Lapas attēli
PDF
ePub

contain the complete rulings constituting the body of precedent relied on in settling disputed points. While most of these rulings have not been tested in the courts, one may, nevertheless, learn from them the point of view which the Department will adopt should similar situations again arise.

In the Revenue Act of 1926, one will find an administration-made law, accepted by both houses of Congress almost without debate. "Tax simplification," widely heralded as an accomplishment of the last session, meant, actually, no more than lowered rates of taxes applicable to individuals and an increase in corporate taxes. No rules for the computation of taxable income were simplified; many were further complicated, and a few new ones were added. Politics may well dictate the rates of tax, but the orderly development of income tax theory relating to the computation of taxable income should be in the hands of a commission of financial experts who are capable of following business conditions and recommending to Congress needed changes in the law. The instalment sales provision in the Revenue Act of 1926, commendable though its general purpose may be, gives characteristic and striking proof of the lack of expert advice which Congress so badly needs. Is it possible that the highly technical features of recent revenue acts have disqualified its members as originators of income tax legislation?

Thanks are due those who have sent the author criticisms of the previous editions.

Chicago, Illinois, January 20, 1927.

ERIC L. KOHLER

[blocks in formation]

This table is intended as an index for those who wish to read farther into income tax cases. It will be observed that 14 volumes of cases have
been published thus far. The cases since January 1, 1926, referred to in this book, are contained in the weekly "Internal Revenue Bulletins," obtain-
able from the Superintendent of Documents, Government Printing Office, at five cents each, or at the subscription price of $2 per annum.

« iepriekšējāTurpināt »