The Right to Own Property: Hearing Before the Committee on the Judiciary, United States Senate, One Hundred Fourth Congress, First Session, on S. 605, a Bill to Establish a Uniform and More Efficient Federal Process for Protecting Property Owners' Rights Guaranteed by the Fifth Amendment, Washington, DC; Salt Lake City, UT; and Washington, DC, April 6, July 3, and October 18, 1995, 4. sējumsU.S. Government Printing Office, 1996 - 402 lappuses |
No grāmatas satura
1.–5. rezultāts no 91.
2. lappuse
... thank you for coming. The Chairman. We are hopeful that Senator Dole and Senator Gramm will be here within the near future, but we will begin our hearing by calling upon Ms. Nellie Edwards. We are delighted to have you here as my fellow ...
... thank you for coming. The Chairman. We are hopeful that Senator Dole and Senator Gramm will be here within the near future, but we will begin our hearing by calling upon Ms. Nellie Edwards. We are delighted to have you here as my fellow ...
1. lappuse
... Thanks to the wetland designation , the city was able to pay a mere $ 600 per acre for her land , land which was worth at least $ 7,500 per acre way back in 1973 . The Omnibus Property Rights Act contains several features which combine ...
... Thanks to the wetland designation , the city was able to pay a mere $ 600 per acre for her land , land which was worth at least $ 7,500 per acre way back in 1973 . The Omnibus Property Rights Act contains several features which combine ...
2. lappuse
... thank you for coming . The CHAIRMAN . We are hopeful that Senator Dole and Senator Gramm will be here within the near future , but we will begin our hearing by calling upon Ms. Nellie Edwards . We are delighted to have you here as my ...
... thank you for coming . The CHAIRMAN . We are hopeful that Senator Dole and Senator Gramm will be here within the near future , but we will begin our hearing by calling upon Ms. Nellie Edwards . We are delighted to have you here as my ...
4. lappuse
... thank you . That is a very , very touching and interesting story . How many acres were involved ? Ms. EDWARDS . Thirty - five and one - half acres . The CHAIRMAN . Thirty - five and one - half , and how much did you get per acre ? Ms ...
... thank you . That is a very , very touching and interesting story . How many acres were involved ? Ms. EDWARDS . Thirty - five and one - half acres . The CHAIRMAN . Thirty - five and one - half , and how much did you get per acre ? Ms ...
5. lappuse
... thank you for your testimony . Ms. EDWARDS . Thank you . The privilege is mine . Senator KYL . Mr. Chairman ? The CHAIRMAN . Excuse me . I didn't notice you , Senator Kyl . Senator KYL . I came in the front rather than the back door ...
... thank you for your testimony . Ms. EDWARDS . Thank you . The privilege is mine . Senator KYL . Mr. Chairman ? The CHAIRMAN . Excuse me . I didn't notice you , Senator Kyl . Senator KYL . I came in the front rather than the back door ...
Citi izdevumi - Skatīt visu
Bieži izmantoti vārdi un frāzes
33 percent acres ADLER administrative agency action American apply CHAIRMAN City Clean Water Act Committee common law Congress Constitution contract costs County Court of Federal create decision economic Endangered Species Act environment erty example farm farmers Federal Claims Federal Government Fifth Amendment going government regulation habitat harm homeowners impact individual interest issue jurisdiction Justice landowners legislation litigation Lucas LUDWISZEWSKI MARZULLA ment million nuisance exception nuisance law Omnibus Property Rights pensation permit pollution private property owners private property rights problems prop property owners Property Rights Act property values proposed public rights question recognized regulatory takings require compensation restrictions result safety SCHMIDT Section 404 Senator BIDEN Senator DEWINE Senator THURMOND standard statute Supreme Court Takings Clause Thank tion Title U.S. SENATOR U.S. Supreme Court Utah Utah County Utah Lake water rights wetlands WILKINS
Populāri fragmenti
54. lappuse - To the extent necessary to decision and when presented, the reviewing court shall decide all relevant questions of law, interpret constitutional and statutory provisions, and determine the meaning or applicability of the terms of an agency action.
166. lappuse - Amendment's guarantee [isj designed to bar Government from forcing some people alone to bear public burdens which, in all fairness and justice, should be borne by the public as a whole,
54. lappuse - ... a) arbitrary, capricious, an abuse of discretion, or otherwise not in accordance with law; b) contrary to constitutional right, power, privilege, or immunity; c) in excess of statutory jurisdiction, authority, or limitations, or short of statutory right...
54. lappuse - ... unwarranted by the facts to the extent that the facts are subject to trial de novo by the reviewing court. In making the foregoing determinations the court shall review the whole record or such portions thereof as may be cited by any party, and due account shall be taken of the rule of prejudicial error.
65. lappuse - Government hardly could go on if to some extent values incident to property could not be diminished without paying for every such change in the general law. As long recognized, some values are enjoyed under an implied limitation and must yield to the police power. But obviously the implied limitation must have its limits, or the contract and due process clauses are gone.
275. lappuse - Interior, in carrying out the provisions of this act, shall proceed in conformity with such laws, and nothing herein shall in any way affect any right of any State or of the Federal Government or of any landowner, appropriator, or user of water in, to, or from any interstate stream or the waters thereof...
60. lappuse - Court, quite simply, has been unable to develop any "set formula" for determining when "justice and fairness" require that economic injuries caused by public action be compensated by the government, rather than remain disproportionately concentrated on a few persons.
388. lappuse - Penn Central Transp. Co. v. City of New York, 438 US 104 (1978) and Benenson v.
191. lappuse - There is perhaps no more impenetrable jungle in the entire law than that which surrounds the word 'nuisance.
7. lappuse - Court has described the purpose of this clause in the following terms; "[The] Fifth Amendment's guarantee that private property shall not be taken for a public use without just compensation was designed to bar Government from forcing some people alone to bear public burdens which, in all fairness and justice, should be borne by the public as a whole.