In Defense of Negativity: Attack Ads in Presidential Campaigns

Pirmais vāks
University of Chicago Press, 2008. gada 29. jūl. - 218 lappuses
Americans tend to see negative campaign ads as just that: negative. Pundits, journalists, voters, and scholars frequently complain that such ads undermine elections and even democratic government itself. But John G. Geer here takes the opposite stance, arguing that when political candidates attack each other, raising doubts about each other’s views and qualifications, voters—and the democratic process—benefit.

In Defense of Negativity, Geer’s study of negative advertising in presidential campaigns from 1960 to 2004, asserts that the proliferating attack ads are far more likely than positive ads to focus on salient political issues, rather than politicians’ personal characteristics. Accordingly, the ads enrich the democratic process, providing voters with relevant and substantial information before they head to the polls.

An important and timely contribution to American political discourse, In Defense of Negativity concludes that if we want campaigns to grapple with relevant issues and address real problems, negative ads just might be the solution.
 

Lietotāju komentāri - Rakstīt atsauksmi

Ierastajās vietās neesam atraduši nevienu atsauksmi.

Saturs

An Introduction
1
2 Assessing Negativity
20
3 The Information Environment and Negativity
42
4 Evaluating Character Attacks
64
5 Evaluating the Content of Negative and Positive Issue Appeals
85
6 Dragging the Truth into the Gutter? The News Media Negativity and the 1988 Campaign
111
7 Negativity Democracy and the Political System
136
Appendix
163
Notes
167
References
185
Index
195
Autortiesības

Citi izdevumi - Skatīt visu

Bieži izmantoti vārdi un frāzes

Par autoru (2008)

John G. Geer is professor of political science at Vanderbilt University and the editor of the Journal of Politics, the editor of Politicians and Party Politics, and the author of Nominating Presidents: An Evaluation of Voters and Primaries and From Tea Leaves to Opinion Polls: Politicians, Information, and Leadership.

Bibliogrāfiskā informācija