Legal Services Corporation Improvement Act: Hearing Before the Subcommittee on Commercial and Administrative Law of the Committee on the Judiciary, House of Representatives, One Hundred Ninth Congress, Second Session, on H.R. 6101, September 26, 2006, 4. sējumsU.S. Government Printing Office, 2007 - 142 lappuses |
No grāmatas satura
1.5. rezultāts no 29.
1. lappuse
... meeting this afternoon to consider H.R. 6101 , the " Legal Services Corporation Improvement Act , " a bill I introduced in response to a disturbing pattern of events that have come to the Subcommittee's attention . I will keep my ...
... meeting this afternoon to consider H.R. 6101 , the " Legal Services Corporation Improvement Act , " a bill I introduced in response to a disturbing pattern of events that have come to the Subcommittee's attention . I will keep my ...
2. lappuse
... meeting this after- noon to consider H.R. 6101 , the " Legal Services Corporation Improvement Act , " a bill I introduced in response to a disturbing pattern of events that have come to our attention . I will keep my opening remarks ...
... meeting this after- noon to consider H.R. 6101 , the " Legal Services Corporation Improvement Act , " a bill I introduced in response to a disturbing pattern of events that have come to our attention . I will keep my opening remarks ...
10. lappuse
... meeting with the LSC_Chairman and Senate appropriations staff to share a Con- gressional perspective about the role of an Inspector General and how an agency should interact with its Inspector General . I offered to arrange more such ...
... meeting with the LSC_Chairman and Senate appropriations staff to share a Con- gressional perspective about the role of an Inspector General and how an agency should interact with its Inspector General . I offered to arrange more such ...
27. lappuse
... meeting in January , Board members said various things . Do you recall that discussion of Mr. West's ac- tivity in that Board meeting ? It would have been , I think , in Janu- ary . Mr. STRICKLAND . I do recall that . Mr. CANNON . Is ...
... meeting in January , Board members said various things . Do you recall that discussion of Mr. West's ac- tivity in that Board meeting ? It would have been , I think , in Janu- ary . Mr. STRICKLAND . I do recall that . Mr. CANNON . Is ...
28. lappuse
... meeting that we are talking about is the meeting in January of this year . Mr. STRICKLAND . Right . The meeting in January- Mr. CANNON . And that may have been past material , because we had had the Georgetown material already done ...
... meeting that we are talking about is the meeting in January of this year . Mr. STRICKLAND . Right . The meeting in January- Mr. CANNON . And that may have been past material , because we had had the Georgetown material already done ...
Citi izdevumi - Skatīt visu
Bieži izmantoti vārdi un frāzes
1101 Sixteenth Street Administration agency head allegations annual performance evaluation appointed appropriate authority bill Board meeting Board members Board of Directors BURLING LLP CANNON CHAIRMAN BEVIER CHRIS CANNON cite concerns CONFIDENTIAL Executive Session Congressional Coogan Mem Coogan memorandum counsel COVINGTON & BURLING discussion Diversified Reporting Services employee Executive Session Transcript fire GARTEN gentleman going IG Act IG's performance IG's report Inspector issue John Danforth Kirt West Legal Services Corporation legislation LSC Board LSC IG LSC management LSC's McKay MEITES Nuclear Regulatory Commission NW Second Floor OIG's oversight performance appraisal Performance Reviews Committee Polgar President problems Quatrevaux question regarding remove response retaliation role Sarbanes-Oxley Act Second Floor Washington Senate Services Corporation Improvement Sharing/Dissemination spector staff statutory STRICKLAND supermajority supervision talking Thank things U.S. Postal Service U.S. Secret Service understand WATT Williams
Populāri fragmenti
68. lappuse - Whoever corruptly or by threats or force, or by any threatening letter or communication...
53. lappuse - Neither the head of the establishment nor the officer next in rank below such head shall prevent or prohibit the Inspector General from initiating, carrying out, or completing any audit or investigation, or from issuing any subpoena during the course of any audit or investigation.
62. lappuse - General becomes aware of particularly serious or flagrant problems, abuses, or deficiencies relating to the administration of programs and operations of such establishment.
52. lappuse - Each Inspector General shall report to and be under the general supervision of the head of the establishment involved...
68. lappuse - Whoever knowingly, with the intent to retaliate, takes any action harmful to any person, including interference with the lawful employment or livelihood of any person, for providing to a law enforcement officer any truthful information relating to the commission or possible commission of any Federal offense, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than 10 years, or both.
59. lappuse - General shall (1) investigate all matters related to the receipt, disbursement, and use of public money; (2) estimate the cost to the United States Government of complying with each restriction on expenditures of a specific appropriation...
60. lappuse - anyone, including the agency head," can contact the Integrity Committee of the President's Council on Integrity and Efficiency ("PCIE") to "raise concerns and request a review.
21. lappuse - That is not what I am talking about. I am talking about, for example, the Mad River, or the Naugatuck River, which are not navigable.
59. lappuse - GAO supports congressional oversight by: evaluating how well Government policies and programs are working; auditing Agency operations to determine whether Federal funds are being spent efficiently, effectively, and appropriately; investigating allegation of illegal and improper activities; and issuing legal decisions and opinions.
59. lappuse - GAO continues to support Congressional oversight of executive branch agencies, such as by evaluating how well government policies and programs are working; auditing agency operations to determine whether federal funds are being spent efficiently and appropriately; investigating allegations of illegal and improper activities; and issuing legal decisions and opinions. It is true that GAO may respond to Congressional requests for information. However, this does not mean that GAO would be specifically...