The Federal Reporter, 75. sējumsWest Publishing Company, 1880 Includes cases argued and determined in the District Courts of the United States and, Mar./May 1880-Oct./Nov. 1912, the Circuit Courts of the United States; Sept./Dec. 1891-Sept./Nov. 1924, the Circuit Courts of Appeals of the United States; Aug./Oct. 1911-Jan./Feb. 1914, the Commerce Court of the United States; Sept./Oct. 1919-Sept./Nov. 1924, the Court of Appeals of the District of Columbia. |
No grāmatas satura
1.3. rezultāts no 86.
389. lappuse
... prior art , Brodrick's invention was only a car- rying forward or more extended application of the original in- vention , so as to obtain higher finish , greater beauty of surface , and increase in commercial value , thus bringing the ...
... prior art , Brodrick's invention was only a car- rying forward or more extended application of the original in- vention , so as to obtain higher finish , greater beauty of surface , and increase in commercial value , thus bringing the ...
584. lappuse
... prior use was given complainants in defendant's answer , a consid- eration of the prior state of the art is not permissible , and all evi- dence in the record relating thereto should be expunged . The an thorities do not seem to support ...
... prior use was given complainants in defendant's answer , a consid- eration of the prior state of the art is not permissible , and all evi- dence in the record relating thereto should be expunged . The an thorities do not seem to support ...
682. lappuse
in view of the prior art , did not involve invention ; and , second , that the claim is for an unpatentable aggregation . Upon a careful examination of the many prior patents put in evi- dence for the defense , I do not find that any ...
in view of the prior art , did not involve invention ; and , second , that the claim is for an unpatentable aggregation . Upon a careful examination of the many prior patents put in evi- dence for the defense , I do not find that any ...
Citi izdevumi - Skatīt visu
Bieži izmantoti vārdi un frāzes
action alleged amendment amount appellees application assignment authority Beattyville bill of lading bonds cause Central Trust Company certificates charge charter circuit court Circuit Judge claim complainant complainant's contract corporation court of equity creditors declared decree deed defendant defendant's demurrer District Judge domicile entitled equity error evidence execution fact filed follows Garcelon grant guaranty held infringement injunction insolvent Insurance interest invention issued judgment June jurisdiction jury Kentucky land letters patent liability libel lien Longworth family machine Marietta master ment mineral wool mortgage National Bank operation owner paid parties payment person petition Pitkin county plaintiff plaintiff in error prior purpose question Railroad Co Railroad Company receiver referred respondent rule secured statute stockholders suit supreme court testimony thereof tion Trust Company United vessel witness