is. Those who apply the rule to particular cases must...and interpret that rule. If two laws conflict with eacii other, the courts must decide on the operation of each.> So.jif a law be in opposition to the... | |
| Michigan. Supreme Court, Randolph Manning, George C. Gibbs, Thomas McIntyre Cooley, Elijah W. Meddaugh, William Jennison, Hovey K. Clarke, Hoyt Post, Henry Allen Chaney, William Dudley Fuller, John Adams Brooks, Marquis B. Eaton, Herschel Bouton Lazell, James M. Reasoner, Richard W. Cooper - 1916 - 830 lapas
...terse language of Chief Justice Marshall in Marbury v. Madison, I Cranch, 137-178, is appropriate here: "If two laws conflict with each other, the courts must decide on the operation of each. So if a law be in opposition to the Constitution, if both the law and the Constitution apply to a particular... | |
| George Van Santvoord - 1854 - 550 lapas
...follows : "It is emphatically the province and duty of the judicial department to say what the law is. Those who apply the rule to particular cases must...that rule. If two laws conflict with each other, the court must decide on the operation of each. So if a law be in opposition to the Constitution," &c.,... | |
| George Van Santvoord - 1854 - 554 lapas
...emphatically the province and duty of the jndicial department to say what the law is. Those who apply the rale to particular cases must of necessity expound and...that rule. If two laws conflict with each other, the court must decide on the operation of each. So if a law be in opposition to the Constitution," &c.,... | |
| |