Shama Prosad v. Huro Prosad Shaikh Subhan Ali v. Shaikh Sufdar Ali ... ... Shibdass Bandapadhya v. Bamandass Mukhapa-18 BL R., 237 dhya ... Sreenath Chatterjea v. Koylash Chunder Chatter ... } 21 21 W. R., 248 ... 6 27 ... 12 W. R.,1 F.B.3 B. L. R. 31, F. B. 53 574 Srimati Jaykali Debi v. Sibnath Chatterjea 2 B. L. R., O. C., 2 Ch. D., 101 Spud Yusuf Ali Khan v. Mussamut Azumtoo. Spud Enayet Hossein v. Muddun Moonee Sha hoo ... Examination of accused-Record of questions asked-Omission of Magistrate. The omission of a Magistrate to have recorded in the vernacular the questions asked in the examination of the accused person does not necessarily render that examination inadmissible as evidence. For Appellant: Baboo Joy Gobind Shome. For Government: Baboo Jugdanund Mookerjee (junior Government THIS case was referred for the opinion of the Full Bench by MACPHERSON and BIRCH, J.J., in the following terms :— In this case the prisoner has been convicted of murder, the offence having been committed on the 10th of September last. He was committed by Mr. Luttman-Johnson, the Magistrate of Cachar, for trial before the Sessions Court. In the course of the enquiry preliminary to commitment, the prisoner was twice examined by the Magistrate. If the statements made by him on the occasion of these examinations are admissible in evidence, the conviction can be supported; but if 1877 March 26. |