Legal Services Corporation Improvement Act: Hearing Before the Subcommittee on Commercial and Administrative Law of the Committee on the Judiciary, House of Representatives, One Hundred Ninth Congress, Second Session, on H.R. 6101, September 26, 2006, 4. sējumsU.S. Government Printing Office, 2007 - 142 lappuses |
No grāmatas satura
1.–5. rezultāts no 33.
4. lappuse
... fact than that required to remove a Board member . While any IG must be permitted to do his or her job with- out interference , the normal give and take of internal orders and investigations does not rise to the level of obstruction ...
... fact than that required to remove a Board member . While any IG must be permitted to do his or her job with- out interference , the normal give and take of internal orders and investigations does not rise to the level of obstruction ...
6. lappuse
... fact that your written statements will be included in the hearing record , I request that you limit your oral remarks to 5 minutes . Ac- cordingly , please feel free to summarize or highlight the salient points of your testimony . You ...
... fact that your written statements will be included in the hearing record , I request that you limit your oral remarks to 5 minutes . Ac- cordingly , please feel free to summarize or highlight the salient points of your testimony . You ...
10. lappuse
... fact that the Board " rejected " this report was an early indication that the Board did not fully comprehend the role of an Inspector General . I have taken affirmative steps to help familiarize the Board with what an inde- pendent ...
... fact that the Board " rejected " this report was an early indication that the Board did not fully comprehend the role of an Inspector General . I have taken affirmative steps to help familiarize the Board with what an inde- pendent ...
19. lappuse
... fact that they are officers of the corporation . Mr. WATT . And when the Board found out about that , would they have the authority to tell the Director that that is - that was some- thing that they did not want or want ? Mr. WEST ...
... fact that they are officers of the corporation . Mr. WATT . And when the Board found out about that , would they have the authority to tell the Director that that is - that was some- thing that they did not want or want ? Mr. WEST ...
21. lappuse
... fact , I might just ask Mr. Strickland , is it true that Ms. Barnett told the treasurer or the general counsel not to talk to members of the Board ? Mr. STRICKLAND . The way Ms. Barnett has organized the oper- ation , we have a chief ...
... fact , I might just ask Mr. Strickland , is it true that Ms. Barnett told the treasurer or the general counsel not to talk to members of the Board ? Mr. STRICKLAND . The way Ms. Barnett has organized the oper- ation , we have a chief ...
Citi izdevumi - Skatīt visu
Bieži izmantoti vārdi un frāzes
1101 Sixteenth Street agency head allegations annual performance evaluation appointed appropriate bill Board meeting Board members Board of Directors BURLING LLP CANNON CHAIRMAN BEVIER CHAIRMAN STRICKLAND CHRIS CANNON cite concerns CONFIDENTIAL Executive Session Congress Congressional Coogan Mem Coogan memorandum COVINGTON & BURLING Designated Federal Entities discussion Diversified Reporting Services employee Executive Session Transcript fire Frank GARTEN gentleman give going hearing IG Act IG's performance issue Legal Services Corporation look LSC Board LSC IG LSC management LSC's MCKAY MEITES NASA NW Second Floor OIG's Okay oversight performance appraisal Performance Reviews Committee Polgar Postal Service President problems Quatrevaux question regarding relevant remove response retaliation role Sarbanes-Oxley Act Second Floor Washington Senate Session Transcript Sharing/Dissemination staff statement statutory Subcommittee supervision talk tell Thank things U.S. Postal Service understand WATT Williams
Populāri fragmenti
68. lappuse - Whoever corruptly or by threats or force, or by any threatening letter or communication...
53. lappuse - Neither the head of the establishment nor the officer next in rank below such head shall prevent or prohibit the Inspector General from initiating, carrying out, or completing any audit or investigation, or from issuing any subpoena during the course of any audit or investigation.
62. lappuse - General becomes aware of particularly serious or flagrant problems, abuses, or deficiencies relating to the administration of programs and operations of such establishment.
52. lappuse - Each Inspector General shall report to and be under the general supervision of the head of the establishment involved...
68. lappuse - Whoever knowingly, with the intent to retaliate, takes any action harmful to any person, including interference with the lawful employment or livelihood of any person, for providing to a law enforcement officer any truthful information relating to the commission or possible commission of any Federal offense, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than 10 years, or both.
59. lappuse - General shall— (1) investigate all matters related to the receipt, disbursement, and use of public money; (2) estimate the cost to the United States Government of complying with each restriction on expenditures of a specific appropriation...
60. lappuse - anyone, including the agency head," can contact the Integrity Committee of the President's Council on Integrity and Efficiency ("PCIE") to "raise concerns and request a review.
21. lappuse - That is not what I am talking about. I am talking about, for example, the Mad River, or the Naugatuck River, which are not navigable.
59. lappuse - GAO supports congressional oversight by: — evaluating how well Government policies and programs are working; — auditing Agency operations to determine whether Federal funds are being spent efficiently, effectively, and appropriately; — investigating allegation of illegal and improper activities; and — issuing legal decisions and opinions.
59. lappuse - GAO continues to support Congressional oversight of executive branch agencies, such as by evaluating how well government policies and programs are working; auditing agency operations to determine whether federal funds are being spent efficiently and appropriately; investigating allegations of illegal and improper activities; and issuing legal decisions and opinions. It is true that GAO may respond to Congressional requests for information. However, this does not mean that GAO would be specifically...