Broadcast Regulation and Station Ownership: Hearing Before the Subcommittee on Telecommunications, Consumer Protection, and Finance of the Committee on Energy and Commerce, House of Representatives, Ninety-eighth Congress, Second Session, on H.R. 6122 ... H.R. 6134 ... September 19, 1984, 4. sējums

Pirmais vāks

No grāmatas satura

Atlasītās lappuses

Citi izdevumi - Skatīt visu

Bieži izmantoti vārdi un frāzes

Populāri fragmenti

91. lappuse - It is the right of the viewers and listeners, not the right of the broadcasters, which is paramount.
74. lappuse - That no corporation engaged in commerce shall acquire, directly or indirectly, the whole or any part of the stock or other share capital and no corporation subject to the jurisdiction of the Federal Trade Commission shall acquire the whole or any part of the assets of another corporation engaged also in commerce, where in any line of commerce...
88. lappuse - Simply stated, the fundamental purpose of this facet of the multiple ownership rules is to promote diversification of ownership in order to maximize diversification of program and service viewpoints as well as to prevent any undue concentration of economic power contrary to the public interest.
96. lappuse - Amendment rests on the assumption that the widest possible dissemination of information from diverse and antagonistic sources is essential to the welfare of the public, that a free press is a condition of a free society.
73. lappuse - ... (1) such party directly or indirectly owns, operates, or controls another television broadcast station which serves substantially the same area; or (2) such party, or any stockholder, officer, or director of such party, directly or indirectly owns, operates, controls, or has any interest in, or is an officer or director of any other television broadcast station If the grant of such license would result in a concentration of control of television broadcasting in a manner inconsistent with public...
73. lappuse - ... and the extent of other competitive service to the areas in question. The Commission, however, will in any event consider that there would be such a concentration of control contrary to the public interest, convenience or necessity for any party or any of its stockholders, officers or directors to have a direct or indirect interest in, or be stockholders, officers, or directors of, more than seven television broadcast stations, no more than five of which may be in the VHF band.
74. lappuse - ... where in any line of commerce or in any activity affecting commerce in any section of the country, the effect of such acquisition may be substantially to lessen competition, or to tend to create a monopoly.
88. lappuse - Act was the desire to effectuate the policy against the monopolization of broadcast facilities and the preservation of our broadcasting system on a free competitive basis. See Federal Communications Commission v. Sanders Brothers Radio Station, 309 US 470. This Commission has consistently adhered to the principle of "diversification* in order to implement the Congressional policy against monopoly and in order to preserve competition.
75. lappuse - Act, is to cope with monopolistic tendencies in their incipiency and well before they have attained such effects as would justify a Sherman Act proceeding.
88. lappuse - ... than the operation of broadcast stations by a small and limited group of licensees. The vitality of our system of broadcasting depends in large part on the introduction into this field of licensees who are prepared and qualified to serve the varied and divergent needs of the public for radio service. Simply stated, the fundamental purpose of this facet of the multiple ownership...

Bibliogrāfiskā informācija